Phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis of the genus Phytoseiulus (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Zoologica Scripta

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 450-461

  Kanouh, Mohamad ^a   Tixier, Marie Stéphane ^a   Okassa, Mireille ^a   Kreiter, Serge ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACARI; PHYTOSEIIDAE; PHYTOSEIULUS; PHYTOSEIULUS LONGIPES; PHYTOSEIULUS MACROPILIS; PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS;

EID: 77955762973     PISSN: 03003256     EISSN: 14636409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2010.00439.x     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alfaro M E, Zoller S, Lutzoni F. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2003, 20:255-266.
2. Athias-Henriot C. Phytoseiidae et Aceosejidae (Acarina: Gamasina) d'Algérie. IV. Genre Typhlodromus Scheuten, 1857. Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Naturelle de l'Afrique du Nord 1960, 51:62-107.
3. Athias-Henriot C. Contribution à l'étude des Amblyseius paléarctiques (Acariens Anactinotriches, Phytoseiidae). Bulletin Scientifique de Bourgogne 1966, 24:181-230.
4. Athias-Henriot C. Nouvelles notes sur les Amblyseiini. III. Sur le genre Cydnodromus: Redéfinition, composition (Parasitiformes, Phytoseiidae). Entomophaga 1977, 22:61-73.
5. Baker A S. A new species of the mite genus Mesoseiulus (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) associated with thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera). Journal of Zoology 1990, 222:617-622.
6. Brown J H, Lomolino M V. Biogeography 1998, 560. 2nd Edn, p, Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates
7. Chant D A, McMurtry J A. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): Part 1. Neoseiulini new tribe. International Journal of Acarology 2003a, 29(1):3-46.
8. Chant D A, McMurtry J A. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Part II. The tribe Kampimodromini Kolodochka. International Journal of Acarology 2003b, 29(3):179-224.
9. Chant D A, McMurtry J A. A review of the subfamily Amblyseiinae Muma (Acari: Phytoseiidae): part VIII. The tribes Macroseiini Chant, Denmark and Baker, Phytoseiulini n. tribe, Africoseiulini n. tribe and Indoseiulini Ehara and Amano. International Journal of Acarology 2006a, 32:13-25.
10. Chant D A, McMurtry J A. Illustrated Keys and Diagnoses for the Genera and Subgenera of the Phytoseiidae of the World (Acari: Mesostigmata) 2007, p, Michigan, Indira Publishing House
11. Chant D A, Yoshida-Shaul E. A world review of the pyri species group in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 1987, 65(7):1770-1804.
12. Congdon B D. The family Phytoseiidae (Acari) in western Washington State with descriptions of three new species. Internat. International Journal of Acarology 2002, 28(1):3-27.
13. Cruickshank R H. Molecular markers for the phylogenetics of mites and ticks. Systematic and Applied Acarology 2002, 7:3-14.
14. Dabert M. DNA markers in the phylogenetics of the Acari. Biological Letters 2006, 43(2):97-107.
15. Denmark H A, Schicha E. Revision of the genus Phytoseiulus Evans (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology 1983, 9:27-35.
16. Farris J S. A successive approximations approach to character weighting. Systematic Zoology 1969, 18:374-385.
17. Farris J S. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 1989, 5:417-419.
18. Ferreira J, Eshuis B, Janssen A. Domatia reduce larval cannibalism in predatory mites. Ecological Entomology 2008, 33:374-379.
19. Gonzales R H, Schuster R O. Especies de la Familia Phytoseiidae on Chile. I. (Acarina: Mesostigmata). Boletim Tecnico. Estacion Experimental Agronomica. Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Agronomia 1962, 16:1-35.
20. Humphries C J, Parenti L R. Cladistic biogeography. Interpreting Patterns of Plant and Animal Distribution 1999, Hallam A, Rosen B RWhitmore T C. Eds, 2nd Edn, p, Oxford Biogeography Series, New York, Oxford University Press
21. Hurtado M A, Ansaloni T, Cros-Arteil S, Jacas J A, Navajas M. Sequence analysis of the ribosomal internal transcribed spacers region in spider mites (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) occurring in citrus orchards in Eastern Spain: use for species discrimination. Annals of Applied Biology 2008, 153(2):167-174.
22. Jeyaprakash A, Hoy M A. Mitochondrial 12S rDNA sequence used to design a molecular ladder assay to identify six commercially available phytoseiids (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biological Control 2002, 25(2):136-142.
