Fine-scale determinants of butterfly species richness and composition in a mountain region

Journal of Biogeography

Volumn 37, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1706-1720

  Illán, Javier Gutiérrez ^a   Gutiérrez, David ^a   Wilson, Robert J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD REY JUAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Elevational diversity gradient; Iberian Peninsula; Lepidoptera; Mediterranean; Mountains; Rarefaction; Species composition; Species richness energy; Variation partitioning

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BUTTERFLY; CLIMATE CHANGE; GIS; HABITAT CONSERVATION; LAND COVER; MOUNTAIN REGION; NICHE PARTITIONING; SPECIES RICHNESS; TOPOGRAPHY;

IBERIAN PENINSULA; SIERRA DE GUADARRAMA; SISTEMA CENTRAL; SPAIN;

LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 77955607609     PISSN: 03050270     EISSN: 13652699     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02314.x     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Agencia estatal de meteorología 2009, http://www.aemet.es/es, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino, Available at: (accessed 15 January 2009)
2. Algar AC, Kharouba HM, Young ER, Kerr JT. Predicting the future of species diversity: macroecological theory, climate change, and direct tests of alternative forecasting methods. Ecography 2009, 32:22-33.
3. Beck J, Kitching IJ. Drivers of moth species richness on tropical altitudinal gradients: a cross-regional comparison. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2009, 18:361-371.
4. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 1992, 73:1045-1055.
5. ter Braak CJF. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 1986, 67:1167-1179.
6. ter Braak CJF, Prentice IC. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research 1988, 18:271-317.
7. ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5) 2002, Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY
8. Brehm G, Süssenbach D, Fiedler K. Unique elevational diversity patterns of geometrid moths in an Andean montane rainforest. Ecography 2003, 26:456-466.
9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach 2002, 2nd edn, Springer Verlag, New York
10. Capas usos del suelo (1:50.000) de la Comunidad de Madrid. Plan Regional de la Estrategia Territorial de la Comunidad de Madrid 1998, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Madrid
11. Dennis RLH. Butterflies and climate change 1993, Manchester University Press, Manchester
12. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG. Butterfly wing morphology variation in the British Isles: the influence of climate, behavioural posture and the hostplant-habitat. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1989, 38:323-348.
13. ArcGIS 8.1 2001, Environmental System Research Institute Inc., Redlands, CA
14. Fernández-González F. La vegetación del valle del Paular I (Sierra de Guadarrama, Madrid). Lazoroa 1991, 12:153-272.
15. Field R, Hawkins BA, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Diniz-Filho JAF, Guégan JF, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O'Brien EM, Turner JRG. Spatial species-richness gradients across scales: a meta-analysis. Journal of Biogeography 2009, 36:132-147.
16. Fielding AH, Bell JF. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environmental Conservation 1997, 24:38-49.
17. Fleishman E, Austin GT, Weiss AD. An empirical test of Rapoport's rule: elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities. Ecology 1998, 79:2482-2493.
18. Fleishman E, Fay JP, Murphy DD. Upsides and downsides: contrasting topographic gradients in species richness and associated scenarios for climate change. Journal of Biogeography 2000, 27:1209-1219.
19. Fortin M-J, Dale MRT. Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
20. Fu P, Rich PM. The solar analyst 1.0. user manual 2000, http://www.hemisoft.com/, Helios Environmental Modelling Institute, LLC (HEMI), Lawrence, KS, Available at:
21. García-Barros E. Observaciones sobre la biología de Maniola jurtina (L., 1758) en el centro de la Península Ibérica: fenología general del ciclo biológico, duración del período de prepuesta y fecundidad potencial de las hembras. Boletín de la Asociación Española de Entomología 1987, 11:235-247.
22. Geary RC. The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping. The Incorporated Statistician 1954, 5:115-145.
23. Gotelli NJ, Colwell RK. Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters 2001, 4:379-391.
24. Gotelli NJ, Entsminger GL. EcoSim: null models software for ecology. Version 7.0 2001, http://homepages.together.net/wgentsmin/ecosim.htm, Acquired Intelligence Inc. & Kesey-Bear, Jericho, VT, Available at:
25. Guisan A, Thuiller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecology Letters 2005, 8:993-1009.
26. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 2000, 135:147-186.
27. Gutiérrez D. Butterfly richness patterns and gradients. Ecology of butterflies in Europe 2009, 250-280. Settele JShreeve TKonvicka Mvan Dyck H. ed. by, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
28. Gutiérrez D, Menéndez R. Regional hotspots of butterfly diversity in a protected area: are they indicators of unique assemblages and areas with more species of conservation concern? Acta Oecologica 2007, 32:301-311.
