Sensory profile and acceptance of milk chocolate beverage;Perfil sensorial e aceitação de bebida láctea achocolatada

Ciencia e Tecnologia de Alimentos

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 391-398

  Pflanzer, Sérgio Bertelli ^a   da Cruz, Adriano Gomes ^a   Hatanaka, Camila Lie ^a   Mamede, Priscila Lourezon ^a   Cadena, Rafael ^a   Faria, José Assis Fonseca ^a   da Silva, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Pereira ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Chocolate milk beverage; Descriptive quantitative analysis; Sensory analysis; Sweetness

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955530087     PISSN: 01012061     EISSN: 1678457X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612010000200016     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ALMEIDA, K. E.; BONASSI, I. A.; ROÇA, R. O. Características físicas e químicas de bebidas lácteas fermentadas e preparadas com soro de queijo minas frescal. Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, v. 21, n. 2, p. 187-192, 2001.
2. BRASIL. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa n° 16, de 23 de agosto de 2005. Regulamento de Identidade e Qualidade de Bebidas Lácteas. Disponível em . Acesso em: jun. 2006.
3. CASTRO, F. P. et al. Effect of oligofructose incorporation on the properties of fermented probiotic lactic beverages. International Journal of Dairy Technology, v. 62, n. 1, p. 68-74, 2009.
4. COKER, C. J. et al. Towards the classification of cheese variety and maturity on the basis of statistical analysis of proteolysis data - a review. International Dairy Journal, v. 15, n. 2, p. 631-643, 2005.
5. CRUZ, A. G. et al. Milk Drink Using Whey Butter Cheese (queijo manteiga) and Acerola Juice as a Potential Source of Vitamin C. Food and Bioprocess Technology, v. 2, n. 4, p. 368-373, 2009.
6. DAMASIO, M. H.; COSTELL, E. Análisis sensorial descriptivo: generación de descriptores y selección de catadores. Revista Agroquímica de Tecnología de Alimentos, v. 31, n. 2, p. 165-78, 1991.
7. HOUGH, G. et al. Sensory optimization of a powdered chocolate milk formula. Food Quality and Preference, v. 8, n. 3, p. 213-221, 1997.
8. KEMP, S. E. Application of sensory evaluation in food research. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, v. 43, n. 9, p. 1507-1511, 2008.
9. KOFFI, E.; SHEWFELT, R.; WICKER, L. Storage stability and sensory analysis of UHT-processed whey-banana beverages. Journal of Food Quality, v. 28, n. 4, p. 386-401, 2005.
10. KOZAC, M.; SCAMAN, C. H. Unsupervised classification methods in food science: discussion and outlook. Journal of the Food Science and Agriculture, v. 88, n. 7, p. 1115-1117, 2008.
11. LIMA, S. M. C. G.; MADUREIRA, F. C. P.; PENNA, A. L. B. Bebidas lácteas - nutritivas e refrescantes. Milkbizz Tecnologia Temático, v. 1, n. 3, p. 4-11, 2002.
12. MAZZUCCHELLI, R.; GUINARD, J. X. Comparison of monadic and simultaneous sample presentations mode in a Descriptive analysis of milk chocolate. Journal of Sensory Studies, v. 14, n. 3, p. 245-248, 1999.
13. MEHINAGIC, E. et al. Relationship between sensory analysis, penetrometry and visible NR spectroscopy of apples belonging to different cultivars. Food Quality and Preference, v. 14, n. 5, p. 473-484, 2003.
14. MEILGAARD, M.; CIVILLE, G. V.; CARR, B. T. Sensory evaluantion tecniques. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1987.
15. MOSKOWITZ, H. R. Product testing and sensory evaluation of foods: marketing and R & D approacher. Westport: Food and Nutrition Press, 1983. 605 p.
16. MURRAY, J. M.; DELAHUNTY, C. M.; BAXTER, I. A. Descriptive sensorial analysis: past, present and future. Food Research International, v. 34, n. 2, p. 461-471, 2001.
17. PIFARRE, A. M. et al. Acceptability and nutritional quality of a beverage based on orange juice and whey powder, preserved by heat or high-intensity pulsed electric fields (HIPEF). Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion, v. 56, n. 4, p. 356-360, 2006.
18. RITJENS, S. Tendências mercadológicas dos iogurtes e bebidas lácteas. In: Leites fermentados e bebidas lácteas: Tecnologia e mercado. ITAL: Tecnolat, 1997.
19. SAS. User's procedures guide. Version 6. Cary: SAS Institute, Inc 1989. 2v.
20. SIMPSON, S. J.; PIGGOTT, J. R.; WILLIAMS, S. A. R. Sensorial Analysis. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, v. 33, n. 1, p. 7-18, 1998.
21. SIVIERI, K.; OLIVEIRA, M. N. Shelf-life evaluation of latic beverages added with fat with mimetics (Litesse and Dairy-Lo). Ciência e Tecnologia de Alimentos, v. 22, n. 1, p. 24-31, 2002.
22. STONE, H.; SIDEL, J. L. Descriptive analysis. In: STONE, H.; SIDEL, J. L. Sensory Evaluation Practices. London: Academic Press, 1985. p. 202-226.
23. THOMPSON, J. L. et al. Preference mapping of commercial chocolates milks. Journal of Food Science, v. 69, n. 9, p. S406-S413, 2004.
24. TRANJAN, B. C. et al. Development of Whey Goat Beverages. International Journal of Dairy Technology, v. 62, n. 3, p. 438-443, 2009.
25. YANES, M.; DURÁN, L.; COSTELL, E. Rheological and optical properties of commercial chocolate milk beverages. Journal of Food Engineering, v. 51, n. 2, p. 229-234, 2002.
26. ZOELLNER, S. S. et al. Whey beverage containg açaí pulp as food Carrier for probiotic bactéria. Australian Journal of Dairy Technology, v. 64, n. 2, p. 165-169, 2009.