Erratum to: Automated scoring and feedback systems: Where are we and where are we heading?(27, 3, (291-300), 10.1177/0265532210364643);Automated scoring and feedback systems: Where are we and where are we heading?

Language Testing

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 291-300

  Xi, Xiaoming ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955376971     PISSN: 02655322     EISSN: 14770946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/02655322100270041102     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Bachman LF (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bachman LF, Palmer AS (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Bachman LF, Cohen A (eds) (1998). Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bernstein J., Van Moere A., and Cheng J. (2010). Validating automated speaking tests. Language Testing, 27(3): 355-377.
5. Carr N., Xi X. (in press). Automated scoring of short answer reading items: Implications for constructs. Language Assessment Quarterly.
6. Chalhoub-Deville M., Deville C. (2006). Old, borrowed, and new thoughts in second language testing. In R. Brennan (ed), Educational measurement, (4th ed., pp. 517-530). Westport, CT: Praeger.
7. Chapelle CA (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms? Language Learning and Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
8. Chapelle CA (2008). Utilizing technology in language assessment. In E. Shohamy (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language education, vol. 7: Language testing and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 123-134). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
9. Chapelle CA, Enright MK, and Jamieson JM (eds) (2008). Building a validity argument for the test of English as a foreign language™. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Chapelle CA, Douglas D. (2006). Assessing language through computer technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Chapelle CA and Chung Y-R. (2010). The Promise of NLP and speech processing technologies in language assessment. Language Testing, 27(3): 301-315.
12. Chen CE, Cheng W. (2008). Beyond the design of automated writing evaluation: Pedagogical practices and perceived learning effectiveness in EFL writing classes. Language Learning and Technology, 12(2), 94-112.
13. Clauser BE, Kane MT, and Swanson DB (2002). Validity issues for performance-based tests scored with computer-automated scoring systems. Applied Measurement in Education, 15, 413-432.
14. Cucchiarini C., Strik H., and Boves L. (2000). Quantitative assessment of second language learners' fluency by means of automatic speech recognition technology. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 989-999.
15. Cucchiarini C., Strik H., and Boves L. (2002). Quantitative assessment of second language learners' fluency: Comparisons between read and spontaneous speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111(6), 2862-2873.
16. Dodigovic M. (2005). Artificial intelligence in second language learning: Raising error awareness. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
17. Ericsson PF, Haswell R (eds) (2006). Machine scoring of student essays: Truth and consequences. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
18. Fox J., Fraser W. (2009). The Versant SpanishTM Test. Test review. Language Testing, 26(2), 313-322.
19. Gamon M., Leacock C., Brockett C.,et al.(forthcoming). Using statistical techniques and Web search to correct ESL errors. To appear in: CALICO Journal, special edition on 'Automatic Analysis of Lerner's Language'.
20. Han N-R Chodorow M., and Leacock C. (2006). Detecting errors in English article usage by non-native speakers. Natural Language Engineering, 12(2), 115-129.
21. Heift T., Schulze M. (2007). Errors and intelligence in computer-assisted language learning: Parsers and pedagogues. London and New York: Routledge.
22. Holland M, Fisher P (eds) (2008). The path of speech technologies in computer assisted language learning: From research toward practice. London and New York: Routledge.
23. Kane MT (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527-535.
24. Kane MT (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (ed), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 18-64). Washington, DC: American Council on Education/Praeger.
25. Pearson (2009). Versant Spanish Test: Test description and validation summary. Pearson Knowledge Technologies, Palo Alto, California. Available online at https://www.ordinate.com/technology/VersantSpanishTestValidation.pdf (accessed January 2010).
26. Randall PD, Haggstrom MA (eds) (2006). Changing language education through CALL. London and New York: Routledge.
27. Shermis MD, Burstein J (eds) (2003). Automated essay scoring: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Tetreault J., Chodorow M. (2008). The ups and downs of preposition error detection. Manchester, UK: COLING.
29. Warden CA (2000). EFL business writing behavior in differing feedback environments. Language Learning, 50(4), 573-616.
30. Weigle SC (2010). Validation of automated scoring of TOEFL iBT tasks against non-test indicators of writing Language Testing, 27(3): 335-353.
31. Xi X. (2008). What and how much evidence do we need? Critical considerations for using automated speech scoring systems. In Chapelle CA, Chung Y-R, and Xu J (eds), Towards adaptive CALL: Natural language processing for diagnostic language assessment (pp. 102-114). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
32. Xi X., Higgins D., Zechner K., and Williamson DM (2008). Automated scoring of spontaneous speech using SpeechRater v1.0 (ETS Research Rep. No. RR-08-62). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
33. Yao YC, Warden CA (1996). Process writing and computer correction: Happy wedding or shotgun marriage. CALL Electronic Journal. Available athttp://www.tell.is.ritsumei.ac.jp/callej/1-1/Warden1.html.