Effects of interspersing briefer mathematics problems on assignment choice in students with learning disabilities

Journal of Behavioral Education

Volumn 10, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 95-106

  Johns, Gregg A ^a   Skinner, Christopher H ^b   Nail, Gregory L ^a  

^a Mississippi State Hospital   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Changeover delay; Concurrent schedules of reinforcement; Interspersal; Matching law

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043108040     PISSN: 10530819     EISSN: 15733513     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1016632012550     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Albers, A. E., & Greer, R. D. (1991). Is the three term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 337-354
2. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for behavior change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231-242.
4. Berliner, D. C. (1984). The half-full glass: A review of research on teaching. In P. L. Hosford (Ed.), Using what we know about teat" (pp. 51-85). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. Cates, G. L., Skinner, C. H., Watkins, C. E., Rhymer, K. N., McNeill, B. S., & McCurdy, M. (in press). Effects of interspersing math problems on student performance and perception of math assignments: Getting students to prefer to do more. Journal of Behavioral Education.
6. Cooke, N. L., Guzaukas, R., Pressley, J. S., & Kerr, K. (1993). Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children, 16, 213-234.
7. Dunlap, G., & Kern, L. (1996). Modifying instructional activities to promote desirable behavior: A conceptual and practical framework. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 297-312.
8. Foxx, R M., & Jones, J. R. (1978). A remediation program for increasing the spelling achievement of elementary and junior high school students. Behavior Modification, 2, 211-230.
9. Gettinger, M. (1995). Best practices for increasing academic learning time: In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 943-954). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
10. Greenwood, C. R., Dinwiddie, G., Terry, B., Wade, L., Stanley, S. O., Thibadeau, S., & Delquardi, J. C. (1987). Teacher- versus peer-mediated instruction: An eco-behavioral analysis of achievement outcomes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 521-538.
11. Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267-272.
12. Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243-266.
13. Horner, R. H., & Day, M. H. (1991). The effects of response efficiency on functionally equivalent competing behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 719-732.
14. Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company.
15. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Kulak, A. G. (1993). Parallels between math and reading disabilities: Common issues and approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 666-673.
17. Logan, P., & Skinner, C. H. (1998). Improving students' perceptions of a mathematics assignment by increasing problem completion rates: Is problem completion a reinforcing event? School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 322-331.
18. Lovitt, T.C., & Hansen, C.L. (1976). The use of contingent skipping and drilling to improve oral reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 20-22.
19. Mace, F. C., McCurdy, B., & Quigley, E. A. (1990). A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 197-205.
20. Mace, F. C., Neef, N. A., Shade, D., & Mauro, B. C. (1996). Effects of problem difficulty and reinforcer quality of time allocated to concurrent arithmetic problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 11-24.
21. Marascuilo, L. A., & McSweeney, M. (1967). Nonparametric post hoc comparisons for trend. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 401-412.
22. Martens, B. K., & Houk, J. L. (1989). The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 17-27.
23. Martens, B. K., Lochner, D. G., & Kelly, S. Q. (1992). The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: A demonstration of matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 143-151.
24. Michael, J. (1974). Statistical inference for individual organism research: Mixed blessing or curse. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 647-653.
25. Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1984). Practical implication of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 367-380.
26. Neef, N. A., Mace, F. C., & Shade, D. (1993). Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: The interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. Journal of Allied Behavior Analysis, 26, 37-52.
27. Neef, N. A., Mace, F. C., Shea, N. C., & Shade, D. (1992). Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extension of matching theory to educational settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 691-699.
28. Neef, N. A., Shade, D., & Miller, M. S. (1994). Assessing the influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 575-583.
29. Reschly, D. J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1995). School psychology paradigm shift. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 17-31). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
30. Reynolds, M. C., & Larkin, K. C. (1987). Noncategorical special education for mildly handicapped students: A system for the future. In M. C. Wang, M. C. Reynolds, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), The handbook of special education: Research and practice (Vol. 1, pp. 331-356). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
31. Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
32. Skinner, C. H. (1998). Preventing academic skills deficits. In T. S. Watson & F. M. Gresham (Eds.), Handbook of child behavior therapy (pp. 61-82). New York: Plenum Press.
33. Skinner, C. H., Belfiore, P. J., Mace, H. W., Williams-Wilson, S., & Johns, G. A. (1997). Altering response topography to increase learning rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 54-64.
34. Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., Wildmon, M., & Belfiore, P. J. (1996). Improving assignment preference through interspersing additional problems: Brief versus easy problems. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6, 427-437.
35. Skinner, C. H., Robinson, S. L., Johns, G. A., Logan, P., & Belfiore, P. J. (1996). Interspersing time-efficient, easy academic tasks to influence students' choice to complete more difficult tasks: More is less. Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 5-17.
36. Skinner, C. H., Turco, T. L., Beatty, K. L., & Rasavage, C. (1989). Cover, copy, and compare: An intervention for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review, 18, 212-220.