23. Jordal B H, Hewitt G M. The origin and radiation of macaronesian beetles breeding in Euphorbia: The relative importance of multiple data partitions and population sampling. Systematic Biology 2004, 53:711-734.
24. Karban R, Loeb G E, Walker M A, Thaler J. Abundance of phytoseiid mites on Vitis species: effects of leaf hairs, domatia, prey abundance plant phylogeny. Experimental and Applied Acarology 1995, 19:189-197.
25. Klimov P B, O'Connor B M. Origin and higher-level relationships of psoroptidian mites (Acari: Astigmata: Psoroptidia): evidence from three nuclear genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2008, 47(3):1135-1156.
26. Klompen H, Lekveishvili M, Black W C. Phylogeny of Parasitiform mites (Acari) based on rRNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2007, 43:936-951.
27. Kolodochka L A. The predaceous phytoseiid mites (Parasitiformes: Phytoseiidae) from the forest steppe of the Ukranian SSR. Part II. Species of the genera Kampimodromus, Paraseiulus, Typhlodromus, Typhloctonus, Anthoseius, Phytoseius [in Russian]. Vestnik Zoologii 1974, 1:25-29.
28. Kolodochka L A. Manual for the Identification of Plant-Inhabiting Phytoseiid Mites [in Russian]. 1978, p, Naukova Dumka, Akademii Nauk Ukrainian SSR, Instituta Zoologii
29. Kostiainen T S, Hoy M A. The Phytoseiidae as Biological Control Agents of Pest Mites and Insects. A Bibliography 1996, p, Monograph 17, Gainesville, University of Florida, Agricultural Experiment Station, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences
30. Lewis P O. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 2001, 50(6):913-925.
31. McGregor E A. Two new mites in the genus Typhlodromus (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 1954, 53:89-92.
32. McMurtry J A. Some predaceous mites (Phytoseiidae) on citrus in the Mediterranean region. Entomophaga 1977, 22:19-30.
33. McMurtry J A, Croft B A. Life-styles of phytoseiid mites and their roles in biological control. Annual Review of Entomology 1997, 42:291-321.
34. Mickevich M F, Farris S J. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Systematic Zoology 1981, 30:351-370.
35. Moraes G J de, McMurtry J A, Denmark H A. A Catalog of the Mite Family Phytoseiidae. References to Taxonomy, Synonymy, Distribution and Habitat 1986, p, EMBRAPA - DDT
36. Moraes G J de, McMurtry J A, Denmark H A, Campos C B. A revised catalog of the mite family Phytoseiidae. Zootaxa 2004, 434:1-494.
37. Muma M H, Denmark H A, De Leon D. Phytoseiidae of Florida. Arthropods of Florida and Neighboring Land Areas, 6 1970, p, Florida, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Plant Industry
38. Navajas M, Fenton B. The application of molecular markers in the study of diversity in acarology: a review. Experimental and Applied Acarology 2000, 24:751-774.
39. Navajas M, Lagnel J, Fauvel G, Moraes G J de. Sequence variation of Ribosomal Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) in commercially important Phytoseiidae mites. Experimental and Applied Acarology 1999, 23:851-859.
40. Navajas M, Thistlewood H, Lagnel J, Marshall D, Tsagkarakou A, Pasteur N. Releases of the predatory mite Neoseiulus fallacis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Canada: the fate of introductions assessed by pyrethroid resistance and allozyme markers. Biology Control 2001, 20:191-198.
41. Niogret J, Nicot A. Combined approach using morphology and ITS-sequences for description of three new species of Macrocheles (Acari: Macrochelidae). Zootaxa 2008, 1873:39-49.
42. Niogret J, Nicot A, De Stordeur E, Bertrand M. Combination of morphological characters and ITS-sequence to characterize a new Macrocheles species (Acari: Mesostigmata). Zootaxa 2007, 1386:19-29.
43. Nylander J A A, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J P, Nieves-Aldrey J L. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Systematic Biology 2004, 53:47-67.
44. Okassa M, Tixier M S, Cheval B, Kreiter S. Molecular and morphological evidence for a new species status within the genus Euseius (Acari: Phytoseiidae): consequences for taxonomy. Canadian Journal of Zoology 2009, 87:689-698.
45. Pickett K M, Randle C P. Strange bayes indeed: uniform topological prior imply non-uniform clade priors. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2005, 34:203-211.
46. Posada D, Crandall K A. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 1998, 14:817-818.
47. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J P. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford) 2003, 19:1572-1574.