29. Gutiérrez Illán J, Gutiérrez D, Wilson RJ. The contributions of topoclimate and land cover to species distributions and abundance: fine resolution tests for a mountain butterfly fauna. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2010, 19:159-173.
30. Hawkins BA, Porter EE. Water-energy balance and the geographic pattern of species richness of western Palearctic butterflies. Ecological Entomology 2003, 28:678-686.
31. Hawkins BA, Field R, Cornell HV, Currie DJ, Guégan JF, Kaufman DM, Kerr JT, Mittelbach GG, Oberdorff T, O'Brien EM, Porter EE, Turner JRG. Energy, water, and broad-scale geographic patterns of species richness. Ecology 2003, 84:3105-3117.
32. Hortal J, Garcia-Pereira P, García-Barros E. Butterfly species richness in mainland Portugal: predictive models of geographic distribution patterns. Ecography 2004, 27:68-82.
33. Jetz W, Rahbek C. Geographic range size and determinants of avian species richness. Science 2002, 297:1548-1551.
34. Jiménez-Valverde A, Lobo JM. Determinants of local spider (Araneidae and Thomisidae) species richness on a regional scale: climate and altitude vs. habitat structure. Ecological Entomology 2007, 32:113-122.
35. Kaboli M, Guillaumet A, Prodon R. Avifaunal gradients in two arid zones of central Iran in relation to vegetation, climate, and topography. Journal of Biogeography 2006, 33:133-144.
36. Kerr JT. Butterfly species richness patterns in Canada: energy, heterogeneity, and the potential consequences of climate change. Conservation Ecology 2001, 5. http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art10/, [online] URL:
37. Kerr JT, Southwood TRE, Cihlar J. Remotely sensed habitat diversity predicts butterfly species richness and community similarity in Canada. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2001, 98:11365-11371.
38. Körner C. The use of "altitude" in ecological research. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2007, 22:569-574.
39. Kumar S, Simonson SE, Stohlgren TJ. Effects of spatial heterogeneity on butterfly species richness in Rocky Mountain National Park, CO, USA. Biodiversity and Conservation 2009, 18:739-763.
40. Legendre P, Legendre L. Numerical ecology 1998, Elsevier, Amsterdam
41. Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Pöyry J, Saarinen K. Determinants of biogeographical distribution of butterflies in boreal regions. Journal of Biogeography 2006, 33:1764-1778.
42. Mac Nally R, Fleishman E, Fay JP, Murphy DD. Modelling butterfly species richness using mesoscale environmental variables: model construction and validation for mountain ranges in the Great Basin of western North America. Biological Conservation 2003, 110:21-31.
43. Mac Nally R, Fleishman E, Bulluck LP, Betrus CJ. Comparative influence of spatial scale on beta diversity within regional assemblages of birds and butterflies. Journal of Biogeography 2004, 31:917-929.
44. Maestre FT, Escudero A, Bonet A. Introducción al análisis espacial de datos en ecología y ciencias ambientales 2008, Editorial Dykinson S.L., Madrid
45. S-PLUS (2000) Professional release 2 1999, Mathsoft Inc., Seattle, WA
46. McCabe DJ, Gotelli NJ. Effects of disturbance frequency, intensity, and area on assemblages of stream invertebrates. Oecologia 2000, 124:270-279.
47. McCain C. Elevational gradients in diversity of small mammals. Ecology 2005, 86:366-372.
48. McNeill J. The mountains of the Mediterranean world 1992, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
49. Menéndez R, González Megías A, Hill JK, Braschler B, Willis SG, Collingham Y, Fox R, Roy DB, Thomas CD. Species richness changes lag behind climate change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2006, 273:1465-1470.
50. Menéndez R, González-Megías A, Collingham Y, Fox R, Roy DB, Ohlemüller R, Thomas CD. Direct and indirect effects of climate and habitat factors on butterfly diversity. Ecology 2007, 88:605-611.
51. Merrill RM, Gutiérrez D, Lewis OT, Gutiérrez Illán J, Díez SB, Wilson RJ. Combined effects of climate and biotic interactions on the elevational range of a phytophagous insect. Journal of Animal Ecology 2008, 77:145-155.
52. "Mapa forestal de España" Provincia de Madrid. Escala 1:50000 2000, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, Madrid
53. "Mapa forestal de España" Provincia de Guadalajara. Escala 1:50000 2002a, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, Madrid
54. "Mapa forestal de España" Provincia de Ávila. Escala 1:50000 2002b, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, Madrid
55. "Mapa forestal de España" Provincia de Segovia. Escala 1:50000 2003, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Organismo Autónomo de Parques Nacionales, Madrid
56. Molina JM, Palma JM. Butterfly diversity and rarity within selected habitats of western Andalusia, Spain (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). Nota Lepidopterologica 1996, 78:267-280.
57. Murphy DD, Launer AE, Ehrlich PR. The role of adult feeding in egg production and population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha. Oecologia 1983, 56:257-263.
58. Shuttle radar topography mission 2004, http://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/srtm/, Available at: (accessed 15 October 2004)
