Quantitative optimal experimental design using global sensitivity analysis via quasi-linearization

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 49, Issue 17, 2010, Pages 7782-7794

  Chu, Yunfei ^a   Hahn, Juergen ^a  

^a Texas AandM University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN MATRIX; ESTIMATED PARAMETER; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; LINEAR MODEL; LINEARIZED MODELS; LOCAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; NON-LINEAR MODEL; OPTIMAL DESIGN; OPTIMAL EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; PARAMETER ESTIMATE; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; PARAMETER VALUES; QUASI-LINEARIZATION; SENSITIVITY VALUES;

DESIGN; LINEARIZATION; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; STATISTICS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 77956083795     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: 15205045     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie9009827     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Steinberg, D. M.; Hunter, W. G. Experimental-design-Review and comment Technometrics 1984, 26, 71-97
2. Walter, E.; Pronzato, L. Qualitative and quantitative experiment design for phenomenological models-A survey Automatica 1990, 26, 195-213
3. Ljung, L. System identification: Theory for the user, 2nd ed.; Prentice Hall PTR: Upper Saddle River, 1999.
4. Atkinson, A. C.; Donev, A. N.; Tobias, R. D. Optimum experimental designs, with SAS; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2007.
5. Franceschini, G.; Macchietto, S. Model-based design of experiments for parameter precision: State of the art Chem. Eng. Sci. 2008, 63, 4846-4872
6. Balsa-Canto, E.; Alonso, A. A.; Banga, J. R. Computational procedures for optimal experimental design in biological systems IET Syst. Biol. 2008, 2, 163-172
7. Kreutz, C.; Timmer, J. Systems biology: experimental design FEBS J. 2009, 276, 923-942
8. Box, G. E. P.; Lucas, H. L. Design of experiments in non-linear situations Biometrika 1959, 46, 77-90
9. Box, G. E. P.; Hunter, W. G. Useful method for model-building Technometrics 1962, 4, 301-318
10. Asprey, S. P.; Macchietto, S. Designing robust optimal dynamic experiments J. Process Control 2002, 12, 545-556
11. Dette, H.; Melas, V. B.; Pepelyshev, A.; Strigul, N. Robust and efficient design of experiments for the Monod model J. Theor. Biol. 2005, 234, 537-550
12. Pronzato, L.; Walter, E. Robust experiment design via maximin optimization Math. Biosci. 1988, 89, 161-176
13. Goodwin, G. C.; Aguero, J. C.; Welsh, J. S.; Yuz, J. I.; Adams, G. J.; Rojas, C. R. Robust identification of process models from plant data J. Process Control 2008, 18, 810-820
14. Pronzato, L.; Walter, E. Robust experiment design via stochastic-approximation Math. Biosci. 1985, 75, 103-120
15. Chaloner, K.; Verdinelli, I. Bayesian experimental design: A review Stat. Sci. 1995, 10, 273-304
16. Frey, H. C.; Patil, S. R. Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods Risk Anal. 2002, 22, 553-578
17. Cacuci, D. G.; Ionescu-Bujor, M. A comparative review of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of large-scale systems-II: Statistical methods Nucl. Sci. Eng. 2004, 147, 204-217
18. Saltelli, A.; Tarantola, S.; Campolongo, F. Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modeling Stat. Sci. 2000, 15, 377-395
19. Saltelli, A.; Ratto, M.; Tarantola, S.; Campolongo, F. Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2006, 91, 1109-1125
20. Marino, S.; Hogue, I. B.; Ray, C. J.; Kirschner, D. E. A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 254, 178-196
21. Cho, K. H.; Shin, S. Y.; Kolch, W.; Wolkenhauer, O. Experimental design in systems biology, based on parameter sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo method: A case study for the TNF alpha-mediated NF-kappa B signal transduction pathway Simul.-Trans. Soc. Model. Simul. Int. 2003, 79, 726-739
22. Zi, Z. K.; Cho, K, H.; Sung, M. H.; Xia, X. F.; Zheng, J. S.; Sun, Z. R. In silico identification of the key components and steps in IFN-gamma induced JAK-STAT signaling pathway FEBS Lett. 2005, 579 (5) 1101-1108
23. Sidoli, F. R.; Mantalaris, A.; Asprey, S. P. Toward global parametric estimability of a large-scale kinetic single-cell model for mammalian cell cultures Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 868-878
24. Kontoravdi, C.; Asprey, S. P.; Pistikopoulos, E. N.; Mantalaris, A. Application of global sensitivity analysis to determine goals for design of experiments: An example study on antibody-producing cell cultures Biotechnol. Prog. 2005, 21, 1128-1135
25. Chu, Y.; Jayaraman, A.; Hahn, J. Parameter sensitivity analysis of IL-6 signalling pathways IET Syst. Biol. 2007, 1, 342-352
