Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 123, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 245-255

  Gierach, Gretchen L ^a,g   Loud, Jennifer T ^b,g   Chow, Catherine K ^b,h   Prindiville, Sheila A ^a,g   Eng Wong, Jennifer ^c,g   Soballe, Peter W ^d,g   Giambartolomei, Claudia ^b,i   Mai, Phuong L ^b,g   Galbo, Claudia E ^d,j   Nichols, Kathryn ^e,g   Calzone, Kathleen A ^a,g   Vachon, Celine ^f,g   Gail, Mitchell H ^b,g   Greene, Mark H ^b,g  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^e WESTAT   (United States)

^f Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

^g Westat Corporation ^*  (United States)

^h Washington Radiology Associates   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^j WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Breast cancer risk; Breast cancer screening; Gene, BRCA1; Gene, BRCA2; Genetic predisposition to disease; Mammographic density

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN; BRCA2 PROTEIN; SELECTIVE ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MODULATOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MENARCHE; MENOPAUSE; NULLIPARA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; UNITED STATES; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; MIDDLE AGED; MUTATION; RADIOGRAPHY; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENE;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENES, BRCA1; GENES, BRCA2; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MUTATION; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 77955772783     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-0749-7     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. NF Boyd GA Lockwood JW Byng DL Tritchler MJ Yaffe 1998 Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7 12 1133 1144 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FotFSgsw%3D%3D 9865433
2. NF Boyd H Guo LJ Martin L Sun J Stone E Fishell RA Jong G Hislop A Chiarelli S Minkin MJ Yaffe 2007 Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 3 227 236 10.1056/NEJMoa062790 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnslSjsg%3D%3D 17229950 (Pubitemid 46143226)
3. C Byrne C Schairer J Wolfe N Parekh M Salane LA Brinton R Hoover R Haile 1995 Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status J Natl Cancer Inst 87 21 1622 1629 10.1093/jnci/87.21.1622 1:STN:280:DyaK28%2Fis1aluw%3D%3D 7563205
4. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler DL (2001) Mammographic density as a marker of susceptibility to breast cancer: a hypothesis. IARC Sci Publ 154:163-169
5. LJ Martin NF Boyd 2008 Mammographic density-potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence Breast Cancer Res 10 1 201 10.1186/bcr1831 18226174
6. LE Kelemen TA Sellers CM Vachon 2008 Can genes for mammographic density inform cancer aetiology? Nat Rev Cancer 8 10 812 823 10.1038/nrc2466 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFCrtbnF 18772892
7. E Wilkinson C Clopton J Gordonson R Green A Hill MC Pike 1977 Mammographic parenchymal pattern and the risk of breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 59 5 1397 1400 1:STN:280:DyaE1c%2FgvVSltg%3D%3D 909098
8. PM Krook T Carlile W Bush MH Hall 1978 Mammographic parenchymal patterns as a risk indicator for prevalent and incident cancer Cancer 41 3 1093 1097 10.1002/1097-0142(197803)41:3<1093::AID-CNCR2820410343>3.0.CO;2-H 1:STN:280:DyaE1c7ks1Wqsg%3D%3D 638951 (Pubitemid 8312198)
9. VL Ernster ST Sacks CA Peterson RJ Schweitzer 1980 Mammographic parenchymal patterns and risk factors for breast cancer Radiology 134 3 617 620 1:STN:280:DyaL3c7itlWjsw%3D%3D 7355207
10. JB Buchanan BF Weisberg JP Sandoz LA Gray Sr KI Bland 1981 Selected prognostic variables for mammographic parenchymal patterns Cancer 47 9 2135 2137 10.1002/1097-0142(19810501)47:9<2135::AID-CNCR2820470905>3.0.CO;2-B 1:STN:280:DyaL3M7os1Snuw%3D%3D 7226106 (Pubitemid 11098580)
11. F de Waard JJ Rombach HJ Collette B Slotboom 1984 Breast cancer risk associated with reproductive factors and breast parenchymal patterns J Natl Cancer Inst 72 6 1277 1282 6587148
12. J Brisson NL Sadowsky JA Twaddle AS Morrison P Cole F Merletti 1982 The relation of mammographic features of the breast to breast cancer risk factors Am J Epidemiol 115 3 438 443 1:STN:280:DyaL387lslWrtw%3D%3D 7064978
13. AF Saftlas JN Wolfe RN Hoover LA Brinton C Schairer M Salane M Szklo 1989 Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk Am J Epidemiol 129 3 518 526 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7jt1Ggsg%3D%3D 2916545
14. NF Boyd GA Lockwood LJ Martin JA Knight RA Jong E Fishell JW Byng MJ Yaffe DL Tritchler 1999 Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer among subjects with a family history of this disease J Natl Cancer Inst 91 16 1404 1408 10.1093/jnci/91.16.1404 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzot1ersQ%3D%3D 10451446
