Eco1 is important for DNA damage repair in S. cerevisiae

Cell Cycle

Volumn 9, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 3335-3347

  Lu, Shuai ^a,b   Goering, Matthew ^a,b   Gard, Scarlett ^a   Xiong, Bo ^a   McNairn, Adrian J ^a   Jaspersen, Sue L ^a,b   Gerton, Jennifer L ^a,b  

^a STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acetyltransferase; Cohesin; Double strand break; Recombination; Roberts syndrome

Indexed keywords

ACYLTRANSFERASE; BLEOMYCIN; COHESIN; DNA; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; HYDROXYUREA; PROTEIN ECO1; RAD50 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMOSOME ARM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE MUTATION; HETEROZYGOSITY; MEIOSIS; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN PURIFICATION; ROBERTS SYNDROME; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SOMATIC CROSSING OVER; X RAY; YEAST;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 77955741279     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.9.16.12673     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Toth A, Ciosk R, Uhlmann F, Galova M, Schleiffer A, Nasmyth K. Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication. Genes Dev 1999; 13:320-33.
2. Ciosk R, Shirayama M, Shevchenko A, Tanaka T, Toth A, Nasmyth K. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol Cell 2000; 5:243-54.
3. Vega H, Waisfisz Q, Gordillo M, Sakai N, Yanagihara I, Yamada M, et al. Roberts syndrome is caused by mutations in ESCO2, a human homolog of yeast ECO1 that is essential for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Nat Genet 2005; 37:468-70.
4. Deardorff MA, Kaur M, Yaeger D, Rampuria A, Korolev S, Pie J, et al. Mutations in cohesin complex members SMC3 and SMC1A cause a mild variant of cornelia de Lange syndrome with predominant mental retardation. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 80:485-94.
5. Musio A, Selicorni A, Focarelli ML, Gervasini C, Milani D, Russo S, et al. X-linked Cornelia de Lange syndrome owing to SMC1L1 mutations. Nat Genet 2006; 38:528-30.
6. Krantz ID, McCallum J, DeScipio C, Kaur M, Gillis LA, Yaeger D, et al. Cornelia de Lange syndrome is caused by mutations in NIPBL, the human homolog of Drosophila melanogaster Nipped-B. Nat Genet 2004; 36:631-5.
7. Tonkin ET, Wang TJ, Lisgo S, Bamshad MJ, Strachan T. NIPBL, encoding a homolog of fungal Scc2-type sister chromatid cohesion proteins and fly Nipped-B, is mutated in Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Nat Genet 2004; 36:636-41.
8. McNairn AJ, Gerton JL. Cohesinopathies: One ring, many obligations. Mutat Res 2008; 647:103-11.
9. Liu J, Krantz ID. Cohesin and human disease. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008; 9:303-20.
10. McNairn AJ, Gerton JL. The chromosome glue gets a little stickier. Trends Genet 2008; 24:382-9.
11. Gard S, Light W, Xiong B, Bose T, McNairn AJ, Harris B, et al. Cohesinopathy mutations disrupt the subnuclear organization of chromatin. J Cell Biol 2009; 187:455-62.
12. Guacci V, Koshland D, Strunnikov A. A direct link between sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome condensation revealed through the analysis of MCD1 in S. cerevisiae. Cell 1997; 91:47-57.
13. Donze D, Adams CR, Rine J, Kamakaka RT. The boundaries of the silenced HMR domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 1999; 13:698-708.
14. Rollins RA, Morcillo P, Dorsett D. Nipped-B, a Drosophila homologue of chromosomal adherins, participates in activation by remote enhancers in the cut and Ultrabithorax genes. Genetics 1999; 152:577-93.
15. Adelfalk C, Janschek J, Revenkova E, Blei C, Liebe B, Gob E, et al. Cohesin SMC1beta protects telomeres in meiocytes. J Cell Biol 2009; 187:185-99.
16. Klein F, Mahr P, Galova M, Buonomo SB, Michaelis C, Nairz K, et al. A central role for cohesins in sister chromatid cohesion, formation of axial elements and recombination during yeast meiosis. Cell 1999; 98:91-103.
17. Sjogren C, Nasmyth K. Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Biol 2001; 11:991-5.
18. Unal E, Arbel-Eden A, Sattler U, Shroff R, Lichten M, Haber JE, et al. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol Cell 2004; 16:991-1002.
19. Strom L, Lindroos HB, Shirahige K, Sjogren C. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol Cell 2004; 16:1003-15.
20. Strom L, Karlsson C, Lindroos HB, Wedahl S, Katou Y, Shirahige K, et al. Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 2007; 317:242-5.
