Culturally compatible usability work: An interpretive case study on the relationship between usability work and its cultural context in software product development organizations

Journal of Organizational and End User Computing

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 40-65

  Iivari, Netta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Interpretive case study; Organizational culture; Software development organization; Usability; Usability work

Indexed keywords

INTERPRETIVE CASE STUDY; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURES; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS; USABILITY; USABILITY WORK;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 77956272805     PISSN: 15462234     EISSN: 15465012     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/joeuc.2010070103     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Ahadi, H. (2004). An Examination of the Role of Organizational Enablers in Business Process Reengineering and the Impact of Information Technology. Information Resources Management Journal, 17(4), 1-19.
2. Akrich, M. (1992). The De-Scription of Technical Objects . In Bijker, W., & Law, J. (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 205-224). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
3. Alvesson, M. (1990). On the Popularity of Organizational Culture. Acta Sociologica, 33(1), 31-49. doi:10.1177/000169939003300103
4. Artman, H. (2002). Procurer usability requirements: negotiations in contract development. In O. Bertelsen, S. Bødker, & K. Kuutti (Eds.), Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 61-70). New York: ACM Press.
5. Asaro, P. (2000). Transforming Society by Transforming Technology: the science and politics of participatory design. Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 10(4), 257-290. doi:10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00004-7
6. Aucella, A. (1997). Ensuring Success with Usability Engineering. Interaction, 4(3), 19-22. doi:10.1145/255392.255395
7. Avison, D., & Myers, M. (1995). Information systems and anthropology: an anthropological perspective on IT and organizational culture. Information Technology & People, 8(3), 43-56. doi:10.1108/09593849510098262
8. Bannon, L. (1991). From human factors to human actors: The role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. In J. Greenbaum & M. Kyng (Eds.), Design at Work. Cooperative Design of Computer Systems (pp. 25-44). Mahwah, NJ: New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D., & Mead, M. (1987, September). The Case Study Strategy in Studies of Information Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 368-386.
10. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
11. Bias, R., & Reitmeyer, P. (1995). Usability Support Inside and Out. Interaction, 2(2), 29-32. doi:10.1145/205350.205355
12. Billingsley, P. (1995). Starting from Scratch: Building a Usability Program at Union Pacific Railroad. Interaction, 2(4), 27-30. doi:10.1145/225362.225366
13. Bloomer, S., & Croft, R. (1997). Pitching Usability to Your Organization. Interaction, 4(6), 18-26. doi:10.1145/267505.267510
14. Bødker, S., & Buur, J. (2002). The Design Collaboratorium - a Place for Usability Design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9(2), 152-169. doi:10.1145/513665.513670
15. Boivie, I., Gulliksen, J., & Göransson, B. (2006). The lonesome cowboy: a study of the usability designer role in systems development. Interacting with Computers, 18(4), 601-634. doi:10.1016/j. intcom.2005.10.003
16. Borgholm, T., & Madsen, K. (1999). Cooperative Usability Practices. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 91-97. doi:10.1145/301353.301438
17. Borofsky, R. (Ed.). (1994). Assessing Cultural Anthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
18. Brown, A. (1995). Managing Understandings: Politics, Symbolism, Niche Marketing and the Quest for Legitimacy in IT Implementation. Organization Studies, 16(6), 951-969. doi:10.1177/017084069501600602
19. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. London: Heinemann Educational Books Ltd.
20. Cabrera, A., Cabrera, E., & Barajas, S. (2001). The key role of organizational culture in a multi-system view of technology-driven change. International Journal of Information Management, 21(3), 245-261. doi:10.1016/S0268-4012(01)00013-5
21. Carmel, E. (1997). American Hegemony in Packaged Software Trade and the "Culture of Software". The Information Society, 13(1), 125-142. doi:10.1080/019722497129322
22. Carmel, E., & Sawyer, S. (1998). Packaged software development teams: what makes them different? Information Technology & People, 11(1), 7-19. doi:10.1108/09593849810204503
23. Catarci, T., Matarazzo, G., & Raiss, G. (2002). Driving usability into the public administration: the Italian experience. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 57(2), 121-138. doi:10.1016/ S1071-5819(02)91014-1
24. Clement, A. (1994). Computing at Work: Empowering Action By 'Low-level Users'. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 52-63. doi:10.1145/175222.175226
25. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
26. Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum: Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity. Indianapolis, IN: Sams.
27. Cooper, C., & Bowers, J. (1995). Representing the users: Notes on the disciplinary rhetoric of humancomputer interaction . In Thomas, P. (Ed.), The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interfaces (pp. 48-66). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
28. Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1992). Exploring Complex Organizations. A Cultural Perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
29. Damodaran, L. (1996). User involvement in the systems designs process - a practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15(16), 363-377. doi:10.1080/014492996120049
30. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. doi:10.2307/249008
31. Davison, R., & Martinsons, M. (2002). Empowerment or enslavement? A case of processbased organizational change in Hong Kong. Information Technology & People, 15(1), 42-59. doi:10.1108/09593840210421516
32. Dent, J. (1991). Accounting and Organizational Cultures: A Field Study of the Emergence of a New Organizational Reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(8), 705-732. doi:10.1016/0361- 3682(91)90021-6
33. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (2000). Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research . In Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 1-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Dube, L., & Robey, D. (1999). Software Stories: Three Cultural Perspectives on the Organizational Practices of Software Development. Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 9(4), 223-259. doi:10.1016/S0959- 8022(99)00010-7
35. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. doi:10.2307/258557
36. Fellenz, C. (1997). Introducing Usability into Smaller Organizations. Interaction, 4(5), 29-33. doi:10.1145/264044.264047
37. Fok, L., Fok, W., & Hartman, S. (2001). Exploring the relationship between total quality management and information systems development. Information & Management, 38(6), 355-371. doi:10.1016/S0378- 7206(00)00075-6
38. Fox, R. (Ed.). (1991). Recapturing Anthropology. Working in the Present. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
39. Gallivan, M., & Srite, M. (2005). Information Technology and Culture: Merging Fragmented and Holistic Perpectives of Culture. Information and Organization, 15(2), 295-338. doi:10.1016/j. infoandorg.2005.02.005
40. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
41. Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.). (1991). Design at Work. Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42. Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1997). The Machine at Work. Technology, Work and Organization. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
43. Grudin, J. (1991a). Interactive Systems: Bridging the Gaps between Developers and Users. IEEE Computer, 24(4), 59-69.
44. Grudin, J. (1991b). Systematic Sources of Suboptimal Interface Design in Large Product Development Organizations. Human-Computer Interaction, 6(2), 147-196. doi:10.1207/s15327051hci0602-3
45. Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, Participatory Design and Product Development: An Infrastructure of Engagement. In T. Binder, J. Gregory, & I. Wagner (Eds.), Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference (pp. 144-161). Palo Alto, CA: CPSR.
46. Gulliksen, J., Boivie, I., & Göransson, B. (2006). Usability professionals - current practices and future development. Interacting with Computers, 18(4), 568-600. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.10.005
47. Harper, G., & Utley, D. (2001). Organizational Culture and Successful Information Technology Implementation. Engineering Management Journal, 13(2), 11-15.
48. Harrington, S., & Ruppel, C. (1999). Practical and value compatibility: their roles in the adoption, diffusion, and success of telecommuting. In P. De & J. DeGross (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of Information Systems (pp. 103-112). Atlanta, GA: AIS.
49. Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. (1989). Four Paradigms of Information Systems Development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1199-1216. doi:10.1145/67933.67937
50. Hutchings, A., & Knox, S. (1995). Creating Products - Customer Demand. Communications of the ACM, 38(5), 72-80. doi:10.1145/203356.203370
51. Iivari, J., & Hirschheim, R. (1996). Analyzing information systems development: a comparison and analysis of eight IS development approaches. Information Systems, 21(7), 551-575. doi:10.1016/ S0306-4379(96)00028-2
52. Iivari, N. (2006a). 'Representing the User' in Software Development - A Cultural Analysis of Usability Work in the Product Development Context. Interacting with Computers, 18(4), 635-664. doi:10.1016/j. intcom.2005.10.002
53. Iivari, N. (2006b). Understanding the Work of an HCI Practitioner. In A. Morch, K. Morgan, T. Bratteig, G. Ghosh, & D. Svanaes (Eds.), Proceedings of fourth Nordic Conference on Human Computer Interaction (pp. 185-194). New York: ACM.
54. International Standard ISO 13407. (1999). Humancentered design processes for interactive systems. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
55. International Standard ISO 9241-11. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT)s - Part 11 Guidance on usability. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
56. Kaarst-Brown, M., & Robey, D. (1999). More on Myth, Magic and Metaphor. Cultural Insights into the Management of Information Technology in Organizations. Information Technology & People, 12(2), 192-217. doi:10.1108/09593849910267251
57. Kanungo, S., Sadavarti, S., & Srinivas, Y. (2001). Relating IT strategy and organizational culture: An empirical study of public sector units in India. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(1), 29-57. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(01)00038-5
58. Karat, J. (1997). Evolving the Scope of User-Centered Design. Communications of the ACM, 40(7), 33-38. doi:10.1145/256175.256181
59. Keesing, R., & Strathern, A. (1998). Cultural Anthropology. A Contemporary Perspective (3rd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brave College Publishers.
60. Keil, M., & Carmel, E. (1995). Customer-Developer Links in Software Development. Communications of the ACM, 38(5), 33-44. doi:10.1145/203356.203363
61. Klein, H., & Myers, M. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 23(1), 67-94. doi:10.2307/249410
62. Kroeber, A., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: a critical review of the concepts and definitions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
