Erratum: The Female Knee: Anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design (Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0536-5);The female knee: Anatomic variations and the female-specific total knee design

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 466, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 3059-3065

  Merchant, Alan C ^a   Arendt, Elizabeth A ^b   Dye, Scott F ^c   Fredericson, Michael ^a   Grelsamer, Ronald P ^d   Leadbetter, Wayne B ^e   Post, William R ^f   Teitge, Robert A ^g  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

^f Mountaineer Orthopedic Specialists   (United States)

^g WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMICAL VARIATION; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; GENDER; HUMAN; IMPLANT; KNEE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; PATELLOFEMORAL JOINT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; HISTOLOGY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHESIS; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FITTING; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 58149306015     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0650-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. P Aglietti JN Insall G Cerulli 1983 I. Measurements of incongruence Clin Orthop Relat Res 176 217 224
2. Anonymous 2008 Gender-specific knee replacements: a technology overview J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16 63 67
3. PN Baker FM Khaw LM Kirk CN Esler PJ Gregg 2007 Randomized controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year survival analysis J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 1608 1614
4. W Barrett 2006 The need for gender-specific prostheses in TKA: does size make a difference? Orthopedics 29 suppl S53 S55
5. BC Bengs RD Scott 2006 The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 21 650 655
6. RE Booth Jr 2006 The gender-specific (female) knee Orthopedics 29 768 769
7. RB Bourne RW McCalden SJ MacDonald L Mokete J Guerin 2007 Influence of patient factors on TKA outcomes at 5 to 11 years follow-up Clin Orthop Relat Res 464 27 31
8. H Brattstrom 1964 Shape of the intercondylar groove normally and in recurrent dislocation of the patella; a clinical and x-ray anatomical investigation Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 68 1 148
9. J Brooks 2007 Gender-specific knees CMAJ 176 309 310
10. KR Chin DF Dalury D Zurakowski RD Scott 2002 Intra-operative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty J Knee Surg 15 213 217
11. S Conley A Rosenberg R Crowninshield 2007 The female knee: anatomic variations J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15 suppl 1 S31 S36
12. TK Fehring JA Murphy TD Hayes DW Roberts DL Pomeroy WL Griffin 2004 Factors influencing wear and osteolysis in press-fit condylar modular total knee replacements Clin Orthop Relat Res 428 40 50
13. DE Font-Rodriguez GR Scuderi JN Insall 1997 Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 345 79 86
14. GS Gill AB Joshi 2001 Long-term results of kinematic condylar knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 83 355 358
15. KA Greene 2007 Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty 22 27 31
16. RP Grelsamer A Dubey CH Weinstein 2005 Men and women have similar Q angles J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 1498 1501
17. JP Guerra MJ Arnold RL Gaidosik 1994 Q angle: effects of isometric quadriceps contraction and body position J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19 200 204
18. SF Harwin KA Greene K Hitt 2007 Early experience with a new total knee implant: maximizing range of motion and function with gender-specific sizing Surg Technol Int 16 199 205
19. AK Himanen E Belt J Nevalainen M Hämäläinen MU Lehto 2005 Survival of the AGC total knee arthroplasty is similar for arthrosis and rheumatoid arthritis: Finnish Arthroplasty Register report on 8, 467 operations carried out between 1985 and 1999 Acta Orthop 76 85 88
20. K Hitt JR Shurman II K Greene J McCarthy J Moskal T Hoeman MA Mont 2003 Anthropomorphic measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 suppl 4 115 122
21. MG Horton TL Hall 1989 Quadriceps femoris muscle angle: normal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures Phys Ther 69 897 901
22. RW Hsu S Himeno MB Coventry EY Chao 1990 Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load bearing distribution at the knee Clin Orthop Relat Res 255 215 227
23. RL Kane KJ Saleh TJ Wilt B Bershadsky 2005 The functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 1719 1724
24. FM Khaw LM Kirk RW Morris PJ Gregg 2002 A randomized, controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: ten-year survival analysis J Bone Joint Surg Br 84 658 666
25. J Kim CL Nelson PA Lotke 2004 Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 1479 1484
26. LA Livingston 1998 The quadriceps angle: a review of the literature J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28 105 109
27. JL Pierson MA Ritter EM Keating PM Faris JB Meding ME Berend KE Davis 2007 The effect of stuffing the patellofemoral compartment on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 2195 2203
28. PL Poilvache JN Insall GR Scuderi DE Font-Rodriguez 1996 Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 331 35 44
29. JA Rand DM Ilstrup 1991 Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: cumulative rates of survival of 9, 200 total knee arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Am 73 397 409
30. JA Rand RT Trousdale DM Ilstrup WS Harmsen 2003 Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 259 265
31. MA Ritter LD Harty KE Davis JB Meding ME Berend 2003 Predicting range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: clustering, log-linear regression, and regression tree analysis J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 1278 1285
32. VI Roberts CN Esler WM Harper 2007 A 15-year follow-up study of 4, 606 primary total knee replacements J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 1452 1456
33. O Robertsson M Dunbar T Pehrsson K Knutson L Lidgren 2000 Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27, 372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden Acta Orthop Scand 71 262 267
34. O Robertsson K Knutson S Lewold L Lidgren 2001 The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41, 223 knees operated on in 1988-1997 Acta Orthop Scand 72 503 513
35. GR Scuderi JN Insall RE Windsor 1989 Survivorship of cemented knee replacements J Bone Joint Surg Br 71 798 803
36. G Vazquez-Vela Johnson RL Worland J Keenan N Norambuena 2003 Patient demographics as a predictor of the ten-year survival rate in primary total knee replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 85 52 56
37. LA Whiteside 1991 The effect of patient age, gender, and tibial component fixation on pain relief after total knee arthroplasty Clin Orthop Relat Res 271 21 27
38. LH Woodland RS Francis 1992 Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions Am J Sports Med 20 208 211
39. RJ Wright CB Sledge R Poss FC Ewald ME Walsh EA Lingard 2004 Patient-reported outcome and survivorship after Kinemax total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 2464 2470
40. Zimmer Gender Solutions Knee. Available at: http://genderknee.com/micro/ ctl?op=global&action=1&id=9508&global=1&template=mn. Accessed July 25, 2007.