Citation behaviour of information science students II: Postgraduate students

Education for Information

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-30

  Clarke, Maria Elizabeth ^a   Oppenheim, Charles ^b  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIES; ERROR ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; STUDENTS; WEBSITES;

ELECTRONIC FORMATS; ELECTRONIC JOURNALS; ELECTRONIC MATERIALS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 33748489559     PISSN: 01678329     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/EFI-2006-24101     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. L.M. Baird and C. Oppenheim, Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science 20(1) (1994), 2-15.
2. A.K. Bandyopadhyay and A. Nandi, Citation analysis of references use in doctoral dissertations of political science, Herald of Library Science 40(3/4) (2001), 192-200.
3. A.E. Bayer and J. Folger, Some correlates of a citation measure of productivity in science, Sociology of Education 39(1) (1966), 381-390.
4. S.J. Bell, Business Connection: weaning them from the web: teaching online to the MBA Internet generation, Database 21(3) (1998), 67-70.
5. S.P. Benning and S.C. Speer, Incorrect citations: a comparison of library literature with medical literature, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association [online], 81(1) (1993), 56-58. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi? artid=225731&blobtype=pdf, [accessed 10.5.05].
6. S.J. Bensman, Bibliometric laws and library usage as social phenomena, Library Research 4(3) (1982), 279-312.
7. A. Booth, Using research in practice: a checker's career? Health Information and Libraries Journal [online], 21(4) (2004), 269-272. http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2004.00538.x, [accessed 9.7.05].
8. C. Borgman et al., Scholarly communication and bibliometrics, 1990, London: Sage.
9. R.N. Broadus, The literature of the social sciences: a survey of citation studies, International social science journal 23(2) (1971), 236-237.
10. R.N. Broadus, An investigation of the validity of bibliographic citations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 34(2) (1983), 132-135.
11. T.A. Brooks, Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations, Journal of the American Society far Information Science 36(4) (1985), 223-229.
12. T.A. Brooks, Evidence of complex citer motivations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 37(1) (1986), 34-36.
13. L. Buttlar, Information in library and information science doctoral research, Library & Information Science Research 21(2) (1999), 227-245.
14. D.E. Chubin and S.D. Moitra, Content analysis of references: adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science 5(1) (1975), 423-441.
15. J. Cole and S. Cole, Measuring the quality of sociological research: problems in the use of the science citation index, American Sociologist 6(1) (1971), 23-29.
16. J. Cole and S. Cole, Social stratification in science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
17. B. Cronin, The need for a theory of citing, Journal of Documentation 37(1) (1981), 16-24.
18. B. Cronin, The citation process: the role and significance of citations in scientific communication, London: Taylor Graham, 1984.
19. P.M. Davis, The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behaviour: a 2000 update, College and Research Libraries 63(1) (2002), 53-60.
20. P.M. Davis, Effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behaviour: guiding student scholarship in a networked age, Portal: Libraries and the Academy 3(1) (2003), 41-51.
21. P.M. Davis and S.A. Cohen, The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behaviour 1996-1999, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(4) (2001), 309-314.
22. J.E. D'Esposito and R.M. Gardner, University student's perceptions of the Internet: an exploratory study, The Journal of Academic Librarianship 25(6) (1999), 456-461.
23. V. Diodato, Dictionary of bibliometrics, New York: The Haworth Press, 1994.
24. S.E. Ebersole, On their own: students' academic use of the commercialized web, Library Trends 53(4) (2005), 530-538.
25. S. Edwards, Citation analysis as a collection development tool: a bibliometric study of polymer science these and dissertations, Serials Review [online], 25(1) (1999), 11-20. www.Sciencedirect.com/science, [accessed 9.6.03].
26. K. Fescemyer, Information-seeking behaviour of undergraduate geography students, Research Strategies [online], 17(4) (2001), 307-317. www.sciencedirect.com/science, [accessed 6.5.03].
27. G.R. Freimer and M.M. Perry, Student problems with documentation, The Journal of Academic Librarianship 11(6) (1986), 350-353.
28. C.O. Frost, The use of citations in literary research: a preliminary classification of citation functions, Library Quarterly 49(4) (1979), 399-414.
