Exploring individual differences in raybased selection: Strategies and traits

Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 163-170

  Wingrave, Chadwick A ^a   Tintner, Ryan ^c   Walker, Bruce N ^c   Bowman, Doug A ^a   Hodges, Larry F ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aptitude tests; Individual differences; Selection; User strategies; Virtual environments

Indexed keywords

APTITUDE TEST; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; USER STRATEGIES; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS;

CORRELATION METHODS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; RAY TRACING; SELECTION;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 28444488987     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. BOWMAN, D. AND HODOES, L. 1997. AN EVALUATION OF TECHNIQUES FOR GRABBING AND MANIPULATING REMOTE OBJECTS IN IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM SYMPOSIUM ON INTERACTIVE 3D GRAPHICS, 35-38.
2. BOWMAN, D. 1999. INTERACTION TECHNIQUES FOR COMMON TASKS IN IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: DESIGN, EVALUATION AND APPLICATION. GEORGIA TECH DISSERTATION.
3. BOWMAN, D., DAVIS, E., BADRE, A., AND HODGES, L. 1999 MAINTAINING SPATIAL ORIENTATION DURING TRAVEL IN AN IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT. PRESENCE: TELEOPERATORS AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, 8, 6, PP. 618-631.
4. BOWMAN, D. JOHNSON, D. HODOES, L. 2001 TESTBED EVALUATION OF VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION TECHNIQUES. PRESENCE, VOL 10, NO 1, 75-95.
5. BOWMAN, D., WINGRAVE, C., CAMPBELL, J., LY, V. 2001 USING PINCHGLOVES FOR BOTH NATURAL AND ABSTRACT INTERACTION TECHNIQUES IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS. HCI INTERNATIONAL.
6. BOWMAN, D. AND WINGRAVE, C., 2001, DESIGN AND EVALUATION OF MENU SYSTEMS FOR IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS. PROCEEDINGS OF IEEE VIRTUAL REALITY, 149-156.
7. CARROLL, J. B. 1974. PSYCHOMETRIC TESTS AS COGNITIVE TASKS: A NEW "STRUCTURE OF INTELLECT. " PRINCETON, N.J.: EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE, RESEARCH BULLETIN, 74-16.
8. CASEY, MB., BRABECK, M. 1989. EXCEPTIONS TO THE MALE ADVANTAGE ON A SPATIAL TASK: FAMILY HANDEDNESS AND COLLEGE MAJOR AS FACTORS IDENTIFYING WOMEN WHO EXCEL. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 27, 5, 689-696.
9. DARKEN, R. 2000. VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS AND THE ENHANCEMENT OF SPATIAL BEHAVIOR: A PROPOSED RESEARCH AGENDA.. HTTP://WWW.MOVESINSTITUTE.ORG/DARKEN/ PUBLICATIONS/ENHANCEMENTREVISE D.PDF.
10. DIX, A. FINLAY, J. ABOWD, G. BEALE, R. 1998. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION. PRENTICE HALL EUROPE: 2ED.
11. EKSTROM, R.B., FRENCH, J.W., HARMAN, H.H. 1976 MANUAL FOR KIT OF FACTOR REFERENCED COGNITIVE TESTS. EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE, PRINCETON, NJ.
12. FIGUEROA, P., GREEN, M., HOOVER, J. 2001. 3DML: A LANGUAGE FOR 3D INTERACTION TECHNIQUES SPECIFICATION. SHORT PRESENTATION AT EUROGRAPHICS 2001, MANCHESTER, UNITED KINGDOM.
13. HERNDON, K. P., VAN DAM, A., GLEICHER, M. 1994. WORKSHOP ON THE CHALLENGES OF 3D INTERACTION. SIGCHI BULLETIN, 26, 4, 1-9.
14. HODGES, L. ANDERSON, R. BURDEA, G. HOFFMAN, H. ROTHBAUM, B. 2001. TREATING PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PHYSICAL DISORDERS WITH VR. IEEE COMPUTER GRAPHICS AND APPLICATIONS, 25-33.
15. JACOBSON, J., REDFERN, M. S., FURMAN, J. M., WHINEY, L. W., SPARTO, P. J., WILSON, J. B., HODGES, L. F. 2001. BALANCE NAVE; A VIRTUAL REALITY FACILITY FOR RESEARCH AND REHABILITATION OF BALANCE DISORDERS, PROCEEDINGS OF VIRTUAL REALITY SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, NOVEMBER 15-17.
16. LARSON, P. RIZZO, A.A. BUCKWALTER, J.G. VAN ROOYEN, A. KRATZ, K. NEUMANN, U. KESSLEMAN, C. THIEBAUX, M. VAN DER ZAAO, C. 1999. GENDER ISSUES IN THE USE OF VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR, 2, 2.
17. MENARD, S. 1995. APPLIED LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS. THOUSAND OAKS, CA: SAGE PUBLICATIONS. SERIES: QUANTITATIVE APPLICATIONS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 81.
18. MINE, M., 1995. VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION TECHNIQUES. UNC CHAPEL HILL COMPUTER SCIENCE TECHNICAL REPORT TR95-018.
