Evaluation of nipple-areola complex with ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 575-586

  Sarica, Ozgur ^a   Zeybek, Emin ^a   Ozturk, Enis ^b  

^a ISTANBUL TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b Bakirkoy Education Training Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

anatomy; imaging methods; magnetic resonance; nipple periareolar region; pathologies; ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING;

ANATOMICAL STRUCTURES; ANATOMY; DIAGNOSTIC MODALITY; DIAGNOSTICS TECHNIQUES; IMAGING METHOD; MULTIPLE IMAGING MODALITY; NIPPLE PERIAREOLAR REGION;

ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; METHYLENE BLUE;

ANATOMY; BENIGN DUCTAL BREAST DISEASE; BREAST AREOLA; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DISEASE; BREAST DUCT ECTASIA; BREAST LESION; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DUCTOGRAPHY; DUCTOSCOPY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASTITIS; MR DUCTOGRAPHY; NIPPLE; NIPPLE ADENOMA; NIPPLE CALCIFICATION; NIPPLE INVERSION; NIPPLE TUMOR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAGET NIPPLE DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROAREOLAR TUMOR; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN DISEASE; SKIN HORN;

EID: 77955145598     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181d74a88     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Taneri F, Kurukahvecioglu O, Akyurek N, et al. Microanatomy of milk ducts in the nipple. Eur Surg Res. 2006;38:545-549.
2. Going JJ, Moffat DF. Escaping from Flatland: clinical and biological aspects of human mammary duct anatomy in three dimensions. J Pathol. 2004;203:538-544.
3. Love SM, Barsky SH. Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisited. Cancer. 2004;101:1947-1957.
4. Ohtake T, Abe R, Kimijima I, et al. Intraductal extension of primary invasive breast carcinoma treated by breast-conservative surgery. Computer graphic three-dimensional reconstruction of the mammary duct-lobular systems. Cancer. 1995;76:32-45.
5. Ohtake T, Kimijima I, Fukushima T, et al. Computer-assisted complete three-dimensional reconstruction of the mammary ductal/lobular systems: implications of ductal anastomoses for breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 2001;91:2263-2272.
6. Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, et al. The sensitivity of nipple-areola complex an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:905-909.
7. Cardenosa G. Nipple-areolar complex. In: Breast Imaging Companion. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:172.
8. Perlyn C, Edmiston J, Tunnessen WW Jr. Unilateral amastia (Poland syndrome). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:1305-1306.
9. Pacifico MD, Kang NV. The tuberous breast revisited. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:455-464.
10. Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C, et al. MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology. 2000;216:248-254.
11. Giess CS, Keating DM, Osborne MP, et al. Retroareolar breast carcinoma: clinical, imaging, and histopathologic features. Radiology. 1998;207:669-673.
12. Bassett LW, Hirbawi IA, DeBruhl N, et al. Mammographic positioning: evaluation from the view box. Radiology. 1993;188:803-806.
13. Da Costa D, Taddese A, Cure ML. Common and unusual diseases of the nipple-areolar complex. Radiographics. 2007;27:65-77.
14. Kalbhen CL, Kezdi-Rogus PC, Dowling MP. Mammography in the evaluation of nipple inversion. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170: 117-121.
15. Stavros AT. Breast ultrasound. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004.
16. Nicholson BT. Nipple-areolar complex: normal anatomy and benign and malignant processes. RadioGraphics. 2009;29:509-523.
17. Piccoli CW, Feig SA, Vala MA. Benign intraductal papilloma with focal atypical papillomatous hyperplasia. Radiographics. 1998;18: 783-786.
18. Ramsay DT, Kent JC, Hartmann RA, et al. Anatomy of the lactating human breast redefined with ultrasound imaging. J Anat. 2005;206: 525-534.
19. Ballesio L, Maggi C, Savelli S, et al. Adjunctive diagnostic value of ultrasonography evaluation in patients with suspected ductal breast disease. Radiol Med. 2007;112:354-365.
