TractorBeam: Seamless integration of local and remote pointing for tabletop displays

Proceedings - Graphics Interface

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 33-40

  Parker, Karen ^a   Mandryk, Regan L ^b   Inkpen, Kori M ^a  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Input and interaction technologies; Pen based Uls; Quantitative empirical methods; Tabletop displays; User studies

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; REMOTE SENSING; USER INTERFACES;

INPUT AND INTERACTION TECHNIQUES; PEN-BASED UIS; QUANTITATIVE EMPIRICAL METHODS; TABLETOP DISPLAYS; USER STUDIES;

DISPLAY DEVICES;

EID: 32244441541     PISSN: 07135424     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Accot, J. and Zhai, S. (1997). Beyond Fitts' Law: Models for trajectory-based HCI tasks. In Proc. of CHI '97. p. 295-302.
2. Baudisch, P., Cutrell, E., Robbins, D., Czerwinski, M., Tandler, P., Bederson, B., Zierlinger, A. (2003). Drag-and-Pop and Drag-and-Pick: Techniques for accessing remote screen content on touch- and penoperated systems. In Proc. INTERACT 2003. p. 57-64.
3. Boritz, J. and Booth, K.S. (1998). A study of interactive 6 DOF docking in a computerised virtual environment. In Proc. of VRAIS '98. p. 1.39-146.
4. Cohen, O., Meyer, S., and Nilsen, E. (1993). Studying the movement of high tech rodentia: Pointing and dragging. In Ext. Abstracts of CHI '93. p. 135-136.
5. Deitz, P. and Leigh, D. (2000). DiamondTouch: A multi-user touch technology. In Proc. of VIST 2000. p. 219-226.
6. Graham, E.D. and MacKenzie, C.L. (1996). Physical versus virtual pointing. In Proc. CHI'96. p. 292-299.
7. Krueger, W. and Frohlich, B. (1994). The Responsive Workbench. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 14(3): p. 12-15.
8. MacKenzie, C.L., Graham, E.D., Trip, A., and Wang, Y. (1996). Pointing to virtual targets with the left and right hand. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18: p. S55.
9. MacKenzie, I.S. and Jusoh, S. (2001). An evaluation of two input devices for remote pointing. In Proc. of EHCI 2001: Springer-Verlag, p. 235-250.
10. Myers, B.A., Bhatnagar, R., Nichols, J., Peck, C.H., Kong, D., Miller, R., and Long, A.C. (2002). Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices. In Proc. of CHI 2002. p. 33-40.
11. Oh, J. and Stuerzlinger, W. (2002). Laser pointers as collaborative pointing devices. In Proc. of Graphics Interface 2002. p. 141-149.
12. Rekimoto, J. (2002). SmartSkin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. In Proc. of CHI 2002. p. 113-120.
13. Rekimoto, J. and Saitoh, M. (1999). Augmented Surfaces: A spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments. In Proc. CHI '99. p. 378-385.
14. Scott, S.D., Carpendale, M.S.T., and Inkpen, K.M. (2004). Territoriality in collaborative tabletop work-spaces. In Proc. of CSCW 2004.
15. Scott, S.D., Lesh, N., and Klau, G.W. (2002). Investigating human-computer optimization. In Proc. of CHI 2002. p. 155-162.
16. Ulmer, B. and Ishii, H. (1997). The metaDESK: Models and prototypes for tangible user interfaces. In Proc. of VIST'97. p. 223-232.
17. Welford, (1968). Fundamentals of Skill. London: Methuen.
18. Wellner, P. (1993). Interacting with paper on the Digital Desk. Comm. of the ACM, 36(7): p. 87-96.
19. Wu, M. and Balakrishnan, R. (2003). Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays. In Proceedings of VIST 2003. p. 193-202.