Conventional galactography and MR contrast galactography for diagnosing nipple discharge: Preliminary results

Korean Journal of Radiology

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 426-431

  Yucesoy, Cuneyt ^a   Ozturk, Emine ^a   Ozer, Yusuf ^a   Edguer, Tahsin ^a   Hekimoglu, Baki ^a  

^a Ankara Oncology Research and Training Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Breast; Galactography; Magnetic resonance (MR); Nipple discharge

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DISEASE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EXUDATE; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NIPPLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SECRETION;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST DISEASES; CONTRAST MEDIA; EXUDATES AND TRANSUDATES; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NIPPLES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 54349121560     PISSN: 12296929     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.5.426     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dinkel HP, Trusen A, Gassel AM, Rominger M, Lourens S, Muller T, et al. Predictive value of galactographic patterns for benign and malignant neoplasms of the breast in patients with nipple discharge. Br J Radiol 2000;73:706-714
2. Cho N, Moon WK, Chung SY, Cha JH, Cho KS, Kim EK, et al. Ductographic findings of breast cancer. Korean J Radiol 2005;6:31-36
3. Funovics MA, Philipp MO, Lackner B, Fuchsjaeger M, Funovics PT, Metz V. Galactography: method of choice in pathologic nipple discharge? Eur Radiol 2003;13:94-99
4. Slawson SH, Johnson BA. Ductography: how to and what if? Radiographics 2001;21:133-150
5. Heywang Kobrunner SH. Contrast -enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. Invest Radiol 1994;29:94-104
6. Harms SE, Flamig DP. MR imaging of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:277-283
7. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, Cluzel P, Janaud G, Finet JF, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994;191:625-631
8. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, Verdecchia A, Santaquilani M, Musumeci R, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT Study): Interim Results. Radiology 2007;242:698-715
9. Kim do Y, Moon WK, Cho N, Ko ES, Yang SK, Park JS, et al. MRI of the breast for the detection and assessment of the size of ductal carcinoma in situ. Korean J Radiol 2007;8:32-39
10. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BIRADS). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
11. Baker KS, Davey DD, Stelling CB. Ductal abnormalities detected with galactography: frequency of adequate excisional biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:821-824
12. Cardenosa G, Doudna C, Eklund GW. Ductography of the breast: technique and findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:1081-1087
13. Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C, Czerniecki BJ, Siegelman ES, Schnall MD. MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology 2000;216:248-254
14. Rovno HD, Sigelman ES, Reynolds C, Orel SG, Schnall MD. Solitary intraductal papilloma: findings at MR imaging and MR galactography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:151-155
15. Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Iwase T, Takahashi K, Tada T, Uchida Y. Magnetic resonance galactography for a patient with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997;42:87-90
16. Kanemaki Y, Kurihara Y, Itoh D, Kamijo K, Nakajima Y, Fukuda M, et al. MR mammary ductography using a microscopy coil for assessment of intraductal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1340-1342
17. Bhattarai N, Kanemaki Y, Kurihara Y, Nakajima Y, Fukuda M, Maeda I. Intraductal papilloma: features on MR ductography using a microscopic coil. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:44-47
18. Hirose M, Otsuki N, Hayano D, Shinjo H, Gokan T, Kashiwase T, et al. Multi-volume fusion imaging of MR ductography and MR mammography for patients with nipple discharge. Magn Reson Med Sci 2006;5:105-112
19. Brown RR, Clarke DW, Daffner RH. Is a mixture of gadolinium and iodinated contrast material safe during MR arthrography? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1087-1090