Demand for sucrose in the genetically obese Zucker (fa/fa) rat

Behavioural Processes

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 191-197

  Rasmussen, Erin B ^a   Reilly, William ^a   Hillman, Conrad ^a  

^a IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavioral economics; Essential value; Fixed ratio schedule; Food reinforcer efficacy; Free food intake; Obesity; Zucker rat

Indexed keywords

SUCROSE;

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD CONSUMPTION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC VARIATION; OBESITY; PHENOTYPE; RODENT; SUCROSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOOD INTAKE; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; OBESITY; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; ZUCKER RAT;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; EATING; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; GENOTYPE; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; OBESITY; PHENOTYPE; RATS; RATS, ZUCKER; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; SUCROSE;

RATTUS;

EID: 77956170674     PISSN: 03766357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Azain M.J., Broderson J.R., Martin R.J. Effects of long-term somatotropin treatment on body composition and life span in aging Zucker rats. Experimental Biology and Medicine 2006, 231:76-83.
2. Barbano M.F., Cador M. Various aspects of feeding behavior can be partially dissociated in the rat by the incentive properties of food and the physiological state. Behavioral Neuroscience 2005, 119:1244-1253.
3. Barbano M.F., Le Saux M., Cador M. Involvement of dopamine and opioids in the motivation to eat: influence of palatability, homeostatic state, and behavioral paradigms. Psychopharmacology 2009, 203:475-487.
4. Beck B. Neuropeptides and obesity. Nutrition 2000, 16:916-923.
5. Bickel W.K., Marsch L.A., Carroll M.E. Deconstructing relative reinforcing efficacy and situating the measures of pharmacological reinforcement with behavioral economics: a theoretical proposal. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2000, 153:44-56.
6. Bickel W.K., Vuchinich R.E. Reframing Health: Behavioral Change with Behavioral Economics 2000, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ.
7. Bjenning C.A., Rimvall K. oCRF and CRF (6-33) depress food but not water intake in the obese Zucker rat. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 2000, 24(Suppl. 2):S140-141.
8. Carroll M.E., Carmona G.G., May S.A. Modifying drug-reinforced behavior by altering the economic conditions of the drug and non-drug reinforcer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1991, 56:361-376.
9. Chaney M., Rowland N.E. Food demand functions in mice. Appetite 2008, 51:669-675.
10. Collier G., Johnson D.F., Morgan C. The magnitude-of-reinforcement function in closed and open economies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1992, 57:81-89.
11. DiMarzo V., Gopaaraju S., Wang L., Liu J. Leptin regulated endocannabinoids are involved in maintaining food intake. Nature 2001, 410:822-825.
12. Drewnowski A., Grinker J.A. Food and water intake, meal patterns and activity of obese and lean Zucker rats following chronic and acute treatment with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior 1978, 9:619-630.
13. Duran C., McSweeney F.K. Rate of responding as a function of ratio requirement when no supplemental feedings are given. Behavioural Processes 1987, 15:293-303.
14. Epstein L.H., Leddy J.J., Temple J.L., Faith M.S. Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis. Psychological Bulletin 2007, 133:884-906.
15. Epstein L.H., Saelens B.E. Behavioral economics of obesity: food intake and energy expenditure. Reframing Health: Behavioral Change with Behavioral Economics 2000, 293-311. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. W.K. Bickel, R.E. Vuchinich (Eds.).
16. Epstein L.H., Temple J.L., Neaderhiser B.J., Salis R.J., Erbe R.W., Leddy J.J. Food reinforcement, the dopamine D2 receptor genotype, and energy intake in obese and nonobese humans. Behavioral Neuroscience 2007, 121:877-886.
17. Foltin R., Fischman M. The effects of varying procurement costs on food intake in baboons. Physiology & Behavior 1988, 43:493-499.
18. Freed D.E., Green L. A behavioral economic analysis of fat appetite in rats. Appetite 1998, 31:333-349.
19. Hodos W. Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strengh. Science 1961, 269:943-944.
