Procedures for evaluating and prioritising the removal of fish passage barriers: A synthesis

Fisheries Management and Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 297-322

  Kemp, P S ^a   O'Hanley, J R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barrier removal; Culverts; Dams; Fish passage; Optimisation; Stream barriers

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CULVERT; DAM; DECISION MAKING; FISHPASS STRUCTURE; HABITAT RESTORATION; MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR; OPTIMIZATION; SALMONID; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

SALMONIDAE;

EID: 77955151130     PISSN: 0969997X     EISSN: 13652400     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2010.00751.x     Document Type: Review

References (96)

1. Aarestrup K, Lucas MC, Hansen JA. Efficiency of a nature-like bypass channel for sea trout (Salmo trutta) ascending a small Danish stream studied by PIT telemetry. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2003, 12:160-168.
2. Andelman SJ, Fagan WF. Umbrella and flagships: efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 2000, 94:5954-5959.
3. Armstrong JD, Kemp PS, Kennedy GJA, Ladle M, Milner NJ. Habitat requirements of Atlantic salmon and brown trout in rivers and streams. Fisheries Research 2003, 62:143-170.
4. Bowen MD, Marques S, Silva LGM, Vono V, Godinho HP. Comparing on site human and video counts at Igarapava fish ladder, south eastern Brazil. Neotropical Ichthyology 2006, 4:291-294.
5. Bunt CM, Katapodis C, McKinley RS. Attraction and passage efficiency of white suckers and smallmouth bass by two Denil fishways. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 1999, 19:793-803.
6. Burford DD, McMahon TE, Cahoon JE, Blank M. Assessment of trout passage through culverts in a large Montana drainage during summer low flow. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2009, 29:739-752.
7. Burwen D, Fleischman S, Maxwell S, Pfisterer C. A retrospective on hydroacoustic assessment of fish passage in Alaskan rivers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 2005, 117:2366-2367.
8. Cahoon JE, McMahon T, Solcz A, Blank M, Stein O. Fish Passage in Montana Culverts: Phase II - Passage Goals 2007a, Helena, MT, The State of Montana Department of Transportation
9. Cahoon JE, McMahon T, Rosenthal L, Blank M, Stein O. Warmwater Species Fish Passage in Eastern Montana Culverts 2007b, Washington, DC, US Department of Transportation Report FHWA/MT-07-009/8182
10. Castro-Santos T. Quantifying the combined effects of attempt rate and swimming capacity on passage through velocity barriers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2004, 61:1602-1615.
11. Castro-Santos T, Haro A. Quantifying migratory delay: a new application of survival analysis methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2003, 60:986-996.
12. Catalano MJ, Bozek MA, Pellett TD. Effects of dam removal on fish assemblage structure and spatial distributions in the Baraboo River, Wisconsin. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2007, 27:519-530.
13. Chanseau M, Larinier M. The behavior of returning adult Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) in the vicinity of a hydroelectric plant on the Gave de Pau river (France) as determined by radiotelemetry. Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses 1998, 257-264. Jungwirth M, Schmutz SWeiss S. In, eds, Oxford, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science
14. Clarkin K, Connor A, Furniss M, Gubernick B, Love M, Moynan K, Musser SW. National Inventory and Assessment Procedure for Identifying Barriers to Aquatic Organism Passage at Road-Stream Crossings 2003, San Dimas, CA, USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Technology and Development Centre
15. Coffman JS. Evaluation of a Predictive Model for Upstream Fish Passage through Culverts. 2005, Master's thesis, Harrisonburg, VA, James Madison University
16. Corsair HJ, Ruch JB, Zheng PQ, Hobbs BF, Koonce JF. Multicriteria decision analysis of stream restoration: potential and examples. Group Decision and Negotiation 2009, 18:387-417.
17. Cote D, Kehler DG, Bourne C, Wiersma YF. A new measure of longitudinal connectivity for stream networks. Landscape Ecology 2009, 24:101-113.
