Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 58-62

  Tokuda, Yukiko ^a   Kuriyama, Keiko ^a   Nakamoto, Atsushi ^b   Choi, Soomi ^a   Yutani, Kenji ^a   Kunitomi, Yuki ^a   Haneda, Takashi ^a   Kawai, Misa ^a   Masuda, Norikazu ^c   Takeda, Masashi ^a   Nakamura, Hironobu ^b  

^a OSAKA NATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c Department of Surgery ^*  (Japan)

Author keywords

Abnormal nipple discharge; BI RADS MRI; Breast MRI; Nipple discharge; Suspicious nipple discharge

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETISM; MAMMOGRAPHY; RESONANCE;

ABNORMAL NIPPLE DISCHARGE; BI-RADS; BI-RADS MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEMS; BREAST MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING; DESCRIPTORS; HISTOPATHOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS; MALIGNANT LESION; NIPPLE DISCHARGE; SUSPICIOUS NIPPLE DISCHARGE;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DISCHARGE; BREAST FIBROMA; BREAST FIBROSIS; BREAST PAPILLOMA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAMMOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PAPILLOMATOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ALGORITHM; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; BREAST DISEASE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NIPPLE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; BREAST DISEASES; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NIPPLES; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 62149121725     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181671ad2     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Newman HF, Klein M, Northrup JD, et al. Nipple discharge: frequency and pathologenesis in an ambulatory population. N Y State J Med. 1983;83:928-933.
2. Piccoli CW, Feig SA, Vala MA. Breast imaging case of the day. Radiographics. 1998;18:783-786.
3. Winchester DP. Nipple discharge. In: Harris JR, Lippman ME, Morrow M, et al, eds. Diseases of the Breast. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven; 1996:106-110.
4. Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C, et al. MR Imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology. 2000;216:248-254.
5. Ciatto S, Bravetti P, Cariaggi P. Significance of nipple discharge: clinical pattern in the selection of cases for cytologic examination. Acta Cytol. 1986;30:17-20.
6. Tjalma WA, Verslegers IO. Suspicious nipple discharge and breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 2004;10:65-66.
7. Nakahara H, Namba K, Watanabe R, et al. A comparison of MR imaging, galactography and ultrasonography in patient with nipple discharge. Breast cancer. 2003;10:320-329.
8. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:330-337.
9. Tabar L, Dean PB, Pentek Z. Galactography: the diagnostic procedure of choice for nipple discharge. Radiology. 1983;149:31-38.
10. Berg WA, Gilbreath PL. Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation. Radiology. 2000; 214:59-66.
11. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Occult cancer in women with dense breasts: detection with screening US-diagnostic yield and tumor characteristics. Radiology. 1998;207:191-199.
12. Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as a an adjunct to mammography. Radiology. 1999;213:413-422.
13. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, et al. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology. 1995;196:123-134.
14. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology. 1989;171:95-103.
15. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd - DTPA. Preliminary observations. Radiology. 1989;170:681-686.
16. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493-501.
17. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVosi VA, et al. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1994;190:485-493.
18. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, et al. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology. 1994;193:777-781.
19. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101-110.
20. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881-888.
21. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI - RADS). 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
22. Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing nonmasslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187:313-321.
23. Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Iwase T, et al. Magnetic resonance galactography for a patient with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat.1997;42:87- 90.
24. Hirose M, Otsuki N, Hayano D, et al. Multi-volume fusion imaging of MR ductography and MR mammography for patients with nipple discharge. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2006;5:105-112.
25. Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, et al. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2010-1017. Epub 2005 Apr 20.
26. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, et al. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171-178.
27. Kuhl CK, Mielcarek P, Leutner CC, et al. Diagnostic criteria of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI: comparison with invasive breast cancer (IBC) and benign lesions. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med. 1998:93.
28. Tozaki M, Fukuda K. Supine MR mammography using VIBE with parallel acquisition technique for the planning of breast-conserving surgery: clinical feasibility. Breast. 2006;15:137-140.