Magnitude and phase behavior of multiresolution BOLD signal

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering

Volumn 37 B, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 129-145

  Chen, Zikuan ^a   Calhoun, Vince D ^a,b  

^a MIND RESEARCH NETWORK   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

BOLD signal; BOLD simulation; Computational fMRI; Contrast; Gridel; High spatial resolution; Magnitude; Phase; Voxel subdivision

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955112647     PISSN: 15525031     EISSN: 1552504X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.20164     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hyde JS, Biswal BB, Jesmanowicz A. 2001. High-resolution fMRI using multislice partial k-space GREPI with cubic voxels. Magn Reson Med 46:114-125.
2. Kirwan CB, Jones CK, Miller MI, Stark CE. 2007. High-resolution fMRI investigation of the medial temporal lobe. Hum Brain Mapp 28:959-966.
3. Kriegeskorte N, Bandettini P. 2007. Analyzing for information, not activation, to exploit high-resolution fMRI. Neuroimage 38:649-662.
4. Soltysik DA, Hyde JS. 2008. High spatial resolution increases the specificity of block-design BOLD fMRI studies of overt vowel production. Neuroimage 41:389-397.
5. Yoo SS, Guttmann CR, Panych LP. 2001. Multiresolution data acquisition and detection in functional MRI. Neuroimage 14:1476-1485.
6. Lee J, Shahram M, Schwartzman A, Pauly JM. 2007. Complex data analysis in high-resolution SSFP fMRI. Magn Reson Med 57:905-917.
7. Boecker H, Sefat D, Kleinschmidt A. 1995. High-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging of cortical activation during tactile exploration. Hum Brain Mapp 3:161-256.
8. Buxton RB. 2002. Introduction to Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Principle and Techniques. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
9. Rowe DB. 2005. Modeling both the magnitude and phase of complex-valued fMRI data. Neuroimage 25:1310-1324.
10. Rowe DB, Logan BR. 2005. Complex fMRI analysis with unrestricted phase is equivalent to a magnitudeonly model. Neuroimage 24:603-606.
11. Rowe DB, Meller CP, Hoffmann RG. 2007. Characterizing phase-only fMRI data with an angular regression model. J Neurosci Meth 161:331-341.
12. Haacke EM, Brown R, Thompson M, Venkatesan R. 1999. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Physical Principles and Sequence Design. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp 753-754.
13. Bracewell RN. 2000. The Fourier Transform and Its Applications, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
14. Arja SK, Feng Z, Chen Z, Caprihan A, Kiehl KA, Adali T, Calhoun VD. 2009. Changes in fMRI magnitude data and phase data observed in block-design and event-related tasks. Neuroimage 49:3149-3160.
15. Feng Z, Caprihan A, Blagoev KB, Calhoun VD. 2009. Biophysical modeling of phase changes in BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage 47:540-548.
16. Nan FY, Nowak RD. 1999. Generalized likelihood ratio detection for fMRI using complex data. IEEE Trans Med Imag 18:320-329.
17. Rowe DB. 2009. Magnitude and phase signal detection in complex-valued fMRI data. Magn Reson Med 62:1356-1357; author reply 1358-1360.
18. Rowe DB, Logan BR. 2004. A complex way to compute fMRI activation. Neuroimage 23:1078-1092.
19. Xu Y, Wu G, Rowe DB, Ma Y, Zhang R, Xu G, Li SJ. 2007. COmplex-Model-Based Estimation of thermal noise for fMRI data in the presence of artifacts. Magn Reson Imag 25:1079-1088.
20. Zhao F, Jin T, Wang P, Hu X, Kim SG. 2007. Sources of phase changes in BOLD and CBV-weighted fMRI. Magn Reson Med 57:520-527.
21. Menon RS. 2003. Simulation of BOLD phase and magnitude changes in a voxel. Proc Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 11:1719.
22. Pathak AP, Ward BD, Schmainda KM. 2008. A novel technique for modeling susceptibility-based contrast mechanisms for arbitrary microvascular geometries: the finite perturber method. Neuroimage 40:1130-1143.
23. Martindale J, Kennerley AJ, Johnston D, Zheng Y, Mayhew JE. 2008. Theory and generalization of Monte Carlo models of the BOLD signal source. Magn Reson Med 59:607-618.
24. Chen Z, Molloi S. 2003. Automatic 3D vascular tree construction in CT angiography. Comput Med Imag Graph 27:469-479.
25. Chen Z, Ning R. 2005. Supergridded cone-beam reconstruction and its application to point-spread function calculation. Appl Opt 44:4615-4624.
26. Chen Z, Ning R. 2004. Breast volume denoising and noise characterization by 3D wavelet transform. Comput Med Imag Graph 28:235-246.
27. Salomir R, de Senneville BD, Moonen CTW. 2003. A fast calculation method for magnetic field inhomogeneity due to an arbitrary distribution of bulk susceptibility. Concepts Magn Reson B 19:26-34.
28. Koch KM, Papademetris X, Rothman DL, de Graaf RA. 2006. Rapid calculations of susceptibilityinduced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance. Phys Med Biol 51:6381-6402.
29. Marques JP, Bowtell R. 2005. Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility Concepts Magn Reson B 25:65-78.
30. Kiselev VG, Posse S. 1999. Analytical model of susceptibility-induced MR signal dephasing: effect of diffusion in a microvascular network. Magn Reson Med 41:499-509.
31. Hendricks WA, Robey KW. 1936. The sampling distribution of the coefficient of variation. Ann Math Statist 7:129-132.
32. Rogers T.2010. Amazing applications of probability and statistics. Available at http://www.intuitor.com/statistics/CentralLim.html (accessed on March 25, 2010).
33. Boxerman JL, Bandettini PA, Kwong KK, Baker JR, Davis TL, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. 1995. The intravascular contribution to fMRI signal change: Monte Carlo modeling and diffusion-weighted studies in vivo. Magn Reson Med 34:4-10.
34. Ogawa S, Tank DW, Menon R, Ellermann JM, Kim SG, Merkle H, Ugurbil K. 1992. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:5951-5955.