59. Ninyerola M, Pons X, Roure JM. Objective air temperature mapping for the Iberian Peninsula using spatial interpolation and GIS. International Journal of Climatology 2007, 27:1231-1242.
60. Nogués-Bravo D, Araújo MB, Romdal T, Rahbek C. Scale effects and human impact on the elevational species richness gradients. Nature 2008, 453:216-220.
61. Olden J, Jackson DA. Torturing data for the sake of generality: how valid are our regression models? Écoscience 2000, 7:501-510.
62. Parmesan C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2006, 37:637-669.
63. Parmesan C, Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 2003, 421:37-42.
64. Parviainen M, Luoto M, Ryttäri T, Heikkinen RK. Modelling the occurrence of threatened plant species in taiga landscapes: methodological and ecological perspectives. Journal of Biogeography 2008, 35:1888-1905.
65. Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Liu C. Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography 2004, 27:285-298.
66. Pollard E, Yates TJ. Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation 1993, Chapman & Hall, London
67. R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2005, http://www.R-project.org, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, Available at:
68. Rahbek C. The elevation gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? Ecography 1995, 18:200-205.
69. Rahbek C. The role of spatial scale and the perception of large-scale species-richness patterns. Ecology Letters 2005, 8:224-239.
70. Rice WR. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 1989, 43:223-225.
71. Rivas-Martínez S, Fernández González F, Sanchez-Mata D. La vegetación de España. El Sistema Central 1987, Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, Madrid
72. Ruggiero A, Hawkins BA. Why do mountains support so many species of birds? Ecography 2008, 31:306-315.
73. Schofield JE, Edwards KJ, McMullen JA. Modern pollen-vegetation relationships in subarctic southern Greenland and the interpretation of fossil pollen data from the Norse landnám. Journal of Biogeography 2007, 34:473-488.
74. Schtickzelle N, Baguette M. Metapopulation viability analysis of the bog fritillary butterfly using RAMAS/GIS. Oikos 2004, 104:277-290.
75. "Mapa geológico y minero de Castilla y León". Escala 1:400000 2001, SIEMCALSA, Valladolid
76. Stefanescu C, Herrando S, Páramo F. Butterfly species richness in the north-west Mediterranean Basin: the role of natural and human-induced factors. Journal of Biogeography 2004, 31:905-915.
77. Storch D, Konvicka M, Benes J, Martinkova J, Gaston KJ. Distribution patterns in birds and butterflies of the Czech Republic: separating effects of habitat and geographic position. Journal of Biogeography 2003, 30:1195-1205.
78. Sutcliffe OL, Thomas CD, Yates TJ, Greatorex-Davies JN. Correlated extinctions, colonizations and population fluctuations in a highly connected ringlet butterfly metapopulation. Oecologia 1997, 109:235-241.
79. van Swaay CAM. The importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe. Biological Conservation 2002, 104:315-318.
80. van Swaay CAM, Warren MS. Prime butterfly areas in Europe: priority sites for conservation 2003, National Reference Centre for Agriculture, Nature and Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture, Wageningen
81. van Swaay CAM, Warren MS, Grégoire L. Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 2006, 10:189-209.
82. Thuiller W, Araújo MB, Lavorel S. Do we need land-cover data to predict species distributions in Europe? Journal of Biogeography 2004, 31:353-361.
83. Turner JRG, Gatehouse CM, Corey CA. Does solar energy control organic diversity? Butterflies, moths and the British climate. Oikos 1987, 48:195-205.
84. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS 1997, 2nd edn, Springer Verlag, New York
85. Viejo JL, Martín J, de Silva C. Patrones de distribución de las mariposas de Madrid (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea et Hesperioidea). Ecología 1988, 2:359-368.
86. Virkkala R, Luoto M, Heikkinen RK, Leikola N. Distribution patterns of boreal marshland birds: modelling the relationships to land cover and climate. Journal of Biogeography 2005, 32:1957-1970.
87. Warren MS, Hill JK, Thomas JA, Asher J, Fox R, Huntley B, Roy DB, Telfer MG, Jeffcoate S, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Willis SG, Greatorex-Davies JN, Moss D, Thomas CD. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 2001, 414:65-69.
88. Weiss SB, Murphy DD, White RR. Sun, slope and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha bayensis. Ecology 1988, 69:1486-1496.
89. White P, Kerr JT. Human impacts on environment-diversity relationships: evidence for biotic homogenization from butterfly species richness patterns. Global Ecology and Biogeography 2007, 16:290-299.
90. Wilson RJ, Gutiérrez D, Gutiérrez Illán J, Martínez D, Agudo R, Monserrat VJ. Changes to the elevational limits and extent of species ranges associated with climate change. Ecology Letters 2005, 8:1138-1146.
91. Wilson RJ, Gutiérrez D, Gutiérrez Illán J, Monserrat VJ. An elevational shift in butterfly species richness and composition accompanying recent climate change. Global Change Biology 2007, 13:1873-1887.