IDEA: Identifying Design Principles in Educational Applets

Educational Technology Research and Development

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 99-112

  Underwood, Jody S ^a   Hoadley, Christopher ^b   Lee, Hollylynne Stohl ^c   Hollebrands, Karen ^c   Digiano, Chris ^d   Renninger, K Ann ^e  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^e SWARTHMORE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18944386475     PISSN: 10421629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02504868     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Alexander, C. Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M. Jacobson, M. Fiksdahl-King, I., & Angel, S. (1977). A pattern language: Towns, buildings, construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Box, G. E. P. (1979). Robustness in scientific model building. In R. L. Launer & G. N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Robustness in statistics (pp. 201-236). NY: Academic Press.
3. Card, S. K., Newell, A., & Moran, T. P. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (1992). Getting around the task-artifact cycle: How to make claims and design by scenario. Transactions on Information Systems, 10(2), 181-212
5. Clements, D. H. (2000). From exercises and tasks to problems and projects: Unique contributions of computers to innovative mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 19, 9-47.
6. Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N, & Belanger, M. (1987). Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In: C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp 109-122). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd. ed., pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
8. Hollebrands, K. F. & Stohl, H. (2004). The interplay between technology design and students' control of problem solving. In D. McDougall (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education - North American Chapter (vol. 3, 1481-1487). Toronto.
9. Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), A handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515-556). NY: MacMillan.
10. Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In D. Centner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 348). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Norman, D. A. (1992). Design principles for cognitive artifacts. Research in Engineering Design, 4(1), 43-50.
13. Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
14. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). What is instructional-design theory and how is it changing? In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 5-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Renninger, K. A., Sinclair, N., Hand, V. M., Alejandre, S., Stohl, H., & Underwood, J. S. (2003). Interest and motivation for learning mathematics with online interactive challenge problems. Paper presented as part of the symposium, Interest and Motivation for Computer-Based Learning, European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Padova, Italy.
16. Roschelle, J., DiGiano, C., Koutlis, M., Repenning, A., Jackiw, N., & Suthers, D. (1999). Developing educational software components. JEEE Computer, 32(9), 50-58.
17. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic Press.
18. Schön, D. A. (1992). Designing as Reflective Conversation with the Materials of a Design Situation. Research in Engineering Design, 3(3), 131-148.
19. Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Sinclaire, M. P. (2003). Some implications of the results of a case study for the design of pre-constructed, dynamic geometry sketches and accompanying materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics 52(3), 289-317.
21. Snelbecker, G. E. (1999). Some thoughts about theories, perfection, and instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. II, pp. 31-47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Stohl, H. (2003). Preparing to teach mathematics with technology: Research implications for a learning trajectory. Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2003(1), 2961-2968.
23. Stohl, H. (in press). Facilitating students' problem solving: Prospective teachers' learning trajectory in a technological context. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.