Cognitive brain mapping for better or worse

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 321-329

  Smith, Donald F ^a  

^a NONE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COGNITION; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; PROCEDURES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; BRAIN MAPPING; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; COGNITION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 77955942903     PISSN: 00315982     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/pbm.0.0165     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arndt, S., et al. 1995. A comparison of approaches to the statistical analysis of [15O]H2O PET cognitive activation studies. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 7:155-68.
2. Boring, E. G. 1950. A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3. Cabeza, R., and L. Nyberg. 2000. Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. J Cogn Neurosci 12:1-47.
4. Clark-Carter, D. 2005. The importance of considering effect size and statistical power in research. In A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology, ed. J. Miles and P. Gilbert, 185-92. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
5. Curran-Everett, D. 2000. Multiple comparisons: Philosophies and illustrations. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 279: R1-R8.
6. Friston, K. 2002. Beyond phrenology: What can neuroimaging tell us about distributed circuitry? Annu Rev Neurosci 25:221-50.
7. Friston, K. J. 2009. Modalities, modes, and models in functional neuroimaging. Science 326:399-403.
8. Friston, K. J., et al. 1995. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach. Hum Brain Mapp 2:189-210.
9. Friston, K. J., et al. 1996. The trouble with cognitive subtraction. NeuroImage 4:97-104.
10. Friston, K. J., et al. 2006. A critique of functional localisers. NeuroImage 30:1077-87.
11. Gholipour, A., et al. 2007. Brain functional localization: A survey of image registration techniques. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26:427-51.
12. Gold, S., et al. 1997. Factors that influence effect size of 15O PET studies: A meta-analytic review. NeuroImage 5:280-91.
13. Haller, S., and A. J. Bartsch. 2009. Pitfalls in fMRI. Eur Radiol 19:2689-2706.
14. Ingle, D. J. 1972. Fallacies and errors in the wonderlands of biology, medicine, and Lewis Carroll. Perspect Biol Med 15:254-81.
15. Ioannidis J. P. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2: e124.
16. Lauritzen, M. 2001. Relationship of spikes, synaptic activity, and local changes of cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 21:1367-83.
17. Lauritzen, M., and L. Gold. 2003. Brain function and neurophysiological correlates of signals used in functional neuroimaging. J Neurosci 23:3972-80.
18. Lee, A., V Kannan, and A. E. Hillis. 2006. The contribution of neuroimaging to the study of language and aphasia. Neuropsychol Rev 16:171-83.
19. Lee, W. C, and H. Y. Huang. 2005. Data-dredging gene-dose analyses in association studies: Biases and their corrections. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:3004-6.
20. Lindner, M. D., et al. 2003. Analgesic effects of adrenal chromaffin allografts: Contingent on special procedures or due to experimenter bias? J Pain 4:64-73.
21. Logothetis, N. K. 2003. The underpinnings of the BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. J Neurosci 23:3963-71.
22. Lord, S. J., V. J. Gebski, and A. C. Keech. 2004. Multiple analyses in clinical trials: Sound science or data dredging? Med J Aust 181:452-54.
23. Matullo, G., M. Berwick, and P. Vineis. 2005. Gene-environment interactions: How many false positives? J Natl Cancer Inst 97:550-51.
24. McCabe, D P., and A. D. Castel. 2008. Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition 107:343-52.
25. Medawar, P. B. 1969. Induction and intuition in scientific thought. London: Methuen.
26. Miles, J., and P. Gilbert. 2005. A handbook of research methods for clinical and health psychology. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
27. Nature Neuroscience. 2001. Editorial. Analyzing functional imaging studies. Nat Neurosci 4:333.
28. Nickerson, R. S. 1998. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev Gen Psychol 2:175-220.
29. Poldrack, R. A. 2008. The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: Where do we stand? Curr Opin Neurobiol 18:223-27.
30. Posner, M. I. 1993. Seeing the mind. Science 262:673-74.
31. Posner, M. I. 2000. Exploiting cognitive brain maps. Brain Cogn 42:64-67.
32. Rips, L. J. 2002. Circular reasoning. Cogn Sci 26:767-95.
33. Savoy, R. L. 2005. Experimental design in brain activation MRI: Cautionary tales. Brain Res Bull 67:361-67.
34. Sirotin, Y. B., and A. Das. 2009. Anticipatory haemodynamic signals in sensory cortex not predicted by local neuronal activity. Nature 457:475-79.
35. Turner, R., et al. 1998. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain: Data acquisition and analysis. Exp Brain Res 123:5-12.
36. Van Horn, J. D, and R. A. Poldrack. 2009. Functional MRI at the crossroads. Int J Psychophysiol 73:3-9.
37. Wacholder, S., et al. 2004. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: An approach for molecular epidemiology studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:434-42.
38. Weisberg, D S., et al. 2008. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J Cogn Neurosci 20:470-77.
39. Worsley K. J. 2005. An improved theoretical P value for SPMs based on discrete local maxima. NeuroImage 28:1056-62.
40. Worsley, K., et al. 1996. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum Brain Mapp 4:58-73.