Precise models deserve precise measures: A methodological dissection

Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 272-284

  Hilbig, Benjamin E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Adherence rate; Methodology; Multinomial processing tree model; Recognition heuristic; Signal detection theory; Simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955493586     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19302975     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
2. Bröder, A. (in press). The quest for Take The Best: Insights and outlooks from experimental research. In P. Todd, G. Gigerenzer, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Ecological rationality: Intelligence in the world. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bröder, A., & Eichler, A. (2006). The use of recognition information and additional cues in inferences from memory. Acta Psychologica, 121, 275-284.
4. Bröder, A., & Newell, B. R. (2008). Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 205-214.
5. Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003). Bayesian strategy assessment in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 193-213.
6. Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2006). Adaptive flexibility and maladaptive routines in selecting fast and frugal decision strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 904-918.
7. Erdfelder, E., Auer, T.-S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models: A review of the literature. Zeitschrift für Psychologie - Journal of Psychology, 217, 108-124.
8. Erdfelder, E., Küpper-Tetzel, C. E., & Mattern, S. (2010). Threshold models of recognition and the recognition heuristic. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky. Psychological Review, 103, 592-596.
10. Gigerenzer, G. (2009). Surrogates for theory. APS Observer, 22, 21-23.
11. Gigerenzer, G., Krauss, S., & Vitouch, O. (2004). The Null Ritual: What you always wanted to know about significance testing but were afraid to ask. In D. Kaplan (Eds.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 391-408). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
12. Glöckner, A. (2009). Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 186-199.
13. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 1055-1075.
14. Glöckner, A., & Bröder, A. (in press). Processing of recognition information and additional cues: A modelbased analysis of choice, confidence, and response time. Judgment and Decision Making
15. Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (1999). The recognition heuristic: How ignorance makes us smart. In G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, & The ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 37- 58). New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Goldstein, D. G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review, 109, 75-90.
17. Hilbig, B. E. (2008a). Individual differences in fast-andfrugal decision making: Neuroticism and the recognition heuristic. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1641-1645.
18. Hilbig, B. E. (2008b). One-reason decision making in risky choice? A closer look at the priority heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 457-462.
19. Hilbig, B. E. (in press). Reconsidering "evidence" for fast and frugal heuristics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
20. Hilbig, B. E., Scholl, S., & Pohl, R. F. (2010). Think or blink - is the recognition heuristic an "intuitive" strategy? Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 300-309.
21. Hilbig, B. E., Erdfelder, E., & Pohl, R. F. (2010). One-reason decision-making unveiled: A measurement model of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 36, 123-134.
22. Hilbig, B. E., & Pohl, R. F. (2008). Recognizing users of the recognition heuristic. Experimental Psychology, 55, 394-401.
23. Hilbig, B. E., & Pohl, R. F. (2009). Ignorance- versus evidence-based decision making: A decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1296-1305.
24. Hilbig, B. E., Pohl, R. F., & Bröder, A. (2009). Criterion knowledge: A moderator of using the recognition heuristic? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 510-522.
25. Hilbig, B. E., & Richter, T. (in press). Homo heuristicus outnumbered: Comment on Gigerenzer and Brighton (2009). Topics in Cognitive Science.
26. Jekel, M., Nicklisch, A., & Glöckner, A. (2010). Implementation of the Multiple-Measure Maximum Likelihood strategy classification method in R: addendum to Glöckner (2009) and practical guide for application. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 54-63.
27. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user's guide (2nd ed.). NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
28. Marewski, J.N., Gaissmaier, W., Schooler, L.J., Goldstein, D.G., & Gigerenzer, G. (2010). From recognition to decisions: Extending and testing recognitionbased models for multi-alternative inference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 287-309.
29. Moshagen, M. (2010). MultiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42-54.
30. Myung, I. J. (2000). The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 190-204.
31. Newell, B. R., & Fernandez, D. (2006). On the binary quality of recognition and the inconsequentially of further knowledge: Two critical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 333-346.
32. Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2004). On the role of recognition in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 923-935.
33. Oppenheimer, D. M. (2003). Not so fast! (and not so frugal!): Rethinking the recognition heuristic. Cognition, 90, B1-B9.
34. Pachur, T., Bröder, A., & Marewski, J. (2008). The recognition heuristic in memory-based inference: Is recognition a non-compensatory cue? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21, 183-210.
35. Pachur, T., & Hertwig, R. (2006). On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: Retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 983- 1002.
36. Pachur, T., Mata, R., & Schooler, L. J. (2009). Cognitive aging and the adaptive use of recognition in decision making. Psychology & Aging, 24, 901-915.
37. Pohl, R. F. (2006). Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 251-271.
38. Richter, T., & Späth, P. (2006). Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 150-162.
39. Rieskamp, J. (2008). The probabilistic nature of preferential choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1446-1465.
40. Schooler, L. J., & Hertwig, R. (2005). How forgetting aids heuristic inference. Psychological Review, 112, 610-628.