Quantification of T2 Relaxation Changes in Articular Cartilage with In Situ Mechanical Loading of the Knee

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 317-322

  Nag, David ^a   Liney, Gary P ^a   Gillespie, Paul ^a   Sherman, Kevin P ^a  

^a HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Knee; Loading; MRI; T2 measurement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BODY WEIGHT; COMPRESSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMUR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KNEE FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; TIBIA; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 1542319076     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20000     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bredella MA, Tirman PJF, Peterfy CG et al. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee. Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1073-1080.
2. Frank LR, Wong EC, Buxton RB, Resnick D. Mapping the physiological parameters of articular cartilage with magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:153-179.
3. 2-preliminary findings at 3T. Radiology 2000; 214:259-266.
4. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo MR imaging of hyaline articular cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:127-132.
5. Uhl M, Allmann KH, Tauer U, et al. Comparison of MR sequences in quantifying in vitro cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis of the knee. Br J Radiol 1998;71:291-296.
6. 2 mapping: application to the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6:603-607.
7. 2 of the knee joint. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Denver, 2000. p. 222.
8. Eckstein F, Tieschky M, Faber SC, et al. Effect of physical exercise on cartilage volume and thickness in-vivo. MR imaging study. Radiology 1998;207:243-248.
9. Herberhold C, Stammberger T, Faber S, et al. An MR-based technique for quantifying the deformation of articular cartilage during mechanical loading in an intact cadaver joint. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:843-850.
10. Regatte RR, Kaufman JH, Noyszewski EA, Reddy R. Sodium and proton MR properties of cartilage during compression. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:961-967.
11. Shinar H, Seo Y, Ikoma K, et al. Mapping the fiber orientation in articular cartilage at rest and under pressure studies by H-2 double quantum filtered MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:322-330.
12. Froimson MI, Ratcliffe A, Gardner TR, Mow VC. Differences in patellofemoral cartilage material properties and their significance to the etiology of cartilage surface fibrillation. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1997;5:377-386.
13. Heminen HJ, Kiviranta I, Saamanen AM, et al. Effect of motion and load on articular cartilage in animal models. In: Kuettner KE, Schleyerbach R, Peyron J, Hascall VC, editors. Articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. New York: Raven Press; 1992. p 501-510.
14. Liess C, Lusse S, Karger N, Heller M, Gluer CC. Detection of changes in cartilage water content using MRI T2 mapping in vivo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10:907-913.
15. Rubenstein JD, Kim JK, Henkelman RM. Effects of compression and recovery on bovine articular cartilage: Appearance on MR images. Radiology 1996;201:843-850.
16. Kimura S, Steinbach GC, Watenpaugh DE, Hargens AR. Lumbar spine disc height and curvature response to an axial load generated by a compression device compatible with magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 2001;26:2596-2600.
17. 2 quantitation of articular cartilage at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;17:358-364.
18. Reeder SB, Pelc NJ, Alley MT, Gold GE. Rapid imaging of articular cartilage with steady-state free precession and multipoint fat-water separation. Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:357-362.