Validation of coevolving residue algorithms via pipeline sensitivity analysis: ELSC and OMES and ZNMI, oh my!

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Brown, Christopher A ^a   Brown, Kevin S ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHORISMIC ACID; CHORISMIC SYNTHASE; G PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROTEIN;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPLICIT LIKELIHOOD OF SUBSET CO VARIATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; OBSERVED MINUS EXPECTED SQUARED; PREDICTION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN FAMILY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; VALIDITY; Z SCORED PRODUCT NORMALIZED MUTUAL INFORMATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; MOLECULAR GENETICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEINS;

EID: 77956219920     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010779     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Perez-Iratxeta C, Palidwor G, Andrade-Navarro M (2007) Towards completion of the earth's proteome. EMBO Reports 8: 1135-1141.
2. Martin L, Gloor G, Dunn S, Wahl L (2005) Using information theory to search for co-evolving residues in proteins. Bioinformatics 21: 4116-4124.
3. Atchley WR, Wollenberg KR, Fitch WM, Terhalle W, Dress AW (2000) Correlations among amino acid sites in bhlh protein domains: an information theoretic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 164-178.
4. Horner D, Pirovano W, Pesole G (2007) Correlated substitution analysis and the prediction of amino acid structural contacts. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9: 46-56.
5. Ashkenazy H, Unger R, Kliger Y (2009) Optimal data collection for correlated mutation analysis. Proteins 74: 545-555.
6. Little DY, Chen L, Shiu SH (2009) Identification of coevolving residues and coevolution potentials emphasizing structure, bond formation and catalytic coordination in protein evolution. PLoS ONE 4: e4762.
7. Caporaso JG, Smit S, Easton BC, Hunter L, Huttley GA, et al. (2008) Detecting coevolution without phylogenetic trees? tree-ignorant metrics of coevolution perform as well as tree-aware metrics. BMC Evol Biol 8.
8. Dunn S, Wahl L, Gloor G (2008) Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction. Bioinformatics 24: 333-340.
9. Halabi N, Rivoire O, Leibler S, Ranganathan R (2009) Protein sectors: evolutionary units of three-dimensional structure. Cell 138: 774-786.
10. Kass I, Horovitz A (2002) Mapping pathways of allosteric communication in groel by analysis of correlated mutations. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 48: 611-617.
11. Lockless S, Ranganathan R (1999) Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 286: 295-299.
12. Dekker J, Fodor A, Aldrich R, Yellen G (2004) A perturbation-based method for calculating explicit likelihood of evolutionary co-variance in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 20: 1565-1572.
13. Lena PD, Fariselli P, Margara L, Vassura M, Casadio R (2009) Algorithms in Bioinformatics, Springer-Verlag, chapter On the upper bound of the prediction accuracy of residue contacts in proteins with correlated mutations: the case study of the similarity matrices. pp 62-72.
14. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A (1994) Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics 18: 309-317.
15. Fodor A, Aldrich R (2004) Influence of conservation on calculations of amino acid covariance in multiple sequence alignments. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 56: 211-221.
16. Finn R, Tate J, Mistry J, Coggill P, Sammut S, et al. (2007) The pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Research. pp 1-8.
17. Fatakia SN, Costanzi S, Chow CC, Louis M (2009) Computing highly correlated positions using mutual information and graph theory for g protein-coupled receptors. PLoS ONE 4: e4681.
18. Skerker JM, Perchuk BS, Siryaporn A, Lubin EA, Ashenberg O, et al. (2008) Rewiring the specificity of two-component signal transduction systems. Cell 133: 1043-1054.
19. Huettel S, Song A, McCarthy G (2004) Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer. 510 p.
20. Friston K, Frith C, Liddle P, Frackowiak R (1991) Comparing functional (PET) images: The assessment of significant change. Journal of Cerbral Blood Flow and Metabolism 11: 690-699.
21. Worsley K, Evans A, Strother S, Tyler J (1992) A three-dimensional statistical analysis for rCBF activation studies in human brain. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 12: 900-918.
22. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1998) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. CRC Press LLC. 456 p.
23. Strother S, Lange N, Anderson J, Schaper K, Rehm K, et al. (1997) Activation pattern reproducibility: measuring the effects of group size and data analysis models. Human Brain Mapping 5: 312-316.
24. Strother S, Anderson J, Hansen L, Kjems U, Kustra R, et al. (2002) The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the NPAIRS data analysis framework. Neuroimage 15: 747-771.
25. Strother S, LaConte S, Hansen L, Anderson J, Zhang J, et al. (2004) Optimizing the fMRI data-processing pipeline using prediction and reproducibility performance metrics: I. A preliminary group analysis. Neuroimage 23: S196-S207.
26. MacKay DJC (2003) Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press. 550 p.
27. Cover TM, Thomas JA (2006) Elements of Information Theory. John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition. 776 p.
28. Quevillon-Cheruel S, Leulliot N, Meyer P, Graille M, Bremang M, et al. (2004) Crystal structure of the bifunctional chorismate synthase from saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279: 619-625.
29. Warne T, Serrano-Vega M, Baker J, Moukhametzianov R, Edwards P, et al. (2008) Structure of a beta1-adrenergic g-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 454: 486-492.
30. Long J, Tochio H, Wang P, Fan J, Sala C, et al. (2003) Supramodular structure and synergistic target binding of the n-terminal tandem pdz domains of psd-95. Journal of Molecular Biology 327: 203-214.
31. Chi CN, Elfström L, Shi Y, Snäll T, Engström Å, et al. (2008) Reassessing a sparse energetic network within a single protein domain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 4679-4684.
32. Süel GM, Lockless SW, Wall MA, Ranganathan R (2003) Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 10: 59-69.
33. Fodor A, Aldrich R (2004) On evolutionary conservation of thermodynamic coupling in proteins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279: 19046-19050.
34. Messac A, Mullur AA (2007) Optimization of Structural and Mechanical Systems, World Scientific Publishing Co., chapter Multiobjective optimization: concepts and methods. pp 121-148.
35. Edgar R (2004) Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792-1797.
36. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T (2002) Mafft: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 3059-3066.
37. White P, Millar G, Coggins J (1988) The overexpression, purification and complete amino acid sequence of chorismate synthase from escherichia coli k12 and its comparison with the enzyme from neurospora crassa. Biochemical Journal 251: 313-322.
38. Dias MVB, Borges JC, Ely F, Pereira JH, Canduri F, et al. (2006) Structure of chorismate synthase from mycobacterium tuberculosis. Journal of Structural Biology 154: 130-143.
39. Henstrand J, Schmid N, Amrhein N (1995) Only the mature form of the plastidic chorismate synthase is enzymatically active. Plant Physiology. pp 1127-1132.
40. Pan H, Lee J, Hilser V (2000) Binding sites in escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase communicate by modulating the conformational ensemble. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97: 12020-12025.
41. Baker D (2000) A surprising simplicity to protein folding. Nature 405: 39-42.
42. Eddy S (1998) Profile hidden markov models. Bioinformatics 14: 755-763.
43. Notredame C, Higgins D, Heringa J (2000) T-coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. Journal of Molecular Biology 302: 205-217.
44. Newman M (2004) Detecting community structure in networks. The European Physical Journal B 38: 321-330.
45. Danon L, Díaz-Guilera A, Duch J, Arenas A (2005) Comparing community structure identification. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment: P09008.
46. Newman M (2006) Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Physical Review E 74: 036104.
47. Jaccard P (1901) Étude comparative de la distribution florale dans une portion des alpes et des jura. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles 37: 547-579.