19. MYERS, B. BHATNAGAR, R. NICHOLS, J. PECK, C. KONG, D. MILLER, R. LONG, A. C. 2002. INTERACTION AT A DISTANCE; MEASURING THE PERFORMANCE OF LASER POINTERS AND OTHER DEVICES. CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS AND COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 33-40.
20. MYERS, B., HUDSON, S.E., PAUSCH, R., 2001. PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE OF USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE TOOLS. IN JOHN M. CARKOLL, ED. HCI IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM. NEW YORK: ACM PRESS, ADDISON-WESLEY, 213-233.
21. OLDFIELD, R.C. 1971. THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS: THE EDINBURGH INVENTORY. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 9, 97-113.
22. PASSIG, D. EDEN, S. 2001. VIRTUAL REALITY AS A TOOL FOR IMPROVING SPATIAL ROTATION AMONG DEAF AND HARD-OF-HEARING CHILDREN. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR, 4, 6, 681-686.
23. PETERS, M. 1995. REVISED VANDENBURG AND KUSE MENTAL ROTATIONS TESTS: FORMS MRT-A TO MRT-D. GUELPH (ON), CANADA: TECHNICAL REPORT, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH.
24. PIERCE, J., FORSBERG, A., CONWAY, M., HONG, S., ZELEZNIK, R., AND MINE, M. 1997. IMAGE PLANE INTERACTION TECHNIQUES IN 3D IMMERSIVE ENVIRONMENTS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM SYMPOSIUM ON INTERACTIVE 3D GRAPHICS, p. 39-44.
25. PIERCE, J., STEARNS, B., AND PAUSCH, R. 1999. VOODOO DOLLS: SEAMLESS INTERACTION AT MULTIPLE SCALES IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM SYMPOSIUM ON INTERACTIVE 3D GRAPHICS, 141-146.
26. PIERCE, J. 2001. EXPANDING THE INTERACTION LEXICON FOR 3D GRAPHICS. SCHOOL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY DISSERTATION.
27. POUPYREV, I., BILLINGHURST, M., WEGHORST, S., AND ICHIKAWA, T. 1996. THE GO-GO INTERACTION TECHNIQUE: NON-LINEAR MAPPING FOR DIRECT MANIPULATION IN VR. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM SYMPOSIUM ON USER INTERFACE SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY, P. 79-80.
28. POUPYREV, I., WEGHORST, S., BILLINGHURST, M., AND ICHIKAWA, T. 1997. A FRAMEWORK AND TESTBED FOR STUDYING MANIPULATION TECHNIQUES FOR IMMERSIVE VR. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ACM SYMPOSIUM ON VIRTUAL REALITY SOFTWARE AND TECHNOLOGY, 21-28.
29. RIZZO, A. BUCKWALTER, J.G. VAN DER ZAAG, C. 2000. VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT APPLICATIONS IN CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY. THE HANDBOOK OF VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, NEW YORK: L.A. ERLBAUM.
30. RIZZO, A. BUCKWALTER, J. G. MCGEE, J. BOWERLY, T. VAN DER ZAAG, C. NEUMANN, U. THIEBAUX, M. KIM, L. PAIR, J. CHUA, C. 2001. VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS FOR ASSESSING AND REHABILITATING COGNITIVE/FUNCIONAL PERFORMANCE A REVIEW OF PROJECTS AT THE USC INTEGRATED MEDIA SYSTEMS CENTER. PRESENCE, 10, 4, 359-374.
31. STOAKLEY, R., CONWAY, M..AND PAUSCH, R. 1995. VIRTUAL REALITY ON A WIM: INTERACTIVE WORLDS IN MINIATURE. PROCEEDINGS OF CHI, p. 265-272.
32. VOYER, D., VOYER, S., BRYDEN, M. P. 1995. MAGNITUDE OF SEX DIFFERENCES IN SPATIAL ABILITIES: A META-ANALYSIS AND CONSIDERATION OF CRITICAL VARIABLES, PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 117, 2, 250-270.
33. VAN DAM, A. 1997 THREE-DIMENSIONAL USER INTERFACES FOR IMMERSIVE VIRTUAL REALITY, BROWN UNIVERSITY COMPUTER GRAPHICS GROUP FINAL REPORT, RESEARCH GRANT NAG 2-830.
34. WARE, C., FLEET, D. 1997, CONTEXT SENSITIVE FLYING INTERFACE, SYMPOSIUM ON INTERACTIVE 3D GRAPHICS, 127-130.
35. WALLER, D. KNAPP, D. HUNT, E. 2001. SPATIAL REPRESENTATIONS OF VIRTUAL MAZES: THE ROLE OF VISUAL FIDELITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, HUMAN FACTORS, 43, 1, 147-158.
36. WINGRAVE, C. A., BOWMAN, D.A., RAMAKRISHNAN, N. 2001. A FIRST STEP TOWARDS NUANCE-ORIENTED INTERFACES FOR VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS. PROCEEDINGS OF THE VIRUTAL REALITY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 181-188.
37. WINGRAVE, C. 2001. NUANCE-ORIENTED INTERFACES IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS. VIRGINIA TECH THESIS.
38. WINGRAVE, C. BOWMAN, D. RAMAKRISHNAN, N. 2002. TOWARDS PREFERENCES IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT INTERFACES. EIGHTH EUROGRAPHICS WORKSHOP ON VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, 63-72.
39. BOWMAN, D., GABBARD, J., HIX, D. 2002 A SURVEY OF USABILITY EVALUATION IN VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS: CLASSIFICATION AND COMPARISON OF METHODS. PRESENCE, 11, 4, 404-424.