15. E Ziv J Shepherd R Smith-Bindman K Kerlikowske 2003 Mammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 95 7 556 558 10.1093/jnci/95.7.556 12671024
16. AB Crest EJ Aiello ML Anderson DS Buist 2006 Varying levels of family history of breast cancer in relation to mammographic breast density (United States) Cancer Causes Control 17 6 843 850 10.1007/s10552-006-0026-6 16783612
17. IH Gravelle JC Bulstrode DY Wang RD Bulbrook JL Hayward 1980 The relation between radiographic features and determinants of risk of breast cancer Br J Radiol 53 626 107 113 10.1259/0007-1285-53-626-107 1:STN:280: DyaL3c7ns1Sjsg%3D%3D 7370490
18. J Brisson 1991 Family history of breast cancer, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk Epidemiology 2 6 440 444 10.1097/00001648-199111000-00009 1:STN:280:DyaK387mt1yisQ%3D%3D 1838700
19. Z Kaufman WI Garstin R Hayes MJ Michell M Baum 1991 The mammographic parenchymal patterns of nulliparous women and women with a family history of breast cancer Clin Radiol 43 6 385 388 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80565-3 1:STN:280:DyaK3MzgtVOrsA%3D%3D 2070577
20. AF Saftlas RN Hoover LA Brinton M Szklo DR Olson M Salane JN Wolfe 1991 Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer Cancer 67 11 2833 2838 10.1002/1097-0142(19910601)67:11<2833::AID-CNCR2820671121>3.0.CO;2-U 1:STN:280:DyaK3M3itlCltQ%3D%3D 2025849
21. B Breuer DG Miller M Salane JN Wolfe 1992 Mammographic parenchymal patterns and family history of breast cancer Cancer 69 2 602 603 10.1002/1097-0142(19920115)69:2<602::AID-CNCR2820690255>3.0.CO;2-8 1:STN:280:DyaK38%2FpslSjtw%3D%3D 1728395
22. CM Vachon TA Sellers EE Carlson JM Cunningham CA Hilker RL Smalley DJ Schaid LE Kelemen FJ Couch VS Pankratz 2007 Strong evidence of a genetic determinant for mammographic density, a major risk factor for breast cancer Cancer Res 67 17 8412 8418 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1076 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD2sXpvFKisrY%3D 17804758 (Pubitemid 47395181)
23. M Kataoka A Antoniou R Warren J Leyland J Brown T Audley D Easton 2009 Genetic models for the familial aggregation of mammographic breast density Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18 4 1277 1284 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0568 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXktFCgtrg%3D 19336563
24. JN Wolfe S Albert S Belle M Salane 1980 Familial influences on breast parenchymal patterns Cancer 46 11 2433 2437 10.1002/1097-0142(19801201)46: 11<2433::AID-CNCR2820461123>3.0.CO;2-E 1:STN:280:DyaL3M%2FmsValtA%3D%3D 7438019
25. JS Pankow CM Vachon CC Kuni RA King DK Arnett DM Grabrick SS Rich VE Anderson TA Sellers 1997 Genetic analysis of mammographic breast density in adult women: evidence of a gene effect J Natl Cancer Inst 89 8 549 556 10.1093/jnci/89.8.549 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3mtVGhsQ%3D%3D 9106643
26. CM Vachon RA King LD Atwood CC Kuni TA Sellers 1999 Preliminary sibpair linkage analysis of percent mammographic density J Natl Cancer Inst 91 20 1778 1779 10.1093/jnci/91.20.1778 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2Fhtlejsg%3D%3D 10528030
27. G Haars PA van Noord CH van Gils PH Peeters DE Grobbee 2004 Heritable aspects of dysplastic breast glandular tissue (DY) Breast Cancer Res Treat 87 2 149 156 10.1023/B:BREA.0000041621.48575.9b 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvmslSjtw%3D%3D 15377839 (Pubitemid 39237791)
28. J Kaprio A Alanko L Kivisaari CG Standertskjold-Nordenstam 1987 Mammographic patterns in twin pairs discordant for breast cancer Br J Radiol 60 713 459 462 10.1259/0007-1285-60-713-459 1:STN:280:DyaL2s3hsVymsg%3D%3D 3580756
29. NF Boyd GS Dite J Stone A Gunasekara DR English MR McCredie GG Giles D Tritchler A Chiarelli MJ Yaffe JL Hopper 2002 Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer N Engl J Med 347 12 886 894 10.1056/NEJMoa013390 12239257
30. MA Helvie MA Roubidoux BL Weber SD Merajver 1997 Mammography of breast carcinoma in women who have mutations of the breast cancer gene BRCA1: initial experience Am J Roentgenol 168 6 1599 1602 1:STN:280:DyaK2szht1aqtg%3D%3D
31. J Chang WT Yang HF Choo 1999 Mammography in Asian patients with BRCA1 mutations Lancet 353 9169 2070 2071 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)77887-9 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzgtlWgtA%3D%3D 10376643
32. M Tilanus-Linthorst L Verhoog IM Obdeijn K Bartels M Menke-Pluymers A Eggermont J Klijn H Meijers-Heijboer T van der Kwast C Brekelmans 2002 A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography Int J Cancer 102 1 91 95 10.1002/ijc.10666 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XnvFCru7Y%3D 12353239