48. Sabelis M W. Evolution of plant-predator mutualisms: an introduction to the symposium. Acarology IX Symposia Ohio Biological Survey 1999, 205-213. Needham G RMitchell RHorn D JWelbourn W C. Eds, Columbus, Ohio, Ohio Biological Survey
49. Schultz F W. Some aspects of the ecology of Amblyseius (Amblyseius) teke Prichard and Baker and A. (Mesoseiulus) longipes (Evans) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Phytophylactica 1974, 6:1-10.
50. Seelmann L, Auer A, Hoffmann D, Schausberger P. Leaf pubescence mediates intraguild predation between predatory mites. Oikos 2007, 116:807-817.
51. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 1999, 16:1114-1116.
52. Simmons M P, Pickett K M, Miya M. How meaningful are Bayesian support values? Molecular Biology and Evolution 2004, 21:188-199.
53. STATISTICA - (logiciel de l'analyse de données), Version 8.1 [computer program] 2008, France, StatSoft
54. Suzuki Y, Glazko G V, Nei M. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2002, 99:16138-16143.
55. Swirski E, Amitai S. Further phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) of Israel, with a description of one new species. The Israel Journal of Agricultural Research 1965, 15:123-138.
56. Swofford D L. PAUP - Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Ver. 4. 0. Beta [computer software] 2002, Sunderland, MA, Sinauer Associates
57. Takahashi F, Chant D A. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Phytoseiulus Evans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). I. Geographic distribution. International Journal of Acarology 1993a, 19:15-22.
58. Takahashi F, Chant D A. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Phytoseiulus Evans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). II. Taxonomic review. International Journal of Acarology 1993b, 19:23-37.
59. Takahashi F, Chant D A. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Phytoseiulus Evans (Acari: Phytoseiidae). II. Cladistic analysis. International Journal of Acarology 1993c, 19:233-241.
60. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007, 24:1596-1599.
61. Templeton A R. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 1983, 37:221-244.
62. Thiele K. The Holy Grail of the perfect character: The cladistic treatment of morphometric data. Cladistics 1993, 9:275-304.
63. Tixier M S, Kreiter S, Barbar Z, Ragusa S, Cheval B. The status of two cryptic species: Typhlodromus exhilaratus Ragusa and Typhlodromus phialatus Athias-Henriot (Acari: Phytoseiidae): consequences for taxonomy. Zoologica Scripta 2006a, 35(2):115-122.
64. Tixier M S, Kreiter S, Ferragut F, Cheval B. The suspected synonymy of Kampimodromus hmiminai and Kampimodromus adrianae (Acari: Phytoseiidae): morphological and molecular investigations. Canadian Journal of Zoology 2006b, 84(8):1216-1222.
65. Tixier M S, Kreiter S, Croft B A, Cheval B. Kampimodromus aberrans (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from USA: morphological and molecular assessment of its density. Bulletin of Entomological Research 2008, 98:125-134.
66. Tixier M S, Ferrero M, Okassa M, Guichou S, Kreiter S. Morphological and molecular analyses of four populations of Phytoseiulus longipes (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) in accordance with their feeding behaviour. Bulletin of Entomological Research 2010, 10.1017/S0007485309990617, Epub ahead of print. doi
67. Tselila B D, Melamed S, Gerson U, Morin S. ITS2 sequences as barcodes for identifying and analyzing spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 2007, 41:169-181.
68. Van der Merwe G G. A taxonomic study of the family Phytoseiidae (Acari) in South Africa with contributions to the biology of two species. Entomology Memoirs, South Africa Department of Agricultural Technical Services 1968, 18:1-198.
69. Wallace A R. The Geographical Distribution of Animals 1876, Washington, Smithsonian Institution Press
70. Walter D E. Leaf surface structure and the distribution of Phytoseius mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in South-eastern Australian forests. Australian Journal of Zoology 1992, 40:593-603.
71. Walter D E. Living on leaves: mites, tomenta, and leaf domatia. Annual Review of Entomology 1996, 41:101-114.
72. Walter D E, O'Dowd D J. Leaf morphology and predators: effect of leaf domatia on the abundance of predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environmental Entomology 1992, 21(3):478-484.
73. Yoshida-Shaul E, Chant D A. Ontogenetic development of setae in two species groups in the genus Typhlodromus Scheuten (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). International Journal of Acarology 1983, 9:81-89.
74. Yoshida-Shaul E, Chant D A. A review of the species of Phytoseiidae (Acari: Gamasina) described by A. C. Oudemans. Acarologia 1995a, 36(1):3-19.