20. Houston A., McNamara J. The value of food: effects of open and closed economies. Animal Behaviour 1989, 37:546-562.
21. Hursh S.R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1980, 34:219-238.
22. Hursh S.R. Behavioral economics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1984, 42:435-452.
23. Hursh S. Behavioral economic concepts and methods for studying health behavior. Reframing Health Behavior Change with Behavioral Economics 2000, 27-60. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. W.K. Bickel, R.E. Vuchinich (Eds.).
24. Hursh S.R., Raslear T.G., Shurtleff D., Bauman R., Simmons L. A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1988, 50:419-440.
25. Hursh S.R., Silberberg A. Economic demand and essential value. Psychological Review 2008, 115:186-198.
26. Hursh S.R., Winger G. Normalized demand for other drugs and reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1995, 64:373-384.
27. Inokuchi J. Insulin resistance as a membrane microdomain disorder. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin 2006, 29:1532-1537.
28. Kurtz T.W., Morris R.C., Pershadsingh H.A. The Zucker fatty rat as a genetic model of obesity and hypertension. Hypertension 1989, 13:896-901.
29. Lutz T.A. Amylinergic control of food intake. Physiology & Behavior 2006, 89:465-471.
30. Madden G.J., Hartman E.C. A steady-state test of the demand curve analysis of relative reinforcer efficacy. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2006, 14:79-86.
31. Madden G.J., Smethells J.R., Ewan E.E., Hursh S.R. Tests of behavioral economic assessments of relative reinforcer efficacy: economic substitutes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2007, 87:219-240.
32. Morato S., Johnson D.F., Collier G. Feeding patterns of rats when food access cost is alternately low and high. Physiology & Behavior 1994, 57:21-26.
33. Odum A.L., Baumann A.A.L., Rimington D.D. Discounting of delayed hypothetical money and food: effects of amount. Behavioural Processes 2006, 73:278-284.
34. Raslear T.G., Bauman R.A., Hursh S.R., Shurtleff D. Rapid demand curves for behavioral economics. Animal Learning & Behavior 1988, 16:330-339.
35. Rasmussen E.B., Huskinson S.L. Effects of rimonabant on behavior maintained by progressive ratio schedules of sucrose reinforcement in obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats. Behavioural Pharmacology 2008, 19:735-742.
36. Rasmussen E.B., Lawyer S.R., Reilly W. Percent body fat is related to delay and probability discounting for food in humans. Behavioural Processes 2010, 83:23-30.
37. Rodefer J.S., Carroll M.E. A comparison of progressive ratio schedules versus behavioral economic measures: effect of an alternative reinforcer on the reinforcing efficacy of phencyclidine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1997, 132:95-103.
38. Saelens B.E., Epstein L.H. The reinforcing value of food in obese and non-obese women. Appetite 1996, 27:41-50.
39. Sahu A. Minireview: a hypothalamic role in energy balance with special emphasis on leptin. Endocrinology 2004, 145:2613-2620.
40. Siddiqui A.H., Ali Q., Hussain T. Protective role of angiotensin II subtype 2 receptor in blood pressure increase in obese Zucker rats. Hypertension 2009, 53:256-261.
41. Stafford D., LeSage M.G., Glowa J.R. Progressive-ratio schedules of drug delivery in the analysis of drug self-administration: a review. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998, 139:169-184.
42. Strang J., McWhirter J.J. Advances in Behavioral Economics, Vol. 3: Substance Use and Abuse 2004, American Psychological Association, USA.
43. Thanos P.K., Ramalhete R.C., Michaelides M., Piyis Y.K., Wang G.J., Volkow N.D. Leptin receptor deficiency is associated with upregulation of cannabinoid 1 receptors in limbic brain regions. Synapse 2008, 62:637-642.
44. Vickers S.P., Webster L.J., Wyatt A., Dourish C.T., Kennett G.A. Preferential effects of the cannabinoid CB2081; receptor antagonist, SR 141716, on food intake and body weight gain of obese (fa/fa) compared to lean Zucker rats. Psychopharmacology 2003, 167:103-111.
45. Yoshimatsu H., Machidori H., Doi T., Kurokawa M. Abnormalities in obese Zuckers: defective control of histaminergic functions. Physiology & Behavior 1993, 54:487-491.
46. Zucker L.M., Zucker T.F. Fatty, a new mutation in the rat. The Journal of Heredity 1962, 52:275-278.