21. Kim ST, Xu B, Kastan MB. Involvement of the cohesin protein, Smc1, in Atm-dependent and independent responses to DNA damage. Genes Dev 2002; 16:560-70.
22. Unal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Koshland D. DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science 2007; 317:245-8.
23. Kim BJ, Li Y, Zhang J, Xi Y, Yang T, Jung SY, et al. Genome-wide reinforcement of cohesin binding at pre-existing cohesin sites in response to ionizing radiation in human cells. J Biol Chem 2010.
24. Heidinger-Pauli JM, Unal E, Koshland D. Distinct targets of the Eco1 acetyltransferase modulate cohesion in S phase and in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 2009; 34:311-21.
25. Heidinger-Pauli JM, Unal E, Guacci V, Koshland D. The kleisin subunit of cohesin dictates damage-induced cohesion. Mol Cell 2008; 31:47-56.
26. Unal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Kim W, Guacci V, Onn I, Gygi SP, et al. A molecular determinant for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 2008; 321:566-9.
27. Ben-Shahar TR, Heeger S, Lehane C, East P, Flynn H, Skehel M, et al. Eco1-dependent cohesin acetylation during establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Science 2008; 321:563-6.
28. Zhang J, Shi X, Li Y, Kim BJ, Jia J, Huang Z, et al. Acetylation of Smc3 by Eco1 is required for S phase sister chromatid cohesion in both human and yeast. Mol Cell 2008; 31:143-51.
29. Ivanov D, Schleiffer A, Eisenhaber F, Mechtler K, Haering CH, Nasmyth K. Eco1 Is a Novel Acetyltransferase that Can Acetylate Proteins Involved in Cohesion. Curr Biol 2002; 12:323-8.
30. Gordillo M, Vega H, Trainer AH, Hou F, Sakai N, Luque R, et al. The molecular mechanism underlying Roberts syndrome involves loss of ESCO2 acetyltransferase activity. Hum Mol Genet 2008; 17:2172-80.
31. van der Lelij P, Godthelp BC, van Zon W, van Gosliga D, Oostra AB, Steltenpool J, et al. The cellular phenotype of Roberts syndrome fibroblasts as revealed by ectopic expression of ESCO2. PLoS ONE 2009; 4:6936.
32. Brands A, Skibbens RV. Ctf7p/Eco1p exhibits acetyltransferase activity - but does it matter? Curr Biol 2005; 15:50-1.
33. Onn I, Guacci V, Koshland DE. The zinc finger of Eco1 enhances its acetyltransferase activity during sister chromatid cohesion. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:6126-34.
34. Straight AF, Belmont AS, Robinett CC, Murray AW. GFP tagging of budding yeast chromosomes reveals that protein-protein interactions can mediate sister chromatid cohesion. Curr Biol 1996; 6:1599-608.
35. Rowland BD, Roig MB, Nishino T, Kurze A, Uluocak P, Mishra A, et al. Building sister chromatid cohesion: smc3 acetylation counteracts an antiestablishment activity. Mol Cell 2009; 33:763-74.
36. Weinert TA, Kiser GL, Hartwell LH. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev 1994; 8:652-65.
37. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996; 271:357-60.
38. Weinert TA, Hartwell LH. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 1988; 241:317-22.
39. de la Torre-Ruiz MA, Green CM, Lowndes NF. RAD9 and RAD24 define two additive, interacting branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in budding yeast normally required for Rad53 modification and activation. EMBO J 1998; 17:2687-98.
40. Barbera MA, Petes TD. Selection and analysis of spontaneous reciprocal mitotic cross-overs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:12819-24.
41. Casper AM, Mieczkowski PA, Gawel M, Petes TD. Low levels of DNA polymerase alpha induce mitotic and meiotic instability in the ribosomal DNA gene cluster of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:1000105.
42. Laloraya S, Guacci V, Koshland D. Chromosomal addresses of the cohesin component Mcd1p. J Cell Biol 2000; 151:1047-56.
43. Glynn EF, Megee PC, Yu HG, Mistrot C, Unal E, Koshland DE, et al. Genome-Wide Mapping of the Cohesin Complex in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 2004; 2:259.
44. Watanabe Y, Nurse P. Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis. Nature 1999; 400:461-4.
45. Heidinger-Pauli JM, Mert O, Davenport C, Guacci V, Koshland D. Systematic reduction of cohesin differentially affects chromosome segregation, condensation and DNA repair. Curr Biol 2010; 20:957-63.
46. McMurray MA, Gottschling DE. An age-induced switch to a hyper-recombinational state. Science 2003; 301:1908-11.