18. Inventory of Barriers to Fish Passage in California's Coastal Watersheds 2004, Oakland, CA, California State Coastal Conservancy (CSSC)
19. Dumont U. Handbuch Querbauwerke (in German) 2005, http://www.umwelt.nrw.de/umwelt/wasser/baeche/wehre/index.php, Dusseldorf, Ministerium fur Umwelt und Naturschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz des Landes NRW. Available online: [accessed 28 May 2008]
20. Dynesius M, Nilsson C. Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 1994, 266:753-762.
21. Mapping hydropower opportunities and sensitivities in England and Wales. 2010, Environment Agency Technical Report
22. Enders EC, Boisclair D, Roy AG. The effect of turbulence on the cost of swimming for juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2003, 60:1149-1160.
23. Environmental Restoration Technical Assistance (ETRA) Website 2009, http://wdfw.wa.gov/hab/tapps/erta.htm, Washington, DC, Department of Fish and Wildlife, Available online: [accessed 12 Oct. 2009]
24. Fausch KD, Rieman BE, Dunham JB, Young MK. Strategies for Conserving Native Salmonid Populations at Risk from Nonnative Fish Invasion: Tradeoffs in using Barriers to Upstream Movement 2006, Fort Collins, CO, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, GTR-RMRS-174
25. Fleishman E, Murphy DD, Brussard PF. A new method for selection of umbrella species for conservation planning. Ecological Applications 2000, 10:569-579.
26. Fish Passage Decision Support System (FPDSS) website 2009, http://fpdss.fws.gov/, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Available online: [accessed 3 Nov. 2009]
27. Furniss M, Love M, Firor S, Moynan K, Llanos A, Guntle J, Gubernick R. FishXing Version 3.0 2006, Corvallis, OR, US Forest Service
28. Gowans ARD, Armstrong JD, Priede IG, McKelvey S. Movement of Atlantic salmon migrating upstream through a fish-pass complex in Scotland. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2003, 12:177-189.
29. Hajkowicz SA. Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions. Journal of Environmental Management 2008, 88:607-614.
30. Haro A, Castro-Santos T, Noreika J, Odeh M. Swimming performance of upstream migrant fishes in open-channel flow: a new approach to predicting passage through velocity barriers. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2004, 61:1591-1601.
31. Hinch SG, Rand PS. Swim speeds and energy use by up-river migrating sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka): role of the local environment and fish characteristics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1998, 57:2470-2478.
32. Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. The flood pulse concept in large river-floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1989, 106:110-127.
33. Karle KF. Analysis of an Efficient Fish Barrier Assessment Protocol for Highway Culverts 2005, Juneau, AK, Alaska Department of Transportation Report FHWA-AK-RD-05-02
34. Keeney RL, Raiffa H. Decisions With Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs 1976, New York, NY, John Wiley
35. Kemp PS, Gessel MH, Williams JG. Fine-scale behavioral responses of Pacific salmonid smolts as they encounter divergence and acceleration of flow. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 2005a, 134:390-398.
36. Kemp PS, Gessel MH, Williams JG. Seaward migrating subyearling Chinook salmon avoid overhead cover. Journal of Fish Biology 2005b, 67:1381-1391.
37. Kemp PS, Gessel MH, Sandford BP, Williams JG. The behavior of Pacific salmonid smolts during passage over two experimental weirs under light and dark conditions. River Research and Applications 2006, 22:429-440.
38. Kemp PS, Russon IJ, Waterson B, O'Hanley J, Pess GR. Recommendations for a " Coarse-Resolution Rapid-Assessment" Methodology to Assess Barriers to Fish Migration and Associated Prioritization Tools - Final Report 2008, Stirling, Scottish Environment Protection Agency
39. From Sea to Source; Practical Guidance for Restoration of Fish Migration in European Rivers 2006, http://www.hunzeenaas.nl/content/nieuws/documenten/1182_Guidancefromseatosource.pdf, Kroes MJGough PSchollema PPWanningen H. eds, Groningen, Interreg IIIC project " Community Rivers" Available online: [accessed 15 May 2008]
40. Kuby MJ, Fagan WF, ReVelle CS, Graf WL. A multiobjective optimization model for dam removal: an example of trading off salmon passage with hydropower and water storage in the Willamette basin. Advances in Water Resources 2005, 28:845-855.