26. King, J. M. P.; Titchener-Hooker, N. J.; Zhou, Y. Ranking bioprocess variables using global sensitivity analysis: a case study in centrifugation Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2007, 30, 123-134
27. Brockmann, D.; Rosenwinkel, K. H.; Morgenroth, E. Practical identifiability of biokinetic parameters of a model describing two-step nitrification in biofilms Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2008, 101, 497-514
28. Chhatre, S.; Francis, R.; Newcombe, A. R.; Zhou, Y. H.; Titchener-Hooker, N.; King, J.; Keshavarz-Moore, E. Global Sensitivity Analysis for the determination of parameter importance in bio-manufacturing processes Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2008, 51, 79-90
29. Yue, H.; Brown, M.; He, F.; Jia, J. F.; Kell, D. B. Sensitivity Analysis and Robust Experimental Design of a Signal Transduction Pathway System Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2008, 40, 730-741
30. Martinez, E. C.; Cristaldi, M. D.; Grau, R. J. Design of Dynamic Experiments in Modeling for Optimization of Batch Processes Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 3453-3465
31. Rabitz, H.; Kramer, M.; Dacol, D. Sensitivity analysis in chemical-kinetics Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1983, 34, 419-461
32. Turanyi, T. Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems-Tools and applications J. Math. Chem. 1990, 5, 203-248
33. Saltelli, A.; Ratto, M.; Andres, T.; Campolongo, F.; Cariboni, J.; Gatelli, D.; Saisana, M.; Tarantola, S. Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer; John Wiley & Sons: England, 2008.
34. McKay, M. D. Nonparametric variance-based methods of assessing uncertainty importance Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1997, 57, 267-279
35. Sobol, I. M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates Math. Comput. Simul. 2001, 55, 271-280
36. Cukier, R. I.; Levine, H. B.; Shuler, K, E. Non-linear sensitivity analysis of multi-parameter model systems J. Comput. Phys. 1978, 26, 1-42
37. McRae, G. J.; Tilden, J. W.; Seinfeld, J. H. Global sensitivity analysis-A computational implementation of the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) Comput. Chem. Eng. 1982, 6, 15-25
38. Saltelli, A.; Tarantola, S.; Chan, K. P. S. A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output Technometrics. 1999, 41, 39-56
39. Robert, C. P.; Casella, G. Monte Carlo statistical methods, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, 2004.
40. Niederreiter, H. Quasi-Monte. Carlo methods and pseudo-random numbers Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 1978, 84, 957-1041
41. James, F. A review of pseudorandom number generator Comput. Phys. Commun. 1990, 60, 329-344
42. Kuipers, L.; Niederreiter, H. Uniform distribution of sequences; Wiley: New York, 1974.
43. Weyl, H. Mean motion Am. J. Math. 1938, 60, 889-896
44. Kiefer, J. Optimum experimental designs J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Stat. Methodol. 1959, 21, 272-319
45. Wynn, H. P. Results in the Theory and Construction of D-Optimum Experimental Designs J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B-Stat. Methodol. 1972, 34, 133-147
46. Stjohn, R. C.; Draper, N. R. D-optimality for regression designs-Review Technometrics 1975, 17, 15-23
47. Elfving, G. Optimum allocation in linear regression theory Ann. Math. Stat. 1952, 23, 255-262
48. Goodwin, G. C.; Payne, R. L. Dynamic System Identification: Experiment Design and Data Analysis; Academic Press: New York, 1977.
49. Hengl, S.; Kreutz, C.; Timmer, J.; Maiwald, T. Data-based identifiability analysis of non-linear dynamical models Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2612-2618
50. Balsa-Canto, E.; Rodriguez-Fernandez, M.; Banga, J. R. Optimal design of dynamic experiments for improved estimation of kinetic parameters of thermal degradation J. Food Eng. 2007, 82, 178-188
51. Helton, J. C.; Johnson, J. D.; Sallaberry, C. J.; Storlie, C. B. Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2006, 91, 10-11
52. Gelb, A.; Vander Velde, W. E. Multiple-input describing functions and nonlinear system design; New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
53. Vidyasagar, M. Nonlinear systems analysis, 2nd ed.; Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics: Philadelphia, 2002.
54. Fogler, H. S. Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering, 4th ed.; Prentice Hall PTR: Upper Saddle River, 2005.
55. van de Vusse, J. G. Plug-flow type reactor versus tank reactor Chem. Eng. Sci. 1964, 19, 994-997
56. Doyle, F. J.; Ogunnaike, B. A.; Person, R. K. Nonlinear model-based control using 2nd-order volterra models Automatica 1995, 31, 697-714
57. Hahn, J.; Edgar, T. F. A gramian based approach to nonlinearity quantification and model classification Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2001, 40, 5724-5731