Moderation of peer assessment in group projects

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 91-108

  Bushell, Graeme ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955131768     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930500262395     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Gatfield, T. (1999) Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 365-377.
2. Goldfinch, J. & Raeside, R. (1990) Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15(3), 210-231.
3. Lejk, M. & Wyvill, M. (2001a) Peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a comparison of holistic and category-based approaches, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), 61-72.
4. Lejk, M. & Wyvill, M. (2001b) The effect of the inclusion of self-assessment with peer assessment of contributions to a group project: a quantitative study of secret and agreed assessments, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(6), 551-561.
5. Li, L. K. Y. (2001) Some refinements on peer assessment of group projects, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), 5-18.
6. Magin, D. J. (2001) A novel technique for comparing the reliability of multiple peer assessments with that of single teacher assessments of group process work, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(2), 139-152.