63. Kujala, S. (2003). User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), 1-16. doi:10.1080/01449290301782
64. Kujala, S. (2007). Effective user involvement in product development by improving the analysis of user needs. Behaviour & Information Technology, 27(6), 457-473. doi:10.1080/01449290601111051
65. Kyng, M. (1994). Scandinavian Design: Users in Product Development. In B. Adelson, S. Dumais, & J. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3-9). New York: ACM.
66. Kyng, M. (1998). Users and computers: A contextual approach to design of computer artifacts. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 10(1-2), 7-44.
67. Lave, J., & Wenger, J. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
68. Leidner, D., & Kayworth, T. (2006). A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Towards a Theory of IT-Culture Conflict. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30(2), 357-399.
69. Lett, J. (1987). The Human Enterprise. A Critical Introduction to Anthropological Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press Inc.
70. Markus, M., & Mao, Y. (2004). Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating an Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5(11-12), 514-544.
71. Mayhew, D. (1999a). Strategic Development of Usability Engineering Function. Interaction, 6(5), 27-34. doi:10.1145/312683.312706
72. Mayhew, D. (1999b). The usability engineering lifecycle: a practitioner's handbook for user interface design. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.
73. Muller, M., & Carey, K. (2002). Design as a Minority Discipline in a Software Company: Toward Requirements for a Community of Practice. In [CHI Letters]. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4(1), 383-390.
74. Mumford, E. (1983). Designing Human Systems for New Technology. The ETHICS Method. Manchester, UK: Manchester Business School.
75. Nandhakumar, J., & Jones, M. (1997). Designing in the Dark: the Changing User-Developer Relationship in Information Systems Development. In J. DeGross & K. Kumar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th International Conference of Information Systems (pp. 75-86). Atlanta, GA: AIS.
76. Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. Boston, MA: Academic Press.
77. Nielsen, J., & Mack, R. (Eds.). (1994). Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
78. Ortner, S. (Ed.). (1999). The Fate of Culture. Geertz and Beyond. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
79. Ouchi, W., & Wilkins, A. (1985). Organizational Culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 457-483. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.11.080185.002325
80. Pliskin, N., Romm, T., Lee, A., & Weber, Y. (1993). Presumed Versus Actual Organizational Culture: Managerial Implications for Implementation of Information Systems. The Computer Journal, 36(2), 1-10. doi:10.1093/comjnl/36.2. 143
81. Poltrock, S., & Grudin, J. (1994). Organizational Obstacles to Interface Design and Development: Two Participant - Observer Studies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 1(1), 52-80. doi:10.1145/174630. 174633
82. Robey, D., & Azevedo, A. (1994). Cultural Analysis of the Organizational Consequences of Information Technology. Accounting . Management & Information Technology, 4(1), 23-37. doi:10.1016/0959- 8022(94)90011-6
83. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
84. Rosenbaum, S., Rohn, J., & Humburg, J. (2000). A Toolkit for Strategic Usability: Results from Workshops, Panels, and Surveys. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI Letters) (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 337-344). New York: ACM.
85. Rosson, M., & Carroll, J. (2002). Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human- Computer Interaction. San Francisco, CA: Morgan- Kaufman.
86. Ruppel, C., & Harrington, S. (2001). Sharing Knowledge through Intranets: A Study of Organizational Culture and Intranet Implementation. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 44(1), 37-52. doi:10.1109/47.911131
87. Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
88. Schwandt, T. (2000). Three Epistemological Stances for Qualitative Inquiry: Interpretivism, Hermeneutics, and Social Constructionism . In Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 189-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
89. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358. doi:10.2307/2392246
90. Spinuzzi, C. (2002). A Scandinavian Challenge, a US Response: Methodological Assumptions in Scandinavian and US Prototyping Approaches. In Proceedings of the 20th annual international conference on Computer documentation (pp. 208-215). New York: ACM.
91. Suchman, L. (1995). Making Work Visible. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 56-64. doi:10.1145/223248.223263
92. Suchman, L. (2002). Located accountabilities in technology production . Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 91-105.
93. Tudor, L. (1998). Human Factors: Does Your Management Hear You? Interaction, 5(1), 16-24. doi:10.1145/268986.268989
94. van Maanen, J., & Barley, S. (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in Organizations . In Staw, B., & Cummings, L. (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior 6 (pp. 287-365). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
95. Vredenburg, K., Mao, J., Smith, P., & Casey, T. (2002). A survey of user-centered design practice. In CHI Letters. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2(1), 471-478.
96. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74-81. doi:10.1057/ ejis.1995.9
97. Weedon, C. (2004). Identity and Culture: Narratives of Difference and Belonging. New York: Open University Press.
98. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.