The differential effects of two self-managed math instruction procedures: cover, copy, and compare versus copy, cover, and compare

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 153-165

  Grafman, Joel M ^a   Cates, Gary L ^b  

^a Illinois State University ^*  (United States)

^b ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955591769     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20459     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Belfiore, P. J., Skinner, C. H., & Ferkis, M. A. (1995). Effects of response repetition in sight-word training for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 347-348.
2. Berliner, D. C. (1984). The half-full glass: A review of research on teaching. In P. L. Hosford (Ed.), Using what we know about teaching (pp. 51-85). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Bolich, B., Kavon, N., McLaughlin, T. F., Williams, R. L., & Urlacher, S. (1995). The effects of a copy, cover, compare procedure and a token economy on the retention of basic multiplication facts by two middle school students with ADD and ADHD. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 19, 1-10.
4. Cates, G. L. (2005). Effects of peer versus computer assisted drill on mathematics response rates. Psychology in the Schools, 42(6), 637-646.
5. Cates, G. L., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Getting remedial mathematics students to choose homework with 20% and 40% more problems: An investigation of the strength of the interspersing procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 339-347.
6. Cates, G. L., Skinner, C. H.,Watson, T.W.,Meadows, T. J.,Weaver, A., & Jackson, B. (2003). Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review, 32, 601-616.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).Hillsdale,NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Hall. R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. L. Heward, T. E., Herron, J. Trap-Porter, & D. S. Hill (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
9. Hansen, C. L. (1978). Writing skills. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 93-126). London: Merrill.
10. Haring, N. G., & Eaton, M. D. (1978). Systematic instructional procedures: An instructional hierarchy. In N. G. Haring, T. C. Lovitt, M. D. Eaton, & C. L. Hansen (Eds.), The fourth R: Research in the classroom (pp. 23-40). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
11. Isaacs, A. C., & Carroll, W. M. (1999). Strategies for basic-facts instruction. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 508-515.
12. Johns, G. A, Skinner, C. H, & Nail, G. L. (2000). Effects of interspersing briefer mathematics problems on assignment choice in students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10, 95-106.
13. Joseph, L. M., & Nist, L. M. (2006). Comparing the effects of unknown-known ratios on word reading learning versus learning rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 69-79.
14. Lee, M. J., & Tingstrom, D. H. (1994). A group math intervention: The modification of cover, copy, and compare for group application. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 133-145.
15. McAuley, S. M., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1992). Comparison of add-a-word and computer spell programs with low-achieving students. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 362-369.
16. McCurdy, M., Skinner, C. H., Grantham, K., Watson, T. S., & Hindman, P. M. (2001). Increasing on-task behavior in an elementary student during mathematics seatwork by interspersing additional brief problems. School Psychology Review, 30, 23-32.
17. McLaughlin, T. F., & Skinner, C. H. (1996). Improving academic performance through self-management: Cover, copy, and compare. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32, 113-118.
18. Miller, A. D., & Heward, W. L. (1992). Do your students really know their math facts?: Using daily time trials to build fluency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 28, 98-104.
19. Miller, S. P., & Mercer, C. D. (1997). Teaching math computation and problem solving: A program that works. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32, 185-189.
20. Murphy, J. F., Hern, C. L., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1990). The effects of the copy, cover, compare approach in increasing spelling accuracy with learning disabled students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 378-386.
21. Nist, L.,&Joseph, L. M. (2008). Effectiveness and efficiency of variations of flash card drills onword recognitionmaintenance and generalization. School Psychology Review, 37, 294-308.
22. Ozaki, C., Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1996). Effects of a copy/cover/compare drill and practice procedure for multiplication facts mastery with a sixth grade student with learning disabilities. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 20, 65-74.
23. Pellegrino, J. W., & Goldman, S. R. (1987). Information processing and elementary mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 23-32, 57.
24. Phillips, N. B., Hamlett, C. L, Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1993). Combining classwide curriculum-based measurement and peer tutoring to help general educators provide adaptive education. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 148-156.
25. Pratt-Struthers, J., Bartalamay, H. R.,Williams, R. L.,&McLaughlin, T. F. (1989). Effects of the add-a-word spelling program on spelling accuracy during creative writing: A replication across two classrooms. B. C. Journal of Special Education, 13, 151-158.
26. Pratt-Struthers, J., Struthers, T., & Williams, R. L. (1983). The effects of the add-a-word spelling program on spelling accuracy during creative writing. Education and Treatment of Children, 6, 277-283.
27. Rhymer, K. N., Skinner, C. H., Jackson, S., McNeill, S., Smith, T., & Jackson, B. (2002). The 1-minute explicit timing intervention: The influence of mathematics problem difficulty. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 29, 305-311.
28. Seigler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), Origins of cognitive skills (pp. 229-293). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Shapiro, E. S. (2004). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
30. Skinner, C. H. (1998). Preventing academic skills deficits. In T. S. Waton & F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy (pp. 66-82). New York: Plenum.
31. Skinner, C. H. (2002). An empirical analysis of interspersal research evidence, implications and applications of the discrete task completion hypothesis. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 347-368.
32. Skinner, C. H. (2008). Theoretical and applied implications of precisely measuring learning rates. School Psychology Review, 37, 309-315.
33. Skinner, C. H., Bamberg, H. W., Smith, E. S., & Powell, S. S. (1993). Cognitive cover, copy, and compare: Subvocal responding to increase rates of accurate division responding. Rase: Remedial and Special Education, 14, 49-56.
34. Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., & Pierce, N. (1992). Cover, copy, and compare: Increasing geography accuracy in students with behavior disorders. School Psychology Review, 21, 73-81.
35. Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Henington, C. (1996). Increasing learning trial rates by increasing student response rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313-325.
36. Skinner, C. H., Ford, J. M.,&Yunker, B.D. (1991).A comparison of instructional response requirements on the multiplication performance of behaviorally disordered students. Behavioral Disorders, 17, 56-65.
37. Skinner, C. H., McLaughlin, T. F., & Logan, P. (1997). Cover, copy, and compare: A self-managed academic intervention effective across skills, students, and settings. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 295-306.
38. Skinner, C. H., Shapiro, E. S., Turco, T. L., Cole, C. L., & Brown, D. K. (1992). A comparison of self- and peer-delivered immediate corrective feedback on multiplication performance. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 101-116.
39. Skinner, C. H., & Smith, E. S. (1992). Issues surrounding the use of self-management interventions for increasing academic performance. School Psychology Review, 21, 202-210.
40. Skinner, C. H., Turco, T. L., Beatty, K. L., & Rasavage, C. (1989). Cover, copy, and compare: A method for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18, 412-420.
41. Smith, T. J., Dittmer, K. I., & Skinner, C. H. (2002). Enhancing science performance in students with learning disabilities using cover, copy, and compare: A student shows the way. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 417-426.
42. Stading, M.,Williams, R. L., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1996). Effects of a copy, cover, and compare procedure on multiplication facts mastery with a third grade girl with learning disabilities in a home setting. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 425-434.
43. Wright, J. (2001). Interventioncentral.org. Retrieved July 15, 2003, from http://www.interventioncentral.org