Evaluation of multiple implant-bone parameters on stress characteristics in the mandible under traumatic loading conditions

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 461-472

  Guan, Hong ^a   Van Staden, Rudi ^a   Loo, Yew Chaye ^b   Johnson, Newell ^b   Ivanovski, Saso ^b   Meredith, Neil ^c  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c Neoss Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bone density; Finite element analysis; Implant diameter; Implant length; Masticatory force; Stress characteristics; Traumatic loading

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE FRACTURE; MASTICATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; YOUNG MODULUS;

BITE FORCE; BONE DENSITY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL OCCLUSION, TRAUMATIC; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULUS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR FRACTURES; OSSEOINTEGRATION;

EID: 77955906609     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91: 20-25.
2. Iplikçioglu H, Akça K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting threeunit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002;30: 41-46.
3. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5: 254-262.
4. van Staden RC, Guan H, Loo YC. Application of the finite element method in dental implant research. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2006;9: 257-270.
5. Simşek B, Erkmen E, Yilmaz D, Eser A. Effects of different interimplant distances on the stress distribution around endosseous implants in the posterior mandible: A 3D finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys 2006;28: 199-213.
6. Nomura T, Powers MP, Katz JL, Saito C. Finite element analysis of a transmandibular implant. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;80: 370-376.
7. Stegaroiu R, Watanabe N, Tanaka M, Ejiri S, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Peri-implant stress analysis in simulation models with or without trabecular bone structure. Int J Prosthodont 2006;19: 40-42.
8. Guan H, van Staden RC, Loo YC, Johnson NW, Ivanovski S, Meredith N. Influence of bone and dental implant parameters on stress distribution in mandible: A finite element study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24: 866-876.
9. Neoss Limited. Neoss Implant System Surgical Guidelines. Harrogate, UK: Neoss Limited, 2006.
10. Choi AH, Ben-Nissan B, Conway RC. Three-dimensional modelling and finite element analysis of the human mandible during clenching. Aust Dent J 2005;50: 42-48.
11. Lai H, Zhang F, Zhang B, Yang C, Xue M. Influence of percentage of osseointegration on stress distribution around dental implants. Chin J Dent Res 1998;1(3): 7-11.
12. Mellal A, Wiskott HW, Botsis J, Scherrer SS, Belser UC. Stimulating effect of implant loading on surrounding bone. Comparison of three numerical models and validation by in vivo data. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15: 239-248.
13. Gallas MM, Abeleira MT, Fernandez JR, Burguera M. Threedimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage. Eur J Orthod 2005;27: 12-16.
14. Chun HJ, Park DN, Han CH, Heo SJ, Heo MS, Koak JY. Stress distributions in maxillary bone surrounding overdenture implants with different overdenture attachments. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32: 193-205.
15. Geng JP, Ma QS, Xu W, Tan KB, Liu GR. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31: 233-239.
16. Natali AN, Pavan PG, Ruggero AL. Analysis of bone-implant interaction phenomena by using a numerical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17: 67-74.
17. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 251-262.
18. Strand7 Theoretical Manual. Sydney, Australia: Strand7 Software, 2004.
19. Burstein AH, Reilly DT, Martens M. Aging of bone tissue: Mechanical properties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58: 82-86.
20. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, Ohyama T. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91: 234-240.
21. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: A 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14: 173-180.
22. Misch CE. Implant design considerations for the posterior regions of the mouth. Implant Dent 1999;8: 376-386.
23. Tawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21: 275-282.
24. Zhang L, Zhou Y, Meng W. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the correlation between lengths and diameters of the implants of fixed bridges with proper stress distribution. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2000;18: 229-231.
25. Meijer HJ, Starmans FJ, Steen WH, Bosman F. Loading conditions of endosseous implants in an edentulous human mandible: A three-dimensional, finite-element study. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23: 757-763.
26. Currey JD. The Mechanical Adaptation of Bones. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, 1984: 3-36.