Two kinds of fMRI repetition suppression? Evidence for dissociable neural mechanisms

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 99, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 2877-2886

  Epstein, Russell A ^a,b   Parker, Whitney E ^a   Feiler, Alana M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Dept of Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NERVE POTENTIAL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OXYGEN; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REPRESSION, PSYCHOLOGY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 52049105024     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: 15221598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90376.2008     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abbott LF, Varela JA, Sen K, Nelson SB. Synaptic depression and cortical gain control. Science 275: 220-224, 1997.
2. Bar M, Kassam KS, Ghuman AS, Boshyan J, Schmid AM, Dale AM, Hamalainen MS, Marinkovic K, Schacter DL, Rosen BR, Halgren E. Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 449-454, 2006.
3. Biederman I, Gerhardstein PC. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 19: 1162-1182, 1993.
4. Buckner RL, Goodman J, Burock M, Rotte M, Koutstaal W, Schacter D, Rosen B, Dale AM. Functional-anatomic correlates of object priming in humans revealed by rapid presentation event-related fMRI. Neuron 20: 285-296, 1998.
5. Bulthoff HH, Edelman SY, Tarr MJ. How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cereb Cortex 5: 247-260, 1995.
6. Dobbins IG, Schnyer DM, Verfaellie M, Schacter DL. Cortical activity reductions during repetition priming can result from rapid response learning. Nature 428: 316-319, 2004.
7. Epstein R, Graham KS, Downing PE. Viewpoint-specific scene representations in human parahippocampal cortex. Neuron 37: 865-876, 2003.
8. Epstein R, Harris A, Stanley D, Kanwisher N. The parahippocampal place area: recognition, navigation, or encoding? Neuron 23: 115-125, 1999.
9. Epstein R, Kanwisher N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 392: 598-601, 1998.
10. Epstein RA, Higgins JS, Jablonski K, Feiler AM. Visual scene processing in familiar and unfamiliar environments. J Neurophysiol 97: 3670-3683, 2007a.
11. Epstein RA, Higgins JS, Thompson-Schill SL. Learning places from views: variation in scene processing as a function of experience and navigational ability. J Cogn Neurosci 17: 73-83, 2005.
12. Epstein RA, Parker WE, Feiler AM. Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. J Neurosci 27: 6141-6149, 2007b.
13. Friston K. A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360: 815-836, 2005.
14. Ganel T, Gonzalez CL, Valyear KF, Culham JC, Goodale MA, Kohler S. The relationship between fMRI adaptation and repetition priming. Neuroimage 32: 1432-1440, 2006.
15. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 14-23, 2006.
16. Grill-Spector K, Kushnir T, Edelman S, Avidan G, Itzchak Y, Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 24: 187-203, 1999.
17. Grill-Spector K, Malach R. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. Acta Psychol 107: 293-321, 2001.
18. Henson RN. Neuroimaging studies of priming. Prog Neurobiol 70: 53-81, 2003.
19. Henson RN, Rylands A, Ross E, Vuilleumeir P, Rugg MD. The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and hemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. Neuroimage 21: 1674-1689, 2004.
20. Henson R, Shallice T, Dolan R. Neuroimaging evidence for dissociable forms of repetition priming. Science 287: 1269-1272, 2000.
21. James TW, Gauthier I. Repetition-induced changes in BOLD response reflect accumulation of neural activity. Hum Brain Mapp 27: 37-46, 2006.
22. James TW, Humphrey GK, Gati JS, Menon RS, Goodale MA. Differential effects of viewpoint on object-driven activation in dorsal and ventral streams. Neuron 35: 793-801, 2002.
23. Kourtzi Z, Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293: 1506-1509, 2001.
24. Koutstaal W, Wagner AD, Rotte M, Maril A, Buckner RL, Schacter DL. Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex. Neuropsychologia 39: 184-199, 2001.
25. Krekelberg B, Boynton GM, van Wezel RJ. Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals. Trends Neurosci 29: 250-256, 2006.
26. Li L, Miller EK, Desimone R. The representation of stimulus-familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. J Neurophysiol 69: 1918-1929, 1993.
27. McMahon DB, Olson CR. Repetition suppression in monkey inferotemporal cortex: relation to behavioral priming. J Neurophysiol 97: 3532-3543, 2007.
28. Muller JR, Metha AB, Krauskopf J, Lennie P. Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images. Science 285: 1405-1408, 1999.
29. Naccache L, Dehaene S. The priming method: imaging unconscious repetition priming reveals an abstract representation of number in the parietal lobes. Cereb Cortex 11: 966-974, 2001.
30. Noguchi Y, Inui K, Kakigi R. Temporal dynamics of neural adaptation effect in the human visual ventral stream. J Neurosci 24: 6283-6290, 2004.
31. Pinel P, Dehaene S, Riviere D, LeBihan D. Modulation of parietal activation by semantic distance in a number comparison task. Neuroimage 14: 1013-1026, 2001.
32. Potter MC, Staub A, O'Connor DH. Pictorial and conceptual representation of glimpsed pictures. J Exp Psychol 30: 478-489, 2004.
33. Sawamura H, Orban GA, Vogels R. Selectivity of neuronal adaptation does not match response selectivity: a single-cell study of the FMRI adaptation paradigm. Neuron 49: 307-318, 2006.
34. Sayres R, Grill-Spector K. Object-selective cortex exhibits performance-independent repetition suppression. J Neurophysiol 95: 995-1007, 2006.
35. Schacter DL, Buckner RL. Priming and the brain. Neuron 20: 185-195, 1998.
36. Schnyer DM, Dobbins IG, Nicholls L, Schacter DL, Verfaellie M. Rapid response learning in amnesia: delineating associative learning components in repetition priming. Neuropsychologia 44: 140-149, 2006.
37. Sternberg S. Separate modifiability, mental modules, and the use of pure and composite measures to reveal them. Acta Psychol 106: 147-246, 2001.
38. Sternberg S. Separate modifiability and the search for processing modules. In: Functional Neuroimaging of Visual Cognition. Attention and Performance Series, edited by Duncan J and Kanwisher N. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 2004, vol. 20, p. 125-142.
39. Tarr MJ, Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cogn Psychol 21: 233-282, 1989.
40. van Turennout M, Ellmore T, Martin A. Long-lasting cortical plasticity in the object naming system. Nat Neurosci 3: 1329-1334, 2000.
41. Vuilleumier P, Henson RN, Driver J, Dolan RJ. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nat Neurosci 5: 491-499, 2002.
42. Wiggs CL, Martin A. Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8: 227-233, 1998.
43. Xu Y, Turk-Browne NB, Chun MM. Dissociating task performance from fMRI repetition attenuation in ventral visual cortex. J Neurosci 27: 5981-5985, 2007.