20. Sundararajan S, Tohno E, Kamma H, et al. Role of ultrasonography and MRI in the detection of wide intraductal component of invasive breast cancer-a prospective study. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:252-261.
21. Friedman EP, Hall-Craggs MA, Mumtaz H, et al. Breast MR and the appearance of the normal and abnormal nipple. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:854-861.
22. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathological correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493-501.
23. Morris EA, Liberman L, eds. Breast MRI Diagnosis and Intervention. New York, NY: Springer; 2005:39.
24. Douek M, Hall-Craggs MA. Can the use of preoperative MR imaging reduce local recurrence rates in patients with retroareolar breast cancer who undergo breast-conservation surgery? Radiology. 1999;210:880-881.
25. Cardenosa G, Doudna C, Eklund GW. Ductography of the breast: technique and findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162: 1081-1087.
26. Slawson SH, Johnson BA. Ductography: how to and what if? Radiographics. 2001;21:133-150.
27. Tabar L, Dean PB, Pentek Z. Galactography: the diagnostic procedure of choice for nipple discharge. Radiology. 1983;149:31-38.
28. Sickles EA. Galactography and other imaging investigations of nipple discharge. Lancet. 2000;356:1622-1623.
29. King TA, Carter KM, Bolton LS, et al. A simple approach to nipple discharge. Am Surg. 2000;66:960-966.
30. Koskela A, Berg M, PietilainenT, et al. Breast lesions causing nipple discharge: preoperative galactography-aided stereotactic wire localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1795-1798.
31. Jara H, Barish MA, Yucel EK, et al. MR hydrography: theory and practice of static fluid. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:873-882.
32. Hirose M, Otsuki N, Hayano D, et al. Multivolume fusion imaging of MR ductography and MR mammography for patients with nipple discharge. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2006;5:105-112.
33. Rovno HD, Siegelman ES, Reynolds C, et al. Solitary intraductal papilloma: findings at MR imaging and MR galactography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:151-155.
34. Yucesoy C, Ozturk E, Ozer Y, et al. Conventional galactography and mr contrast galactography for diagnosing nipple discharge: preliminary results. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:426-431.
35. Kurian AW, Hartman AR, Mills MA, et al. Magnetic resonance galactography: a feasibility study in women with prior atypical breast duct cytology. Breast J. 2008;14:211-214.
36. Schwab SA, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R, et al. Direct MR galactography: feasibility study. Radiology. 2008;249:54-61.
37. Kanemaki Y, Kurihar Y, Itoh D, et al. MR mammary ductography using a microscopy coil for assessment of intraductal lesions. AJR Am JRoentgenol. 2004;182:1340-1342.
38. Bhattarai N, Kanemaki Y, Kurihara Y, et al. Intraductal papilloma: features on MR ductography using a microscopic coil. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:44-47.
39. Love SM, Barsky SH. Breast duct endoscopy to study stages of cancerous breast disease. Lancet. 1996;348:997.
40. Dietz JR, Crowe JP, Grundfest S, et al. Directed duct excision by using mammary ductoscopy in patients with pathologic nipple discharge. Surgery. 2002;132:582-587.
41. Matsunaga T, Ohta D, Misaka T, et al. Mammary ductoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of intraductal lesions of the breast. Breast Cancer. 2001;8:213-221.
42. Moncrief RM, Nayar R, Diaz LK, et al. A comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge. Ann Surg. 2005;241:575-581.
43. Kim JA, Crowe JP, Woletz J, et al. Prospective study of intraoperative mammary ductoscopy in patients undergoing partial mastectomy for breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2004;188:411-414.
44. Dooley WC. Breast ductoscopy and the evolution of the intra-ductal approach to breast cancer. Breast J. 2009;15:S90-S94.
45. Tekin E, Akin M, Kurukahvecioglu O, et al. The value of breast ductoscopy in radiologically negative spontaneous/persistent nipple discharge. Breast J. 2009;15:329-332.