29. E. Garfield, Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities, New York: John Wiley & Son, 1979.
30. G.N. Gilbert, Referencing as persuasion, Social Studies of Science 7(1) (1977), 113-122.
31. M.A. Gillette and C. Videon, Seeking quality on the Internet: a case study of composition students' works cited, Teaching English in the Two-Year College 26(2) (1998), 189-194.
32. J.R. Griffiths and P. Brophy, Student searching behaviour and the Web: use of academic resources and Google, Library Trends 53(4) (2005), 539-554.
33. D.J. Grimes and C.H. Boening, Worries with the Web: a look at student use of web resources, College and Research Libraries 62(1) (2001), 11-23.
34. S.D. Herring, Faculty acceptance of the World Wide Web for student research, College and Research Libraries 62(3) (2001), 251-258.
35. S.D. Herring, Using the World Wide Web for research: are faculty satisfied? Journal of Academic Librarianship 27(3) (2001), 213-219.
36. R. Hjerppe, An outline of bibliometrics and citation analysis: report TRITA-LIB-6014, Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology Library, 1978.
37. K. Hovde, Check the citation: library instruction and student paper bibliographies, Research Strategies [online], 17(1) (2000), 3-9. 〈www.sciencedirect.com/science〉, [accessed 6.5.03].
38. P.O. Jenkins, News from the field: they're not just using web sites: a citation study of 116 student papers, College, and Research Libraries News 63(3) (2002), 164.
39. K.E. Joswick, Library materials use by college freshman: a citation analysis of composition papers, College and Undergraduate Libraries 1(1) (1994), 43-66.
40. J. Keene, From abstract to relevant: encouraging access to journals, Library and Information Research 28(89) (2004), 2-12.
41. J.R. Kraus, Citation patterns of advanced undergraduate students in biology, 2000-2002, Science and Technology Libraries 22(3/4) (2002), 161-179.
42. J. Kraus and P. Fisher, Citation analysis of undergraduate biology department honors papers at the University of Denver, 2000, 〈http://www.du. edu/~jokraus/ALA2000/biocites.html〉, [accessed 15.4.04].
43. J.D. Kushkowski, K.A. Parsons and W.H. Wiese, Master's and doctoral thesis citations: analysis and trends of a longitudinal study, Portal: Libraries and the. Academy 3(3) (2003), 459-479.
44. S. Lawrence et al., Computing practices: persistence of web references in scientific research, Computer 34(2) (2001), 26-31.
45. M. Liu, Progress in documentation the complexities of citation practice a review of citation studies, Journal of Documentation 49(4) (1993), 370-408.
46. M.H. MacRoberts and B.R. MacRoberts, Brief communication: Another test of the normative theory of citing, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 38(4) (1987), 305-306.
47. M.H. MacRoberts and B.R. MacRoberts, Author motivation for not citing influences: a methodological note, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 39(6) (1988), 432-433.
48. M.H. MacRoberts and B.R. MacRoberts, Problems for citation analysis: a critical review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40(5) (1989), 342-349.
49. R.M. Magrill and G. St. Clair, Undergraduate term paper citation patterns by disciplines and level of course, Collection Management 12(3/4) (1990), 25-56.
50. D. Malone and C. Videon, Assessing undergraduate use of electronic resources: a quantitative analysis of works cited, Research Strategies 15(3) (1997), 151-158.
51. K.O. May, Abuses of citation indexing, Science 156(1) (1967), 890-891.
52. A.J. Meadows, Communicating Research, London: Academic Press, 1998.
53. R.K. Merton, The Matthew effect in science, Science 159(1) (1968), 56-63.
54. H.F. Moed and M. Vriens, Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis, Journal of Information Science 15(2) (1989), 95-107.
55. M.J. Moravcsik and P. Murugesan, Some results on the function and quality of citations, Social Studies of Science 5(1) (1975), 86-92.
56. D.H. Morse and W.A. Clintworth, Comparing patterns of print and electronic journal use in an academic health science library, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, [online], 28(4) (2000). 〈http://www.library. ucsb.edu/istl/00-fall/refereed.html〉, [accessed 5.5.04].
57. C.R. Myers, Journal citation and scientific eminence in contemporary psychology, American Psychologist 25(11) (1970), 1041-1048.
58. F. Narin and E.S. Whitlow, Measurement of scientific cooperation and co authorship of science in CEC-related areas of science, (Vol. 1), Luxembourg: Commission of the European Communities, 1990.
