T2 relaxation time and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human patellar cartilage at 1.5 T and 9.4 T: Relationships with tissue mechanical properties

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 366-374

  Lammentausta, Eveliina ^a   Kiviranta, P ^a   Nissi, M J ^b   Laasanen, M S ^b   Kiviranta, I ^c   Nieminen, M T ^d   Jurvelin, J S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b KUOPIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c JYVÄSKYLÄ CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^d OULU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Articular cartilage; Biomechanics; dGEMRIC; Human; T2

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE SCINTISCANNING; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATELLA; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; YOUNG MODULUS; KNEE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; WEIGHT BEARING;

CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATELLA; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 33645745614     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20041     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Mow VC, Fithian DC, Kelly MA. 1990. Fundamentals of articular cartilage and meniscus biomechanics. In: Ewing JW, editor. Articular cartilage and knee joint function: basic science and arthroscopy. New York: Raven Press Ltd.; p 1-18.
2. Mow VC, Ratcliffe A, Poole AR. 1992. Cartilage and diarthrodial joints as paradigms for hierarchical materials and structures. Biomaterials 13:67-97.
3. Benninghoff A. 1925. Form und Bau der Gelenkknorpel in ihren Beziehungen zur Function. Erste Mitteilung: die modellierenden und formerhaltenden Faktoren des Knorpelreliefs. Z Anat 76:43-63.
4. Bader DL, Kempson GE. 1994. The short-term compressive properties of adult human articular cartilage. Biomed Mater Eng 4:245-256.
5. Korhonen RK, Laasanen MS, Töyräs J, et al. 2003. Fibril reinforced poroelastic model predicts specifically mechanical behavior of normal, proteoglycan depleted and collagen degraded articular cartilage. J Biomech 36:1373-1379.
6. Froimson MI, Ratcliffe A, Gardner TR, et al. 1997. Differences in patellofemoral joint cartilage material properties and their significance to the etiology of cartilage surface fibrillation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 5:377-386.
7. Maroudas A, Evans H, Almeida L. 1973. Cartilage of the hip joint. Topographical variation of glycosaminoglycan content in normal and fibrillated tissue. Ann Rheum Dis 32:1-9.
8. Burstein D, Gray M. 2003. New MRI techniques for imaging cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A (Suppl 2):70-77.
9. Nieminen MT, Töyräs J, Rieppo J, et al. 2000. Quantitative MR microscopy of enzymatically degraded articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 43:676-681.
10. Xia Y, Moody JB, Burton-Wurster N, et al. 2001. Quantitative in situ correlation between microscopic MRI and polarized light microscopy studies of articular cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9: 393-406.
11. Nieminen MT, Rieppo J, Töyräs J, et al. 2001. T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: a comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study. Magn Reson Med 46:487-493.
12. Bashir A, Gray ML, Hartke J, et al. 1999. Nondestructive imaging of human cartilage glycosaminoglycan concentration by MRI. Magn Reson Med 41:857-865.
13. Nieminen MT, Rieppo J, Silvennoinen J, et al. 2002. Spatial assessment of articular cartilage proteoglycans with Gd-DTPA-enhanced T(1) imaging. Magn Reson Med 48:640-648.
14. Nieminen MT, Töyräs J, Laasanen MS, et al. 2004. Prediction of biomechanical properties of articular cartilage with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. J Biomech 37:321-328.
15. Nissi MJ, Töyräs J, Laasanen MS, et al. 2004. Proteoglyean and collagen sensitive MRI evaluation of normal and degenerated articular cartilage. J Orthop Res 22:557-564.
16. Wayne JS, Kraft KA, Shields KJ, et al. 2003. MR Imaging of normal and matrix-depleted cartilage: correlation with biomechanical function and biochemical composition. Radiology 228:493-499.
17. Samosky J, Burstein D, Grimson E, et al. 2005. Spatially-localized correlation of dGEMRIC-measured GAG distribution and mechanical stiffness in the human tibial plateau. J Orthop Res 23:93-101.
18. Kurkijärvi J, Nissi M, Kiviranta I, et al. 2004. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) and T2 characteristics of human knee articular cartilage: topographical variation and relationships to mechanical properties. Magn Reson Med 52:41-46.
19. Nieminen MT, Menezes N, Williams A, et al. 2004. T2 of articular cartilage in the presence of Gd-DTPA(2-). Magn Reson Med 51:1147-1152.
20. Abragam A. 1961. The principles of nuclear magnetism. London: Oxford University Press.
21. Töyräs J, Rieppo J, Nieminen MT, et al. 1999. Characterization of enzymatically induced degradation of articular cartilage using high frequency ultrasound. Phys Med Biol 44:2723-2733.
22. Jurvelin JS, Buschmann MD, Hunziker EB. 1997. Optical and mechanical determination of Poisson's ratio of adult bovine humeral articular cartilage. J Biomech 30:235-241.
23. Brown H, Prescott R. 2001. Applied mixed models in medicine. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
24. Buckwalter JA, Mankin HJ. 1997. Articular cartilage, part II: degeneration and osteoarthrosis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:612-632.
25. Xia Y. 1998. Relaxation anisotropy in cartilage by NMR microscopy (muMRI) at 14-microm resolution. Magn Reson Med 39:941-949.
26. Maier CF, Tan SG, Hariharan H, et al. 2003. T2 quantitation of articular cartilage at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:358-364.
27. Mendlik T, Faber SC, Weber J, et al. 2004. T2 quantitation of human articular cartilage in a clinical setting at 1.5 T: implementation and testing of four multiecho pulse sequence designs for validity. Invest Radiol 39:288-299.
28. Dunn TC, Lu Y, Jin H, et al. 2004. T2 relaxation time of cartilage at MR imaging: comparison with severity of knee osteoarthritis. Radiology 232: 592-598.
29. Keinan-Adamsky K, Shinar H, Navon G. 2005. The effect of detachment of the articular cartilage from its calcified zone on the cartilage microstructure, assessed by 2H-spectroscopic double quantum filtered MRI. J Orthop Res 23:109-117.
30. Setton LA, Tohyama H, Mow VC. 1998. Swelling and curling behaviors of articular cartilage. J Biomech Eng 120:355-361.