41. Lambeck R. Focal Species: a Multi Species Umbrella for Nature Conservation. Conservation Biology 1996, 11:849-856.
42. Lang M, Love M, Trush W. Improving Stream Crossings for Fish Passage - Final Report 2004, Arcata, CA, Humboldt State University, Prepared for the National Marine Fisheries Service, Contract No. 50ABNF800082
43. Letcher BH, Nislow KH, Coombs JA, O'Donnell MJ, Dubreuil TL. Population response to habitat fragmentation in a stream-dwelling brook trout population. PLoS ONE 2007, 2(11):E1139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.00011139, doi:
44. Lindenmayer DB, Manning AD, Smith PL, Possingham HP, Fischer J, Oliver I, McCarthy MA. The focal species approach and landscape restoration: a critique. Conservation Biology 2002, 16:338-345.
45. Love MS, Firor S, Furniss M, Gubernick R, Dunklin T, Quarles R. FishXing Version 2.2 1999, San Dimas, CA, USDA Forest Service, San Dimas Technology and Development Center (Version 2.1 Helpfiles)
46. Lucas MC, Baras E. Migration of Freshwater Fishes 2001, Oxford, Blackwell Science
47. Lucas MC, Frear PA. Effects of a flow-gauging weir on the migratory behavior of adult barbel, a riverine cyprinid. Journal of Fish Biology 1997, 50:382-396.
48. Lucas MC, Bubb DH, Jang M-H, Ha K, Masters JEG. Availability of and access to critical habitat in regulated rivers: effects of low-head barriers on threatened lampreys. Freshwater Biology 2009, 54:621-634.
49. McLaughlin RL, Hallet A, Pratt TC, O'Connor LM, McDonald DG. Research to guide use of barriers, traps and fishways to control sea lamprey. Journal of Great Lakes Research 2007, 33(Special Issue 2):7-19.
50. Meixler MS, Bain MB, Walter MT. Predicting barrier passage and habitat suitability for migratory fish species. Ecological Modelling 2009, 220:2782-2791.
51. Moghraby C. Impact Assessment of Measures to Address Obstructions to the Free Passage of Migratory and Freshwater Fish 2008, Annex B, Consultation on Modernisation of Salmon and Freshwater Fisheries Legislation; New Order to Address the Passage of Fish, London, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
52. Monden S, De Charleroy D, Van Liefferinge C. Inventory of Fish Migration Barriers on Ecological and Strategic Important Rivers in the Flemish Region (Belgium). 2000, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Freshwater Fish Conservation: Options for the future. 30 October-4 November 2000. Albufeira
53. Newbold SC, Siikamäki J. Prioritizing conservation activities using reserve site selection methods and population viability analysis. Ecological Applications 2009, 19:1774-1790.
54. Niezgoda GH, McKinley RS, White D, Anderson G, Cote D. A dynamic combined acoustic and radio transmitting tag for diadromous fish. Hydrobiologia 1998, 371-372:47-52.
55. Nislow KH, Mendez G. Region 9 Southern Tier National Forest Aquatic Organism Passage Inventory - Final Report 2007, Amherst, MA, USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station
56. Northcote TG. Migratory behavior of fish and its significance to movement through riverine fish passage facilities. Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses 1998, 3-18. Jungwirth MSchmutz SWeiss S. In, eds, Oxford, Fishing News Books, Blackwell Science
57. Oregon Fish Passage Barrier Data Standard Version 1.0. 2007, Salem, OR, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), Bioscience Framework Implementation Team
58. O'Hanley JR, Tomberlin D. Optimizing the removal of small fish passage barriers. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 2005, 10:85-98.
