Another reply to Truscott on error correction: Improved situated designs over statistics

System

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 491-498

  Bruton, Anthony ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956179857     PISSN: 0346251X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2010.07.001     Document Type: Letter

References (40)

1. Brown R., Waring R., Donkaewbua S. Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, reading-while-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language 2008, 20:136-163.
2. Bruton A. Process writing and communicative-task-based instruction: many common features, but more common limitations?. TESL-EJ 2005, 9(3).
3. Bruton A. Partial lexical knowledge in tests of incidental vocabulary learning from L2 reading. Canadian Modern Language Review 2007, 64(1):161-178.
4. Bruton A. Vocabulary learning from dictionary referencing and language feedback in EFL translational writing. Language Teaching Research 2007, 11:413-431.
5. Bruton A. Improving accuracy is not the only reason for writing, and even if it were .... System 2009, 37:600-613.
6. Bruton A. Designing research into the effect of error correction in L2 writing: not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing 2009, 18:136-140.
7. Chandler J. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2003, 12:267-296.
8. Chastain K. Characteristics of graded and ungraded compositions. The Modern Language Journal 1990, 74:10-14.
9. Cowan R., Choi H.E., Kim D.H. Four questions for error diagnosis and correction in CALL. CALICO 2002, 20:451-463.
10. Ellis R. Interpretation-based grammar teaching. System 1993, 21:69-78.
11. Ellis R. Interpretation tasks for grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly 1995, 29:87-105.
12. Ellis R. Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 2009, 19:221-246.
13. Ellis R., Sheen Y., Murakam M., Takashima H. The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System 2008, 36:353-371.
14. Enginarlar H. Student response to teacher feedback in EFL writing. System 1993, 21:193-204.
15. Fazio L. The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing 2001, 10:235-249.
16. Ferris D., Roberts B. Error feedback in L2 writing classes. How explicit does it need to be?. Journal of Second Language Writing 2001, 10:161-184.
17. Greenia G. Computers and teaching composition in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals 1992, 25:33-46.
18. Higgs T.V., Clifford R. The push toward communication. Curriculum, Competence and the Foreign Language Teacher 1982, 57-79. National Textbook Company, Skokie, IL. T.V. Higgs (Ed.).
19. Hulstijn J.H. Intentional and incidental second language vocabulary learning: a reappraisal of elaboration, rehearsal and automaticity. Cognition and Second Language Instruction 2001, 258-286. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. Robinson (Ed.).
20. Kenworthy R. Times versus at-home assessment tests: does time affect the quality of second language learners' written compositions?. TESL-EJ 2006, 10(1). Retrieved from. http://tesl-ej.org.
21. Kepner C.G. An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal 1991, 75:305-313.
22. Lalande J. Reducing composition errors: an experiment. The Modern Language Journal 1982, 66:140-149.
23. Laufer B. Vocabulary acquisition in a second language: do learners really acquire most vocabulary by reading? Some empirical evidence. The Canadian Modern Language Review 2003, 59:567-587.
24. Long M.H. A role for instruction in second language acquisition: task-based language training. Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition 1985, 77-99. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon. K. Hyltenstam, M. Pienemann (Eds.).
25. Long M.H. Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective 1991, 39-52. John Benjamins, Amsterdam. K. de Bot, R.B. Ginsberg, C. Kramsch (Eds.).
26. Long M.H., Robinson P. Focus on form: theory, research, and practice. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition 1998, 15-41. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Doughty, J. Williams (Eds.).
27. Makino T.-Y. Learner self-correction in EFL written compositions. ELT Journal 1993, 47:337-341.
28. McLaughlin B. Restructuring. Applied Linguistics 1990, 11:113-128.
29. Pienemann M. Learnability and syllabus construction. Modelling and Assessing Second Language Acquisition 1985, 23-75. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, UK. K. Hyltenstam, M. Pienemann (Eds.).
30. Robb T., Ross S., Shortreed I. Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality. TESOL Quarterly 1986, 20:83-93.
31. Semke H.D. Effects of the red pen. Foreign Language Annals 1984, 17:195-202.
32. Sheppard K. Two feedback types: do they make a difference?. RELC Journal 1992, 23:103-110.
33. Skehan P. Modelling second language performance: integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics 2009, 30:510-532.
34. Swain M. Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. Input in Second Language Acquisition 1985, 235-253. Newbury House, Rowley, MA. S. Gass, C. Madden (Eds.).
35. Truscott J. The case against grammar correction in L2 writing. Language Learning 1996, 46:327-369.
36. Truscott J. What's wrong with oral grammar correction?. The Canadian Modern Language Review 1999, 55:437-467.
37. Truscott J. The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16:255-272.
38. Truscott J. Some thoughts on Anthony Bruton's critique of the correction debate. System 2010, 38:329-335.
39. Truscott J., Hsu A.Y. Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008, 17:292-305.
40. Westney P. Rules and pedagogical grammar. Perspectives on Pedagogical Grammar 1994, 72-96. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. T. Odlin (Ed.).