46. Ling H, Liu GY, Lu JS, et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy-guided intraductal biopsy improve the diagnosis of nipple discharge. Breast J. 2009;15:168-175.
47. Kapenhas-Valdes E, Feldman SM, Boolbol SK. The role of mammary ductoscopy in breast cancer; a review of the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3350-3360.
48. Grunwald S, Heyer H, Paepke S, et al. Diagnostic value of ductoscopy in the diagnosis of nipple discharge and intraductal proliferations in comparison to standard methods. Onkologie. 2007;30 243-248.
49. Ghanouni P, Kurian AW, Margolis D, et al. Ductal pattern enhancemen on magnetic resonance imaging of the breast due to ductal lavage. Breast J. 2007;13:281-286.
50. Sauter ER, Schlatter L, Lininger J, et al. The association of bloody nipple discharge with breast pathology. Surgery. 2004;136:780-785.
51. Whitaker-Worth DL, Carlone V Susser WS, et al. Dermatologic diseases of the breast and nipple. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43:733-751.
52. Paget J. On the disease of the mammary areola preceding cancer of the mammary gland. St Bartholemew Hospital Res Lond. 1874;10:87-89.
53. Aryal KR, Lengyel AJ, Purser N, et al. Nipple core biopsy for the deformed or scaling nipple. Breast. 2004;13:350-352.
54. Dixon J, Bundred N. Management of disorders of the ductal system and infections. In: Harris J, Lippman M, Morrow M, Osborne C, eds. Diseases of the Breast. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:47-56.
55. Baum M. The breast. In: Mann CV, Russell RCG, Williams NS, eds. Bailey and Love's Short Practice of Surgery. 22nd ed. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall Medical; 1995:544-545.
56. Bates B. The breasts and axillae. In: Bates B, ed. A Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1995:320-329.
57. Bosiwick J. Aesthetic problems. In: Bostwick J, ed. Plastic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery. 1st ed. St Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 1990:487-488.
58. Neville EM, Freeman AH, Adiseshiab M. Clinical significance of recent inversion of the nipple: a reappraisal. J R Soc Med. 1982;75: 111-113.
59. Berg WA, Birdwell RL, Gombos EC. Nipple retraction. In: Berg WA, Birdwell RL, eds. Diagnostic Imaging: Breast. Section IV:3-6. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys; 2006.
60. Kopans D. Breast Imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007:7-43.
61. Thornton CM, Hunt SJ. Sebaceous adenoma with a cutaneous horn. J Cutan Pathol. 1995;22:185-187.
62. Versluijs-Ossewaarde FN, Roumen RM, Goris RJ. Subareolar breast abscesses: characteristics and results of surgical treatment. Breast J. 2005;11:179-182.
63. Renz DM, Baltzer PAT, Bottcher J, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging o: inflammatory breast carcinoma and acute mastitis. A comparative study. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2370-2380.
64. Renz DM, Baltzer PAT, Bottcher J, et al. New signs of tumors in magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(suppl 5):E80-E82.
65. Watkins F, Giacomantonio M, Salisbury S. Nipple discharge and breast lump related to Montgomery's tubercles in adolescent females. J Pediatr Surg. 1988;23:718-720.
66. Berg WA, Birdwell RL, Gombos EC. Lesion imaging characteristics. In: Berg WA, Birdwell RL, eds. Diagnostic Imaging: Breast. Section IV:1-45. Salt Lake City, UT: Amirsys; 2006.
67. Fu P, Kurihara Y, Kanemaki Y, et al. High-resolution MRI in detecting subareolar breast abscess. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1568-1572.
68. Cardenosa G. Major subareolar ducts. In: Breast Imaging Companion. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:184.
69. Sakr R, Rouzier R, Salem C, et al. Risk of breast cancer associated with papilloma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:1304-1308.
70. Bode MK, Rissanen T, Apaja-Sarkkinen M. Ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy in differential diagnosis of papillary breast tumors. Acta Radiol. 2009; 50: 722-729
71. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Kim SM, et al. Papillary lesions of the breast diagnosed at percutaneous sonographically guided biopsy: comparison of sonographic features and biopsy methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:630-636.
72. Daniel BL, Gardner RW, Birdwell RL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of intraductal papilloma of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;21:887-892.
73. Son EJ, Kim EK, Kim JA, et al. Diagnostic value of 3D fast low-angle shot dynamic MRI of breast papillomas. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50:838-844.
74. Ballesio L, Maggi C, Savelli S, et al. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study. Radiol Med. 2008;113:249-264.
75. Fornage BD, Faroux MJ, Pluot M, et al. Nipple adenoma simulating carcinoma: misleading clinical, mammographic, sonographic, and cytologic findings. J Ultrasound Med. 1991;10:55-57.
76. Kijima Y, Matsukita S, Yoshinaka H, et al. Adenoma of the nipple: report of a case. Breast Cancer. 2006;13:95-99.
77. Odashiro M, Lima MG, Miiji LN, et al. Infiltrating syringomatous adenoma of the nipple. Breast J. 2009;15:414-416.
78. Amano G, Yajima M, Moroboshi Y, et al. MRI accurately depicts underlying DCIS in a patient with Paget's disease of the breast without palpable mass and mammography findings. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2005;35:149-153.
79. Adusumilli S, Siegelman ES, Schnall MD. MR findings of nipple adenoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:803-804.
80. Matsubayashi RN, Adachi A, Yasumori K, et al. Adenoma of the nipple correlation of magnetic resonance imaging findings with histologic features. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:148-150.
81. Sanchez JA, Feller WF. Paget's disease of the breast. Am Fam Physician. 1987;36:145-147.
82. Gunhan-Bilgen I, Oktay A. Paget's disease of the breast: clinical, mammographic, sonographic and pathologic findings in 52 cases. Eur J Radiol. 2006;60:256-263.
83. Burke ET, Braeuning MP, McLelland R, et al. Paget disease of breast: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 1998;18:1459Y1464.
84. Frei KA, Bonel HM, Pelte MF, et al. Paget disease of the breast: findings at magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic correlation. Invest Radiol. 2005;40:363Y367.
85. Mitchell ML, Napoletano J, Penman EJ. The MRI appearance of Pagets disease of the nipple: images from a single case. Del Med J. 2006;78:105Y106.
86. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370:485Y492.
87. Van der Velden APS, Schlooz-Vries MS, Boetes C, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ: what is its clinical application? A review. Am J Surg. 2009;198:262Y269.
88. Zhu J, Kurihara Y, Kanemaki Y, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution MRI using a microscopy coil for patients with presumed DCIS following mammography screening. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:96Y103.
89. Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumour extension of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112:461Y474.
90. Tokuda Y, Kuriyama K, Nakamoto A, et al. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:58Y62.
91. Fowble B, Solin LJ, Schultz DJ, Weiss MC. Breast recurrence and survival related to primary tumor location in patients undergoing conservative surgery and radiation for early-stage breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23:933Y939.
92. Rosen PP, Tench W. Lobules in the nipple. Frequency and significance for breast cancer treatment. Pathol Annu. 1985;2(pt 20):317Y322.
93. Menon RS, van Geel AN. Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:81Y84.
94. Smith J, Payne WS, Camey JA. Involvement of the nipple and areola in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:546Y548.
95. Feig SA, Shaber GS, Patchefsky A, et al. Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1977;128:403Y408.
96. Haffty BG, Wilson LD, Smith R, et al. Subareolar breast cancer: long-term results with conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:53Y57.
97. Mammbo NC, Burke JS, Butler JJ. Primary malignant lymphomas of the breast. Cancer. 1977;39:2033Y2040.