Learning from international business affiliates: Developing resource-based learning capacity through networks and knowledge acquisition

Journal of International Management

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 262-274

  Pérez Nordtvedt, Liliana ^a   Babakus, Emin ^b   Kedia, Ben L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Absorptive capacity; Effective learning; Efficient learning; Network centrality; Resource based learning capacity; Tie strength

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956200596     PISSN: 10754253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intman.2010.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Almeida P., Kogut B. Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manage. Sci. 1999, 45(7):905-917.
2. Alvarez S., Barney J. How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners. Acad. Manage. Exec. 2001, 15(1):139-148.
3. Armstrong J.S., Overton T. Estimating non-response bias in mail surveys. J. Mark. Res. 1977, 51(7):71-86.
4. Barkema H.G., Nadolska A. How internationalizing firms develop their absorptive capacity over time: the case of acquisitions. Acad. Manage. Proc. 2003, 1-16.
5. Barnett M.L. An attention-based view of real options reasoning. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2008, 33(3):606-628.
6. Berk R.A. An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1983, 48:386-398.
7. Bierly P., Chakrabarti A. Generic knowledge strategies in the US pharmaceutical industry. Strateg. Manage. J. 1996, 17:123-135.
8. Bresman H., Birkinshaw J., Nobel R. Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 1999, 30(3):439-462.
9. Burt R.S. Social contagion and innovation: cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am. J. Sociol. 1987, 92(6):1287-1335.
10. Cohen W.N., Levinthal D.A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q. 1990, 35:128-152.
11. Cycyota C., Harrison D.A. What (not) to expect when surveying executives: A meta-analysis of top manager response rates and techniques over time. Orgl. Res. Meth. 2006, 9(2):133-160.
12. Datta D.K., Rajagopalan N. Industry structure and CEO characteristics: An empirical study of succession events. Strateg. Manage. J. 1998, 19:833-852.
13. Dhanaraj C., Lyles M., Steensma H.K., Tihanyi L. Managing tacit and implicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: The role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2004, 35(5):456-458.
14. Dillman D. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method 1978, Wiley, New York, NY.
15. Dyer J.H., Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strateg. Manage. J. 2000, 21:345-367.
16. Dyer J.H., Singh H. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1998, 23(4):660-679.
17. Fornell C., Larcker D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18:39-50. February.
18. Friedkin N.E., Slater M.R. School leadership and performance: a social network approach. Sociol. Educ. 1994, 67(2):139-157.
19. George G., Zahra S.A., Wheatley K.K., Khan R. The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: a study of biotechnology firms. J. High Technol. Manage. Res. 2001, 12(2):205-226.
20. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 1973, 78:1360-1380.
21. Grant R.M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strateg. Manage. J. 1996, 17:109-122.
22. Guthrie J.P., Datta D.K. Dumb and dumber: the impact of downsizing on firm performance as moderated by industry conditions. Org. Sci. 2008, 18(1):108-123.
23. Håkanson L., Nobel R. Organizational characteristics and reverse technology transfer. Manage. Int. Rev. 2001, 41:395-420.
24. Hamel, G. 1990. Competitive collaboration: learning, power and dependence in international strategic alliances. Unpublished dissertation, The University of Michigan.
25. Hamel G., Prahalad C.K. Competing for the Future 1994, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
26. Hansen M.T., Mors M.L., Løvås B. Knowledge sharing in organizations: multiple networks, multiple phases. Acad. Manage. J. 2005, 48(5):776-793.
27. Heckman J.J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 1979, 47:153-161.
28. Helfat C.E., Peteraf M.A. The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strateg. Manage. J. 2003, 24:997-1010.
29. Hitt M.A., Bierman L., Shimizu K., Kochhar R. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional firms: a resource-based perspective. Acad. Manage. J. 2001, 44(1):13-28.
30. Hitt M.A., Dacin T., Levitas E., Arregle J.-L., Borza A. Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Acad. Manage. J. 2000, 43(3):449-467.
31. Hommans G.C. Fifty years of sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 1986, 12. xiii-xxx.
32. Huber G.P. Organizational learning: the contributing process and the literatures. Org. Sci. 1991, 2(1):88-115.
33. Hughes M.A., Price R.L., Marrs D.W. Linking theory construction and theory testing: models with multiple indicators and latent variables. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1986, 11(1):128-144.
34. Inkpen A.C., Tsang E.W.K. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2005, 30(1):146-165.
35. Jansen J., Van Den Bosch F., Volberda H. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter?. Acad. Manage. J. 2005, 48:999-1015.
36. Joreskog K.G., Sorbom D. LISREL8: Structural Equation Modeling With the SIMPLIS Command Language 1993, SSI, Chicago, IL.
