Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty acetabular cups to porous tantalum components. A 5-Year Follow-Up Study

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 865-872

  Fernández Fairen, Mariano ^a   Murcia, Antonio ^b,d   Blanco, Agustin ^c   Meroño, Antonio ^d   Ballester, Jorge ^e  

^a Instituto de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología de Barcelona   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL DE CABUEÑES   (Spain)

^c HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO DE BURGOS   (Spain)

^d Hospital Virgen del Rosell   (Spain)

^e UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Acetabular revision; Porous tantalum component; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

TANTALUM;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RATING SCALE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TANTALUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77955923010     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.07.027     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Chareancholvanich K., Tanchuling A., Seki T., et al. Cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of cemented hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 140.
2. Dearborn J.T., Harris W.H. Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:8.
3. Della Valle C.J., Berger R.A., Rosenberg A.G., et al. Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 96.
4. Garcia-Cimbrelo E. Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery: a 6- to 11-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:397.
5. Hungerford D.S., Jones L.C. The rationale of cementless revision of cemented arthroplasty failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988, 12.
6. Patel J.V., Masonis J.L., Bourne R.B., et al. The fate of cementless jumbo cups in revision hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:129.
7. Rosenberg A.G. Cementless acetabular components: the gold standard for socket revision. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(3 Suppl 1):118.
8. Silverton C.D., Rosenberg A.G., Sheinkop M.B., et al. Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. A follow-up note regarding results at seven to eleven years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996, 78:1366.
9. Templeton J.E., Callaghan J.J., Goetz D.D., et al. Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83-A:1706.
10. Weeden S.H., Paprosky W.G. Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws. A minimum twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:1266.
11. Whaley A.L., Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S. Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83-A:1352.
12. Berry D.J., Sutherland C.J., Trousdale R.T., et al. Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000, 154.
13. Chen W.M., Engh C.A., Hopper R.H., et al. Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:197.
14. Christie M.J., Barrington S.A., Brinson M.F., et al. Bridging massive acetabular defects with the triflange cup: 2- to 9-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 216.
15. Dennis D.A. Management of massive acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(3 Suppl 1):121.
16. DeWal H., Chen F., Su E., et al. Use of structural bone graft with cementless acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:23.
17. Garbuz D., Morsi E., Gross A.E. Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996, 78:693.
18. Gross A.E. Revision arthroplasty of the acetabulum with restoration of bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999, 198.
19. Joshi A.B., Lee J., Christensen C. Results for a custom acetabular component for acetabular deficiency. J Arthroplasty 2002, 17:643.
20. Saleh K.J., Jaroszynski G., Woodgate I., et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the use of structural acetabular allograft and reconstruction ring: a case series with a 10-year average follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2000, 15:951.
21. Schreurs B.W., Slooff T.J., Buma P., et al. Acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellised cancellous bone graft and cement. A 10- to 15-year follow-up of 60 revision arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:391.
22. Nehme A., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 201.
23. Gross A.E., Goodman S.B. Rebuilding the skeleton: the intraoperative use of trabecular metal in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20(4 Suppl 2):91.
24. Sporer S.M., Paprosky W.G. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2):83.
25. Sporer S.M., Paprosky W.G. Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21(6 Suppl 2):87.
26. Unger A.S., Lewis R.J., Gruen T. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:1002.
27. Weeden S.H., Schmidt R.H. The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(6 Suppl 2):151.
28. Levine B., la Valle C.J., Jacobs J.J. Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006, 14:646.
29. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G.J., Hacking S.A., et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999, 81:907.
30. Bobyn J.D., Toh K.K., Hacking S.A., et al. Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: a canine model. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:347.
31. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972, 54:61.
32. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969, 51:737.
33. Batlle-Gualda E., Esteve-Vives J., Piera M.C., et al. Adaptación transcultural del cuestionario WOMAC específico para atrosis de rodilla y cadera. Rev Esp Reumatol 1999, 26:38.
34. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833.
35. Biring G.S., Masri B.A., Greidanus N.V., et al. Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1446.
36. Amstutz H.C., Thomas B.J., Jinnah R., et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1984, 66:228.
37. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Frost S., et al. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001, 83:1125.
38. DeLee J.G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, 20.
39. Callaghan J.J., Salvati E.A., Pellicci P.M., et al. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985, 67:1074.
40. Brown E.C., Kelley S.S. Determination of the hip center. Revision total hip arthroplasty 1999, 320. Springer-Verlag, New York. J.V. Bono, J.C. McCarthy, T.S. Thornhill (Eds.).
41. Russotti G.M., Harris W.H. Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991, 73:587.
42. Puri L., Wixson R.L., Stern S.H., et al. Use of helical computed tomography for the assessment of acetabular osteolysis after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A:609.
43. Paprosky W.G., Perona P.G., Lawrence J.M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 1994, 9:33.
44. Schmalzried T.P., Harris W.H. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. Radiographic analysis of eighty-three primary hip replacements at a minimum of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992, 74:1130.
45. Gruen T.A., Poggie R.A., Lewallen D.G., et al. Radiographic evaluation of a monoblock acetabular component: a multicenter study with 2- to 5-year results. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:369.
46. Garbuz D., Morsi E., Mohamed N., et al. Classification and reconstruction in revision acetabular arthroplasty with bone stock deficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 98.
47. Goodman S., Saastamoinen H., Shasha N., et al. Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:436.
48. Macheras G.A., Papagelopoulos P.J., Kateros K., et al. Radiological evaluation of the metal-bone interface of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:304.