59. Ovidio M, Capra H, Philippart JC. Field protocol for assessing small obstacles to migration of brown trout Salmo trutta, and European grayling Thymallus thymallus: a contribution to the management of free movement in rivers. Fisheries Management and Ecology 2007, 14:41-50.
60. California Fish Passage Assessment Database (PAD) Project: Methodology and Documentation 2009, Sacramento, CA, Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission
61. Paulsen CM, Wernstedt K. Cost-effectiveness analysis for complex managed hydrosystems: an application to the Columbia River basin. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 28:388-400.
62. Peake SJ, Farrell AP. Post-exercise physiology and repeat performance behavior of free-swimming smallmouth bass in an experimental raceway. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 2005, 78:801-807.
63. Pess GR, McHugh ME, Fagen D, Stevenson P, Drotts J. Stillaguamish Salmonid Barrier Evaluation and Elimination Project: Phase III - Final Report 1998, Olympia, WA, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission
64. Peters CN, Marmorek DR. Application of decision analysis to evaluate recovery actions for threatened Snake River spring and summer chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2001, 58:2431-2446.
65. Pinsky ML, Springmeyer DB, Goslin MN, Xanthippe A. Range-wide selection of catchments for Pacific salmon conservation. Conservation Biology 2009, 23:680-691.
66. Poulet N. Impact of weirs on fish communities in a Piedmont stream. River Research and Applications 2007, 23:1038-1047.
67. Raymond HL. Effects of dams and impoundments on migrations of juvenile Chinook salmon and steelhead from the Snake River, 1966 to 1975. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 1979, 108:505-529.
68. Rivinoja P, Leonardsson K, Lundqvist H. Migration success and migration time of gastrically radio-tagged v. PIT-tagged adult Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 2006, 69:304-311.
69. Roni P, Beechie T, Bilby R, Leonetti F, Pollock M, Pess G. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in Pacific Northwest watersheds. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2002, 22:1-20.
70. Roni P, Hanson K, Beechie T. Global review of the physical and biological effectiveness of stream habitat rehabilitation techniques. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2008, 28:856-890.
71. Santucci VJ, Gephard SR, Pescitelli SM. Effects of multiple low-head dams on fish, macroinvertebrates, habitat, and water quality in the Fox River, Illinois. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2005, 25:975-992.
72. Scruton DA, McKinley RS, Kouwen N, Eddy W, Booth RK. Improvement and optimization of fish guidance efficiency (FGE) at a behavioural fish protection system for downstream migrating Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts. River Research and Applications 2003, 19:605-617.
73. Scully RJ, Leitzinger EJ, Petrosky CE. Idaho Habitat Evaluation for Off-Site Mitigation Record 1990, Portland, OR, Bonneville Power Administration, Annual Report 1988, Contract No. DE-A179-84BP133881, 76 pp
74. Sheer MB, Steel EA. Lost watersheds: barriers, aquatic habitat connectivity, and salmon persistence in the Willamette and lower Columbia River Basins. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 2006, 135:1654-1669.
75. Slawski TM, Veraldi FM, Pescitelli SM, Pauers MJ. Effects of tributary spatial position, urbanization, and multiple low-head dams on warmwater fish community structure in a Midwestern stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 2008, 28:1020-1035.
76. Small MP, McLellan JG, Loxterman J, Von Bargen J, Frye A, Bowman C. Fine-scale population structure of rainbow trout in the Spokane river drainage in relation to hatchery stocking and barriers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 2007, 136:301-317.
77. Spens J, Englund G, Lundqvist H. Network connectivity and dispersal barriers: using geographic information systems (GIS) tools to predict landscape scale distribution of a key predator (Esox lucius) among lakes. Journal of Applied Ecology 2007, 44:1127-1137.
78. Steel EA, Feist BE, Jenson D, Pess GR, Sheer MB, Brauner J, Bilby RE. Landscape models to understand steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) distribution and help prioritize barrier removals in the Willamette Basin, OR., USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2004, 69:999-1011.