59. M. Norris and C. Oppenheim, Citation counts and the Research Assessment Exercise V: Archaeology and the 2001 RAE, Journal of Documentation 59(6) (2003), 709-730.
60. R.B. Okity, A citation analysis of education dissertations at the Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria, Collection Building 22(4) (2003), 158-161.
61. C. Oppenheim, Do citations count? Citation indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE), Serials: the Journal of the United Kingdom Serials Group 9(2) (1996), 155-161.
62. C. Oppenheim, The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment Exercise rating for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology, Journal of Documentation 53(5) (1997), 477-487.
63. C. Oppenheim and S.P. Renn, Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited, Journal of the American Society for information Science 29(5) (1978), 226-231.
64. C. Oppenheim and R. Smith, Student citation practices in an information science department, Education for Information 19(4) (2001), 299-323.
65. B.C. Peritz and D. Sor, The use of libraries by graduate students in psychology as indicated by citations, Collection Management 12(3/4) (1990), 11-23.
66. R. Plomp, Statistical reliability of citation frequency as an indicator of scientific Impact, Scientometrics 17(1/2) (1989), 71-91.
67. R. Plomp, The significance of the number of highly cited papers as an indicator of scientific prolificacy, Scientometrics 19(3/4) (1990), 185-197.
68. N.N. Pope, Accuracy of references in ten library science journals, RQ 32(2) (1992), 240-243.
69. R. Foyer, Inaccurate references in significant journals of science, Bulletin of Medical Library Association [online], 67(4) (1979), 396-398. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=226958&blobtype=pdf, [accessed 9.7.05].
70. D.J. Price, de Solla, Little science, big science, New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.
71. D.J. Price, de Solla, Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience, in: Communication among scientists and engineers, C. Nelson and D. Pollock, eds, Massachusetts: Health Lexington Books, 1970, pp. 3-22.
72. G. St. Clair and R.M. Magrill, Incomplete citations in undergraduate term papers from four campuses, RQ 30(1) (1990), 75-81.
73. G. St. Clair and R.M. Magrill, Undergraduate term paper citations, College and Research Libraries News 51(1) (1990), 25-28.
74. A. Sandison, Thinking about citation analysis, Journal of Documentation 45(1) (1989), 59-64.
75. L.B. Seng and P. Willett, The citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools, Journal of Information Science 21(1) (1995), 68-71.
76. M.V. Simkin and V.P. Roychowdhury, Read before you cite! Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/ftp/cond-mat/papers/0212/0212043.pdf, 2003.
77. M.V. Simkin and V.P. Roychowdhury, Do copied citations create renowned papers? Annals of Improbable Research 11(1) (2005), 24-29.
78. H. Small, On the shoulders of Robert Merton: towards a normative theory of citations, Scientometrics 60(1) (2004), 71-79.
79. J.H. Sweetland, Errors in bibliographic citations: a continuing problem, The Library Quarterly 59(4) (1989), 291-304.
80. M. Sylvia and M. Lesher, What journal do psychology graduate students need? A citation analysis of thesis references, College and Research Libraries 56(4) (1995), 313-318.
81. J. Thomas, Graduate student use of journals: abibliometric study of psychology theses, Behavioural and Social Sciences Librarian 12(1) (1993), 1-7.
82. C.E. Thompson, Using citation analysis to analyze library and information science journal characteristics, College and Research Library News 52(7) (1991), 439-441.
83. M. Thompson, Incorrect citations: a problem and a challenge for librarians, Australian Academic and Research Libraries 9(1) (1976), 45-47.
84. L. Ursin, E.B. Lindsay and C.M. Johnson, Assessing library instruction in the freshman seminar: a citation analysis study. Reference Service Review [online], 32(3) (2004), 284-292. www.emeraldinsight.com/0090-7324.html, [accessed 15.4.04].
85. J.A. Virgo, A statistical procedure for evaluating the importance of scientific papers, The Library Quarterly 47(4) (1977), 415-430.
86. J.M. Wehmeyer and S. Wehmeyer, The comparative importance of book: clinical psychology in health sciences library, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 87(2) (1999), 187-191.
87. M. Weinstock, Citation indexes, in: Essays of an information scientist, E. Garfield, Philadelphia: ISI Press, 1971, pp. 188-195.
88. A.N. Zainab and S.S. Goi, Characteristics of citations used by humanities researchers, Malaysia Journal of Library and Information Science 2(2) (1977), 19-36.