37. Kaplan D.W. Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions 2000, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
38. Kim C.-S., Inkpen A.C. Cross-border R&D alliances, absorptive capacity and technology learning. J. Int. Manage. 2005, 11(3):313-329.
39. Koch M.J., McGrath R.G. Improving labor productivity: human resource management policies do matter. Strateg. Manage. J. 1996, 17:335-354.
40. Kyriakopoulos K., de Ruyter K. Knowledge stocks and information flows in new product development. J. Manage. Stud. 2004, 41(8):1469-1498.
41. Lane P.J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strateg. Manage. J. 1998, 19(5):461-477.
42. Lane P.J., Salk J.E., Lyles M.A. Absorptive capacity, learning and performance in international joint ventures. Strateg. Manage. J. 2001, 22:1139-1161.
43. Lane P., Koka B., Pathak S. The reification of absorptive capacity: a critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2006, 31(4):833-836.
44. Lenox M., King A. Prospects for developing absorptive capacity through internal information provision. Strateg. Manage. J. 2004, 25:331-345.
45. Lepak D.P., Takeuchi R., Snell S.A. Employment flexibility and firm performance: examining the interaction effects of employment mode, environmental dynamism, and technological intensity. J. Manage. 2003, 29:681-703.
46. Levin D.Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: the mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Manage. Sci. 2004, 50(11):1477-1490.
47. Lyles M.A., Salk J.E. Knowledge acquisition from foreign parents in international joint ventures: an empirical examination in the Hungarian context. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 1996, 27(5):877-903.
48. Marquardt M., Reynolds A. The Global Learning Organization: Gaining Competitive Advantage Through Continuous Learning 1994, Irwin Professional Publications, Burr Ridge, IL.
49. McEvily S., Chakravarthy B. The persistence of knowledge-based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge. Strateg. Manage. J. 2002, 23(4):285-305.
50. Miner A.S., Bassoff P., Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and learning: a field study. Adm. Sci. Q. 2001, 46:304-337.
51. Moreno J.L. Foundations of sociometry: an introduction. Sociometry 1941, 4(1):15-35.
52. Nunnally J.C. Psychometric Theory 1978, McGraw-Hill, New York. second ed.
53. Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manage. J. 1997, 18:187-206.
54. Pérez-Nordtvedt L., Kedia B.L., Datta D., Rasheed A. Effectiveness and efficiency of cross-border knowledge transfer: an empirical examination. J. Manage. Stud. 2008, 45(4):714-744.
55. Podsakoff P., MacKenzie S., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88(5):879-903.
56. Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range. Adm. Sci. Q. 2003, 48:240-267.
57. Rhee J.H. The Internet era and the international expansion process: the moderating role of absorptive capacity. Manage. Int. Rev. 2005, 45(3):277-306.
58. Simon H.A. Administrative Behavior 1947, MacMillan, Chicago, IL.
59. Simonin B.L. The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization. Acad. Manage. J. 1997, 40(5):1150-1174.
60. Simonin B.L. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strateg. Manage. J. 1999, 20(7):595-623.
61. Simonin B.L. An empirical investigation of the process of knowledge transfer in international strategic alliances. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2004, 35(5):407-427.
62. Sorenson O., Sorensen J.B. Finding the right mix: franchising, organizational learning, and chain performance. Strateg. Manage. J. 2001, 22:713-724.
63. Stock G.N., Greis N.P., Fischer W.A. Absorptive capacity and new product development. J. High Tech. Manage. Res. 2001, 12(1):77-91.
64. Szulanski G. Unpacking stickiness: an empirical investigation of the barriers to transfer best practice inside the firm. Acad. Management Best paper proceedings 1995, 437-441.
65. Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strateg. Manage. J. 1996, 17:27-43.
66. Szulanski G., Cappetta R., Jensen R.J. When and how trustworthiness matters: knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Org. Sci. 2004, 15(5):600-613.
67. Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manage. J. 1997, 18(7):509-533.
68. Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Acad. Manage. J. 2001, 44(5):996-1004.
69. Tsang E.W.K. Acquiring knowledge by foreign partners for international joint ventures in a transition economy: learning-by-doing and learning myopia. Strateg. Manage. J. 2002, 23(9):835-854.
70. Valente T.W. Network Models of the Diffusion of Innovations 1995, Hampton Press, Inc., Cresskill, NJ.
71. Van Den Bosch F., Volberda H., De Boer M. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Org. Sci. 1999, 10(5):551-568.
72. Yli-Renko H., Autio E., Sapienza H. Social capital, knowledge acquisitions, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strateg. Manage. J. 2001, 22(6/7):587-613.
73. Zahra S.A., George G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2002, 27(2):185-203.
74. Zahra S.A., Ireland R.D., Hitt M.A. International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance. Acad. Manage. J. 2000, 43(5):925-950.
75. Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Org. Sci. 1995, 6(1):76-92.