79. Steig TW, Skalski JR, Ransom BH. Comparison of acoustic and PIT tagged juvenile Chinook, steelhead and sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus, spp.) passing dams on the Columbia River, USA. Aquatic Telemetry: Advances and Applications 2005, Spedicato MT, Lembo G, Marmulla G. In, eds, Proceedings of the Fifth Conference on Fish Telemetry. 9-13 June 2003, Ustica, FAO/COISPA
80. Taylor RN, Love M. California Salmonid Stream Habitat Restoration Manual - Part IX Fish Passage Evaluation at Stream Crossings 2003, Sacramento, CA, California Department of Fish and Game
81. Taylor BR, MacInnis C, Floyd TA. Influence of rainfall and beaver dams on upstream movement of spawning Atlantic salmon in a restored brook in Nova Scotia, Canada. River Research and Applications 2010, 26:183-193.
82. Tudorache C, Viaenen P, Blust R, De Boeck G. Longer flumes increase critical swimming speeds by increasing burst-glide swimming duration in carp Cyprinus carpio, L. Journal of Fish Biology 2007, 71:1630-1638.
83. Van Houdt JKJ, Pinceel J, Flamond MC, Briquet M, Dupont E, Volckaert FAM, Baret PV. Migration barriers protect indigenous brown trout (Salmo trutta) populations from introgression with stocked hatchery fish. Conservation Genetics 2005, 6:175-191.
84. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell KR, Cushing CE. The River Continuum Concept. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1980, 37:130-137.
85. Videler JJ. Fish Swimming 1993, London, Chapman and Hall
86. Wardle CS. Limit of fish swimming speed. Nature 1975, 225:725-727.
87. Warren ML, Pardew MG. Road crossings as barriers to small-stream fish movement. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 1998, 127:637-644.
88. Fish Passage Barrier and Surface Water Diversion Screening Assessment and Prioritization Manual. 2000, http://wdfw.wa.gov/hab/engineer/fishbarr.htm, Olympia, WA, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Habitat Program, 158 pp. Available online: [accessed 12 Jan. 2008]
89. Progress Performance Report for WSDOT Fish Passage Inventory. 2009, http://wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/5853B636-3DE7-482D-A0C3-E7BD8C886CD5/0/2009FishPassageRpt.pdf, Olympia, WA, Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Habitat Program. Available online: [accessed 14 Oct. 2009]
90. Winter HV, Van Densen WLT. Assessing the opportunities for upstream migration of non-salmonid fishes in the weir-regulated River Vecht. Fisheries Management and Ecology 2001, 8:513-532.
91. Winter HV, Jansen HM, Bruijs MCM. Assessing the impact of hydropower and fisheries on downstream migrating silver eel, Anguilla anguilla, by telemetry in the River Meuse. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 2006, 15:221-228.
92. Wofford JEB, Gresswell RE, Banks MA. Influence of barriers to movement on within-watershed genetic variation of coastal cutthroat trout. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:628-637.
93. Wong BBM, Keogh JS, McGlashan DJ. Current and historical patterns of drainage connectivity in eastern Australia inferred from population genetic structuring in a widespread freshwater fish Pseudomugil signifer (Pseudomugilidae). Molecular Ecology 2004, 13:391-401.
94. Wright J, O'Hanley J. A Restoration Framework for Optimizing Habitat Connectivity in Gulf of Maine Watersheds 2009, Geological Society of America Northeastern Section - 44th Annual Meeting. 22-24 March 2009, Portland, Maine
95. Zheng PQ, Hobbs BF, Koonce JF. Optimizing multiple dam removals under multiple objectives: linking tributary habitat and the Lake Erie ecosystem. Water Resources Research 2009, 45:W12417.
96. Zitek A, Haidvogl G, Jungwirth M, Pavlas P, Schmutz S. An Ecologically-based Strategic Guideline for Restoring the Longitudinal Connectivity for Fish in Running Waters of Austria 2008, 4th ECCR International Conference on River Restoration. 16-21 June 2008, Venice, European Centre for River Restoration (ECRR)