Genetic models for the familial aggregation of mammographic breast density

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1277-1284

  Kataoka, Masako ^a   Antoniou, Antonis ^b   Warren, Ruth ^a   Leyland, Jean ^b   Brown, Judith ^b   Audley, Tina ^b   Easton, Doug ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FAMILIAL DISEASE; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC RISK; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HERITABILITY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHIC BREAST DENSITY; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SEGREGATION ANALYSIS; SIBLING;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, GENETIC; POSTMENOPAUSE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SIBLINGS; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC;

EID: 66649125208     PISSN: 10559965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0568     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Wolfe JN. Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1976;126:1130-1137
2. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:670-675
3. Warner E, Lockwood G, Tritchler D, Boyd NF. The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. Cancer Detect Prev 1992;16:67-72.
4. Wolfe JN, Saftlas AF, Salane M. Mammographicpa renchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;148:1087-1092 (Pubitemid 17083062)
5. Martin KE, Helvie MA, Zhou C, et al. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. Radiology 2006;240:656-665 (Pubitemid 44267320)
6. Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, et al. Mammographicdensity and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12:332-338 (Pubitemid 36427994)
7. Vachon CM, Kuni CC, Anderson K, Anderson VE, Sellers TA. Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:653-662 (Pubitemid 30636365)
8. Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, et al. High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case-control study. Br J Cancer 1999;81:1257-1261
9. Boyd N, Martin L, Stone J, et al. A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:1048-1053 (Pubitemid 35192656)
10. Sala E, Warren R, McCann J, et al. High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns, hormone replacement therapy and other risk factors: a case-control study. Int J Epidemiol 2000;29:629-636 (Pubitemid 30612228)
11. Cuzick J, Warwick J, Pinney E, Warren RM, Duffy SW. Tamoxifen and breast density in women at increased risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:621-628 (Pubitemid 38584986)
12. Byrne C, Schairer C, Brinton LA, et al. Effects of mammographic density and benign breast disease on breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2001;12:103-110 (Pubitemid 32165267)
13. Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:886-894
14. Stone J, Dite GS, Gunasekara A, et al. The heritability of mammographically dense and nondense breast tissue. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:612-617
15. Vachon CM, King RA, Atwood LD, Kuni CC, Sellers TA. Preliminary sibpair linkage analysis of percent mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:1778-1779 (Pubitemid 29518775)
16. Mitchell G, Antoniou AC, Warren R, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Res 2006;66:1866-1872 (Pubitemid 43259974)
17. Lee E, Haiman CA, Ma H, et al. The role of established breast cancer susceptibility loci in mammographic density in young women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17:258-260
18. Tamimi RM, Cox D, Kraft P, et al. Breast cancer susceptibility loci and mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R66.
19. Pankow JS, Vachon CM, Kuni CC, et al. Genetic analysis of mammographicbreast density in adult women: evidence of a gene effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997;89:549-556 (Pubitemid 27172944)
20. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities . Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1629-1638 (Pubitemid 24306719)
21. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Tritchler DL, Yaffe MJ. Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1998;7:1133-1144 (Pubitemid 29001671)
22. Liang KY, Zeger SL. Regression analysis for correlated data. Annu Rev Public Health 1993;14:43-68. (Pubitemid 23161711)
23. White HA. heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticit. Econometrica 1980;48:817-830
24. Rogers WH. Regression SE s in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin 1993;13:19-23.
25. Lange K, Weeks D, Boehnke M. Programs for Pedigree Analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, dGENE. Genet Epidemiol 1988;5:471-472
26. Lange K. An approximate model of polygenic inheritance. Genetics 1997;147:1423-1430 (Pubitemid 27467480)
27. Antoniou AC, Pharoah PD, McMullan G, et al. Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study. Genet Epidemiol 2001;21:1-18. (Pubitemid 32619211)
28. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automatic Control 1974;19:716-726.
29. Torres-Mejia G, De Stavola B, Allen DS, et al. Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the Guernsey prospective studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:1052-1059 (Pubitemid 40656447)
30. Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, et al. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:386-395 (Pubitemid 47073482)
31. Stone J, Gurrin LC, Byrnes GB, et al. Mammographic density and candidate gene variants: a twins and sisters study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16:1479-1484 (Pubitemid 47076882)
32. Tamimi RM, Cox DG, Kraft P, et al. Common genetic variation in IGF1, IGFBP-1, and IGFBP-3 in relation to mammographic density: a cross-sectional study. Breast Cancer Res 2007;9:R18.
33. Vachon CM, Sellers TA, Carlson EE, et al. Strong evidence of a genetic determinant for mammographic density, a major risk factor for breast cancer. Cancer Res 2007;67:8412-8418 (Pubitemid 47395181)