Analysis of the outcome in male and female patients using a unisex total knee replacement system

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 357-360

  Dalury, D F ^a,d   Mason, J B ^b   Murphy, J A ^c   Adams, M J ^a  

^a Research Co Ordinator Towson Orthopaedic Associates   (United States)

^b ORTHOCAROLINA HIP AND KNEE CENTER   (United States)

^c Synthes Technical Center   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PAIN; MALE; OSTEOLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADULT; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SEX FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 63049089081     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21771     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Csintalan RP, Schulz MM, Woo J, McMahon PJ, Lee TO. Gender differences in patellofemoral joint biomechanics. Clin Orthop 2002;402:260-9.
2. Hitt K, Shurman JR II, Greene K, et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human knee: correlation to the sizing of current knee arthroplasty systems. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:115-22.
3. Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996;331:35-46.
4. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS. Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2003;85-A:259-65.
5. Woodland LH, Francis RS. Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions. Am J Sports Med 1992;20:208-11.
6. Horton MG, Hall TL. Quadriceps femoris muscle angle: normal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures. Phys Ther 1989;69:897-901.
7. Conley S, Rosenberg A, Crowninshield R. The female knee: anatomic variations. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007;15:S31-6.
8. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:13-4.
9. Ewald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 1989;248:9-12.
10. Dalury DF, Barrett W P, Mason JB, et al. Midterm survival of a contemporary modular total knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1970 knees. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2008;90-B:1594-6.
11. Griffin WL, Fehring TK, Pomeroy DL, Gruen TA, Murphy JA. Sterilization and wear-related failure in first- and second-generation press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2007;464:16-20.
12. Dorey F, Amstutz HC. Survivorship analysis in the evaluation of joint replacement. J Arthroplasty 1986;1:63-9.
13. Chin KR, Dalury DF, Zurakowski D, Scott RD. Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2002;15:213-17.
14. Grelsamer R P, Dubey A, Weinstein CH. Men and women have similar Q angles: a clinical and trigonometric evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005;87-B:1498-501.
15. Vincent KR, Vincent HK, Lee LW, Alfano A P. Outcomes in total knee arthroplasty patients after inpatient rehabilitation: influence of age and gender. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006;85:482-9.
16. Rand JA, Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty: cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1991;73- A:397-409.
17. Kim J, Nelson CL, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:1479-84.
18. Nelson CL, Kim J, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87-A:264-70.
19. Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Windsor RE, Moran MC. Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1989;71-B:798-803.
20. Petterson SC, Raisis L, Bodenstab A, Snyder-Mackler L. Disease-specific gender differences among total knee arthroplasty candidates. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2007;89-A:2327-33.
21. Ayers DC, Franklin PD, Ploutz-Snyder R, Boisvert CB. Total knee replacement outcome and coexisting physical and emotional illness. Clin Orthop 2005;440:157-61.
22. Saleh KJ, Santos ER, Ghomrawi HM, Parvizi J, Mulhall KJ. Socioeconomic issues and demographics of total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop 2006;446:15-21.