The behaviour of Pacific salmonid smolts during passage over two experimental weirs under light and dark conditions

River Research and Applications

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 429-440

  Kemp, Paul S ^a,b   Gessel, Michael H ^a   Sandford, Benjamin P ^a   Williams, John G ^a  

^a NORTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Avoidance; Bypass; Dams; Fish; Flow; Preference

Indexed keywords

DAM; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANT; SALMONID; SMOLT;

ONCORHYNCHUS; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 33744489571     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.913     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Chanseau M. Larinier M. Travade F. 1999. Efficiency of a downstream bypass as estimated by the mark-recapture technique and behaviour of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts at the Bedous water intake on the Aspe River (France) monitored by radiotelemetry. Bulletin Francais de la Peche et de la Pisciculture 353/354: 99-120.
2. Connell SD. 2000. Is there safety-in-numbers for prey? Oikos 88: 527-532.
3. Connor WP, Steinhorst RK, Burge HL. 2003. Migrational behavior and seaward movement of wild subyearling fall Chinook salmon in the Snake River. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 23: 414-430.
4. Coutant CC, Whitney RR. 2000. Fish behavior in relation to passage through hydropower turbines: a review. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 351-380.
5. Croze O, Larinier M. 1999. A study of Atlantic salmon (Salmo solar L.) smolt behaviour at the Pointis hydroelectric powerhouse water intake on the Garonne River and an estimate of downstream migration over the Rodere dam. Bulletin Francais de la Peche et de la Pisciculture 353/354: 141-156.
6. Everest FH, Chapman DW. 1972. Habitat selection and spatial interaction by juvenile Chinook salmon and steelhead trout in two Idaho streams. Journal of Fisheries Research Board Canada 29: 91-100.
7. Flagg TA, Prentice EF, Smith L.S. 1983. Swimming survival and stamina following direct seawater entry during parr-smolt transformation of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Aquaculture 32: 383-396.
8. Gadomski DM, Barfoot CA, Bayer JM, Poe TP. 2001. Early life history of the Northern Pikeminnow in the Lower Columbia River basin. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130: 250-262.
9. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE. 1997a. Familiarity in schooling fish: How long does it take to acquire? Animal Behaviour 53: 945-949.
10. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE. 1997b. Schooling preferences for familiar fish vary with group size in a wild guppy population. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B. Biological Sciences 264: 547-551.
11. Griffiths SW, Magurran AE. 1999. Schooling decisions in guppies (Poecilia reticulate) are based on familiarity rather than kin recognition by phenotype matching. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 45: 437-443.
12. Haro A, Odeh M, Noreika J, Castro-Santos T. 1998. Effect of water acceleration on downstream migratory behavior and passage of Atlantic salmon smolts and juvenile American shad at surface bypasses. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 127: 118-127.
13. Johnson GE, Adams NS, Johnson RL, Rondorf DW, Dauble DD, Barila TY. 2000. Evaluation of the prototype surface bypass for salmonid smolts in spring 1996 and 1997 at Lower Granite Dam on the Snake River, Washington. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 381-397.
14. Johnson RL, Moursund RA. 2000. Evaluation of juvenile salmon behavior at Bonneville Dam, Columbia River, using a multibeam technique. Aquatic Living Resources 13: 313-318.
15. Kelsey DA, Schreck CB, Congleton JL, Davis LE. 2002. Effects of juvenile steelhead on juvenile Chinook salmon behavior and physiology. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 131: 676-689.
16. Kroese ABA, Schellart NAM. 1992. Velocity- and acceleration-sensitive units in the trunk lateral line of the trout. Journal of Neurophysiology 68: 2212-2221.
17. Landa JT. 1998. Bioeconomics of schooling fish: selfish fish, quasi-free riders, and other fishy tales. Environmental Biology of Fishes 53: 353-364.
18. Lobon-Cervia J, Mortensen E, Aarestrup K. 2003. Editorial. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 12: 159.
19. Magurran AE, Seghers BH, Shaw PW, Carvalho GR. 1994. Schooling preferences for familial fish in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Journal of Fish Biology 45: 401-406.
20. Marquette WM, Long CW. 1971. Laboratory studies of screens for diverting juvenile salmon and trout from turbine intakes. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 100: 439-447.
21. McCullagh P, Nelder JA. 1983. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall: New York.
22. McDonald DG, McFarlane WJ, Milligan CL. 1998. Anaerobic capacity and swim performance of juvenile salmonids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1198-1207.
23. Moser ML, Olson AF, Quinn TP. 1991. Riverine and estuarine migratory behavior of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) smolts. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48: 1670-1678.
24. Muir WD, Giorgi AE, Coley TC. 1994. Behavioral and physiological changes in yearling chinook salmon during hatchery residence and downstream migration. Aquaculture 127: 69-82.
25. Peake S, McKinley RS. 1998. A re-evaluation of swimming performance in juvenile salmonids relative to downstream migration. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 682-687.
26. Pitcher TJ, Parrish J. 1993. Functions of shoaling behaviour in teleosts. In Behaviour of teleost fishes, Pitcher TJ (ed.). Chapman and Hall: London; 363-439.
27. Scruton DA, McKinley RS, Kouwen N, Eddy W, Booth RK. 2002. Use of telemetry and hydraulic modeling to evaluate and improve fish guidance efficiency at a louver and bypass system for downstream-migrating Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts and kelts. Hydrobiologia 483: 83-94.
28. Scruton DA, McKinley RS, Kouwen N, Eddy W, Booth RK. 2003. Improvement and optimization of fish guidance efficiency (FGE) at a behavioral fish protection system for downstream migrating Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts. Rivers Research and Applications 19: 605-617.
29. Shelton RGJ, Johnstone ADF, 1995. Preliminary aquarium observations of the schooling behavior of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., smolts on transfer to sea-water. Fisheries Research 24: 73-78.
30. Smith LS. 1982. Decreased swimming performance as a necessary component of the smolt migration in salmon in the Columbia River. Aquaculture 28: 153-161.
31. Steel EA, Guttorp P, Anderson JJ, Caccia DC. 2001. Modeling juvenile salmon migration using a simple Markov chain. Journal of Agricultural Biological and Environmental Statistics 6: 80-88.
32. Svendsen JC, Skov J, Bildsoe M, Steffensenm JF. 2003. Intra-school positional preference and reduced tailbeat frequency in trailing positions in schooling roach under experimental conditions. Journal of Fish Biology 62: 834-846.
33. Ward AJW, Axford S, Krause J. 2003. Cross-species familiarity in shoaling fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences 270: 1157-1161.
34. Ward AJW, Botham MS, Hoare DJ, James R, Broom M, Godin JGJ, Krause J. 2002. Association patterns and shoal fidelity in the three-spined stickleback. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B Biological Sciences 269: 2451-2455.