The correlation of mammographic-and histologic patterns of breast cancers in BRCA1 gene mutation carriers, compared to age-matched sporadic controls

European Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2842-2848

  Kaas, R ^a   Kroger, R ^a   Peterse, J L ^a   Hart, A A M ^a   Muller, S H ^a  

^a ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

BRCA1 carriers; Breast cancers; Spiculated mammographic lesion; Sporadic controls; Surveillance; Well defined mammographic lesion

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN;

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER INFILTRATION; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GENE MUTATION; HETEROZYGOTE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEMALE; GENES, BRCA1; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MUTATION; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE;

EID: 37849188881     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0385-0     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (1997) Pathology of familial breast cancer: Differences between breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and sporadic cases. Lancet 349:1505-1510
2. Lakhani SR, Jacquemier J, Sloane JP, Gusterson BA, Anderson TJ, Vijver MJ van der et al (1998) Multifactorial analysis of differences between sporadic breast cancers and cancers involving BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998 90:1138-1145
3. Armes JE, Egan AJM, Southey MC, Dite GS, McCredie MRE, Giles GG et al (1998) The histologic phenotypes of breast carcinoma occurring before age 40 years in women with and without BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations. Cancer 83:2335-2345
4. Lidereau R, Eisinger F, Champeme M-H, Nogues C, Bieche I, Birnbaum D et al (2000) Major improvement in the efficacy of BRCA1 mutation screening using morphoclinical features of breast cancer. Cancer research 60:1206-1210
5. Nixon AJ, Neuberg D, Hayes DF, Gelman R, Connolly JL, Schnitt S et al (1994) Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:888-894
6. Sidoni A, Cavaliere A, Bellezza G, Scheibel M, Bucciarelli E (2003) Breast cancer in young women: Clinicopathological features and biological specificity. Breast 12:247-250
7. Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A, Hoogenraad WJ, Horiot J-C, Jager JJ et al (2003) Can patient-, treatment- and pathology-related characteristics explain the high local recurrence rate following breast-conserving therapy in young patients? Eur J Cancer 39:932-944
8. Lakhani SR, Vijver MJ vd, Jacquemier J, Anderson TJ, Osin PP, McGuffog L et al (2002) The pathology of familial breast cancer: Predictive value of immunohistochemical markers estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 20:2310-2318
9. Gils CH van, Otten JDM, Verbeek ALM, Hendriks JHCL (1995) Short communication: Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. Br J Radiol 68:1133-1135
10. Huo Z, Giger Ml, Olopade OI, Wolverton DE, Weber BL, Metz CE et al (2002) Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology 225:519-526
11. Kaas R, Kroger R, Hendriks JHCL, Besnard APE, Koops W, Pameijer FA et al (2004) The significance of circumscribed malignant mammographic masses in the surveillance of BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers. Eur Radiol 14:1647-1653
12. Malone KE, Daling JR, Neal C, Suter NM, O'Brien C, Cushing-Haugen K et al (2000) Frequency of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in a population-based sample of young breast carcinoma cases. Cancer 88:1393-1402
13. Papelard H, Bock GH de, Eijk R van, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Cornelisse CJ, Devilee P, Tollenaar RAEM (2000) Prevalence of BRCA1 in a hospital-based population of Dutch breast cancer patients. BrJCancer 83:719-724
14. Tabar L, Dean PB. Teaching atlas of mammography. Second revised edition (1985) Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York
15. Mammography 4th edition (2003). In: ACR Breast imaging reporting and data system, Breast imaging atlas. Reston VA American College of Radiology
16. Kopans DB (1998) Breast imaging, second edition Lippincott-Raven publishers, Philadelphia
17. Tabar L, Tot T, Dean PB (2005) Breast Cancer. The art and science of early detection with mammography Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York
18. Hamilton LJ, Evans AJ, Wilson ARM, Scott N, Cornford EJ, Pinder SE et al (2004). Breast imaging findings in women with BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast carcinoma. Clinical Radiology 59:895-902
19. Tilanus-Linthorst M, Verhoog L, Obdeijn IM, Bartels K, Menke-Pluymers M, Eggermont A et al (2002) A BRCA1/2 mutation, high breast density and prominent pushing margins of a tumor independently contribute to a frequent false-negative mammography. Int J Cancer 102:91-95
20. Zonderland HM, Pope Jr ThL, Nieborg AJ (2004) The positive predictive value of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) as a method of quality assessment in breast imaging in a hospital population. Eur Radiol 14:1743-1750