33. LJ Hamilton AJ Evans AR Wilson N Scott EJ Cornford SE Pinder HN Khan RD Macmillan 2004 Breast imaging findings in women with BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast carcinoma Clin Radiol 59 10 895 902 10.1016/j.crad.2004.03.013 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvot1Cmsw%3D%3D 15451348 (Pubitemid 39276928)
34. R Kaas R Kroger JL Peterse AA Hart SH Muller 2006 The correlation of mammographic-and histologic patterns of breast cancers in BRCA1 gene mutation carriers, compared to age-matched sporadic controls Eur Radiol 16 12 2842 2848 10.1007/s00330-006-0385-0 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28nosFOmsg%3D%3D 16924440 (Pubitemid 44823938)
35. Z Huo ML Giger OI Olopade DE Wolverton BL Weber CE Metz W Zhong SA Cummings 2002 Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers Radiology 225 2 519 526 10.1148/radiol.2252010845 12409590
36. H Li ML Giger Z Huo OI Olopade L Lan BL Weber I Bonta 2004 Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location Med Phys 31 3 549 555 10.1118/1.1644514 15070253 (Pubitemid 38381017)
37. G Mitchell AC Antoniou R Warren S Peock J Brown R Davies J Mattison M Cook I Warsi DG Evans D Eccles F Douglas J Paterson S Hodgson L Izatt T Cole L Burgess 2006 EMBRACE collaborators, Eeles R, and Easton DF, Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers Cancer Res 66 3 1866 1872 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3368 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XpsVektQ%3D%3D 16452249 (Pubitemid 43259974)
38. JT Loud EB Beckjord K Nichols J Peters R Giusti MH Greene 2009 Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer BMC Women's Health 9 1 20 10.1186/1472-6874-9-20 19602282
39. JT Loud AC Thiebaut AD Abati AC Filie K Nichols D Danforth R Giusti SA Prindiville MH Greene 2009 Ductal lavage in women from BRCA1/2 families: is there a future for ductal lavage in women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18 4 1243 1251 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI- 08-0795 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXktFCgsbc%3D 19336560
40. D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al (2003) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS-mammography, 4th edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA
41. PB Lam PM Vacek BM Geller HB Muss 2000 The association of increased weight, body mass index, and tissue density with the risk of breast carcinoma in Vermont Cancer 89 2 369 375 10.1002/1097-0142(20000715)89:2<369::AID- CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-J 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czptlSisw%3D%3D 10918168 (Pubitemid 30489886)
42. PM Vacek BM Geller 2004 A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13 5 715 722 15159301
43. E Ziv J Tice R Smith-Bindman J Shepherd S Cummings K Kerlikowske 2004 Mammographic density and estrogen receptor status of breast cancer Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13 12 2090 2095 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVOjsLjN 15598766
44. JW Byng NF Boyd E Fishell RA Jong MJ Yaffe 1994 The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities Phys Med Biol 39 10 1629 1638 10.1088/0031-9155/39/ 10/008 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crnsFahuw%3D%3D 15551535
45. CM Vachon KR Brandt K Ghosh CG Scott SD Maloney MJ Carston VS Pankratz TA Sellers 2007 Mammographic breast density as a general marker of breast cancer risk Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16 1 43 49 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0738 17220330 (Pubitemid 46174262)
46. NF Boyd JW Byng RA Jong EK Fishell LE Little AB Miller GA Lockwood DL Tritchler MJ Yaffe 1995 Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study J Natl Cancer Inst 87 9 670 675 10.1093/jnci/87.9.670 1:STN:280: DyaK2M3ntFOjsg%3D%3D 7752271
47. MH Gail LA Brinton DP Byar DK Corle SB Green C Schairer JJ Mulvihill 1989 Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually J Natl Cancer Inst 81 24 1879 1886 10.1093/jnci/81.24.1879 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FnvF2kuw%3D%3D 2593165
48. KF Hoskins A Zwaagstra M Ranz 2006 Validation of a tool for identifying women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer in population-based screening Cancer 107 8 1769 1776 10.1002/cncr.22202 16967460 (Pubitemid 44582945)
49. MH Greene M Piedmonte D Alberts M Gail M Hensley Z Miner PL Mai J Loud G Rodriguez J Basil J Boggess PE Schwartz JL Kelley KE Wakeley L Minasian S Skates 2008 A prospective study of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and longitudinal CA-125 screening among women at increased genetic risk of ovarian cancer: design and baseline characteristics: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17 3 594 604 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2703 18349277 (Pubitemid 351469209)