Divisive Primaries and Incumbent General Election Performance: Prospects and Costs in U.S. House Races

American Politics Research

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 931-955

  Johnson, Gregg B ^a   Petersheim, Meredith Joy ^a   Wasson, Jesse T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

divisive primaries; general elections; incumbency; primary dates; primary elections; prospects theory; U.S. House of Representatives

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955915207     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: 15523373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X09345823     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. America Votes. (various years). New York: Macmillan.
2. Ansolabehere, S., & Gerber, A. (1994). The mismeasure of campaign spending: Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics, 56, 1106-1118.
3. Ansolabehere, S., Hansen, J.M., Hirano, S., & Snyder, J.M., Jr. (2007). The incumbency advantage in U.S. primary elections. Electoral Studies, 26, 660-668.
4. Atkeson, L.R. (1998). Divisive primaries and general election outcomes: Another look at presidential campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 272-289.
5. Bernstein, R.A. (1977). Divisive primaries do hurt: U.S. Senate races, 1956-1972. American Political Science Review, 71, 540-545.
6. Born, R. (1981). The influence of House primary election divisiveness on general election margins, 1962-76. Journal of Politics, 43, 640-661.
7. Box-Steffensmeier, J.M. (1996). A dynamic analysis of the role of war chests in campaign strategy. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 352-371.
8. Brambor, T., Clark, W.R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 13, 1-20.
9. Canes-Wrone, B., Brady, D.W., & Cogan, J.F. (2002). Out of step, Out of office: Electoral accountability and house members' voting. American Political Science Review, 96, 127-140.
10. Carson, J.L. (2005). Strategy, selection, and candidate competition in U.S. House and senate elections. Journal of Politics, 67, 1-28.
11. Cox, G.W., & Katz, J.N. (1996). Why did the incumbency advantage grow? American Journal of Political Science, 40, 478-497.
12. Erikson, R.S., & Wright, G.C. (1997). Voters, candidates, and issues in congressional elections. In L. C. Dodd & B. I. Oppenheimer (Eds.), Congress reconsidered (4th ed., pp. 77-107). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
13. Feld, S.L., & Grofman, B. (2007). The Laakso-Taagepera index in a mean and variance framework. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 19, 101-106.
14. Hacker, A. (1965). Does a divisive primary harm a candidate's election chances? American Political Science Review, 59, 105-110.
15. Haggard, S., & McCubbins, M. D. (Eds.). (2001). Presidents, parliaments, and policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Herrnson, P.S., & Gimpel, J.G. (1995). District conditions and primary divisiveness in congressional elections. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 117-134.
17. Hetherington, M.J., Larson, B., & Globetti, S. (2003). The redistricting cycle and strategic candidate decisions in U.S. House races. Journal of Politics, 65, 1221-1234.
18. Jacobson, G.C. (1978). The effects of campaign spending in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 72, 469-491.
19. Jacobson, G.C. (1987). The marginals never vanished: Incumbency and competition in elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-82. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 126-141.
20. Jacobson, G.C. (1996). The 1994 House elections in perspective. Political Science Quarterly, 111, 203-223.
21. Jacobson, G.C. (2001). A House and Senate divided: The Clinton legacy and the congressional elections of 2000. Political Science Quarterly, 116, 5-27.
22. Jacobson, G.C., & Kernell, S. (1983). Strategy and choice in congressional elections (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
23. Jones, M.P. (1999). Electoral laws and the effective number of candidates in presidential elections. Journal of Politics, 61, 171-184.
24. Kenney, P.J. (1988). Sorting out the effects of primary divisiveness in congressional and senatorial elections. Western Political Quarterly, 41, 765-777.
25. Kenney, P.J., & Rice, T.W. (1984). The effect of primary divisiveness in gubernatorial and senatorial elections. Journal of Politics, 46, 904-915.
26. Laakso, M., & Taagepera, R. (1979). Effective number of parties: A measure with application to Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 12, 3-27.
27. Lazarus, J. (2005). Unintended consequences: Anticipation of general election outcomes and primary election divisiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30, 435-461.
28. Lazarus, J. (2008). Incumbent vulnerability and challenger entry in statewide elections. American Politics Research, 36, 108-129.
29. Lengle, J.I. (1980). Divisive presidential primaries and party electoral prospects, 1932-1976. American Politics Quarterly, 8, 261-277.
30. Lengle, J.I., Owen, D., & Sonner, M. (1995). Divisive nominating mechanisms and Democratic party electoral prospects. Journal of Politics, 57, 370-383.
31. Mainwaring, S., & Shugart, M. S. (Eds.). (1997). Presidentialism and democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
32. Peterson, D.A., & Djupe, P.A. (2005). When primary campaigns go negative: The determinants of campaign negativity. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 45-54.
33. Pierson, J.E., & Smith, T.B. (1975). Primary divisiveness and general election success: A re-examination. Journal of Politics, 37, 555-562.
34. Romero, D.W. (2003). Divisive primaries and the House district vote: A pooled analysis. American Politics Research, 31, 178-190.
35. Southwell, P.L. (1986). The politics of disgruntlement: Nonvoting and defection among supporters of nomination losers, 1968-1984. Political Behavior, 8, 81-95.
36. Stone, W.J., & Maisel, L.S. (2003). The not-so-simple calculus of winning: Potential U.S. House candidates' nominations and general election prospects. Journal of Politics, 65, 951-977.
37. Stone, W.J., Maisel, L.S., & Maestas, C. (2004). Quality counts: Extending the strategic politician model of incumbent deterrence American Journal of Political Science, 48, 479-495.
38. Stratmann, T. (2005). Some talk: Money in politics. A (partial) review of the literature. Public Choice, 124, 135-156.
39. Ware, A. (1979). Divisive primaries: The important questions. British Journal of Political Science, 9, 237-250.
40. Zaller, J.R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
41. Zaller, J.R., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions versus revealing preferences. American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579-616.