Binding specificity of recombinant odorant-binding protein isoforms is driven by phosphorylation

Journal of Chemical Ecology

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 801-813

  Brimau, Fanny ^a   Cornard, Jean Paul ^b   Le Danvic, Chrystelle ^a   Lagant, Philippe ^a   Vergoten, Gerard ^a   Grebert, Denise ^c   Pajot, Edith ^c   Meillour, Patricia Nagnan Le ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DES SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIES DE LILLE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DES SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIES DE LILLE   (France)

^c CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Anion exchange HPLC; Fluorescence spectroscopy; Heterologous expression; Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI TOF) mass spectrometry; Odorant binding protein; Peptide mapping; Pheromone; Phosphorylation; Polymerase chain reaction (PCR); Recombinant protein; Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS PAGE); Sus scrofa; Western blotting

Indexed keywords

ISOPROTEIN; LIGAND; ODORANT BINDING PROTEIN; ODORANT-BINDING PROTEIN; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN;

CHEMICAL BINDING; CHEMICAL ECOLOGY; COEXISTENCE; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; ION EXCHANGE; LIGAND; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MAMMAL; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PHEROMONE; PIG; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROTEIN; RECOMBINATION; YEAST;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; CHO CELL; CRICETULUS; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; FEMALE; HAMSTER; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MALE; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR GENETICS; OLFACTORY RECEPTOR; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; SPECTROFLUOROMETRY; SWINE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; CHO CELLS; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; FEMALE; LIGANDS; MALE; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ISOFORMS; RECEPTORS, ODORANT; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SPECTROMETRY, FLUORESCENCE; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY; SWINE;

ANIMALIA; EUKARYOTA; MAMMALIA; PICHIA PASTORIS; PROKARYOTA; SUIDAE; SUS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 77955057365     PISSN: 00980331     EISSN: 15731561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-010-9820-4     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Brennan, P. A., and Kendrick, K. M. 2006. Mammalian social odours: attraction and individual recognition. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 361: 2061-2078.
2. Briand, L., Nespoulous, C., Perez, V., Rémy, J.-J., Huet, J.-C., and Pernollet, J.-C. 2000. Ligand-binding properties and structural characterization of a novel rat odorant-binding protein variant. Eur. J. Biochem. 267: 3079-3089.
3. Buck, L. 2004. Olfactory receptors and odor coding in mammals. Nutr. Rev. 62: S184-188 & S224-241.
4. Burova, T. V., Choiset, C. K., Jankowski, T., and Haertle, T. 1999. Conformational stability and binding properties of porcine odorant binding protein. Biochemistry 38: 15043-15051.
5. Daly, R. and Hearn, M. T. W. 2005. Expression of heterologous proteins in Pichia pastoris: a useful experimental tool in protein engineering and production. J. Mol. Recognit. 18: 119-138.
6. Dorries, K. M., Adkins-Reagan, E., and Halpern, B. P. 1995. Olfactory sensitivity to the pheromone, androstenone, is sexually dimporphic in the pig. Physiol. Behav. 57: 255-259.
7. Golebiowski, J., Antonczak, S., and Cabrol-Bass, D. 2006. Molecular dynamics studies of odorant binding protein free of ligand and complexed to pyrazine and octenol. J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem) 763: 165-174.
8. Golebiowski, J., Antonczak, S., Fiorucci, S., and Cabrol-Bass, D. 2007. Mechanistic events underlying odorant binding protein chemoreception. Proteins 67: 448-458.
9. Guiraudie, G., Pageat, P., Cain, A.-H., Madec, I., and Nagnan-Le Meillour, P. 2003. Functional characterization of olfactory binding proteins for appeasing compounds and molecular cloning in the vomeronasal organ of pre-pubertal pigs. Chem. Senses 28: 609-619.
10. Katkov, T., Booth, W. D., and Gower, D. B. 1972. The metabolism of 16-androstenes in boar salivary glands. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 270: 546-556.
11. Kato, A. and Touhara, K. 2009. Mammalian olfactory receptors: pharmacology, G protein coupling and desensitization. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 66: 3743-3753.
12. Ko, H. J. and Park, T. H. 2008. Enhancement of odorant detection sensitivity by the expression of odorant-binding protein. Biosens. Bioelectron. 23: 1017-1023.
13. Ko, H. J., Lee, S. H., Oh, E. H., and Park, T. H. 2010. Specificity of odorant-binding proteins: a factor influencing the sensitivity of olfactory receptor-based biosensors. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 33: 55-62.
14. Lakowitz, J. R. 1999. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. 2nd edition. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York.
15. Le Danvic, C., Guiraudie-Capraz, G., Abderrahmani, D., Zanetta, J.-P., and Nagnan-Le Meillour, P. 2009. Natural ligands of porcine olfactory binding proteins. J. Chem. Ecol. 35: 741-751.
16. Loëbel, D., Marchese, S., Krieger, J., Pelosi, P., and Breer, H. 1998. Sub-types of odorant-binding proteins-Heterologous expression and ligand binding. Eur. J. Biochem. 254: 318-324.
17. Mann, M., Ong, S. E., Gronborg, M., Steen, H., Jensen, O. N., and Pandey, A. 2002. Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. Trends Biotechnol. 20: 261-268.
18. McGlone, J. J. 1985. Olfactory cues and pig agonistic behavior: evidence for a submissive pheromone. Physiol. Behav. 34: 195-198.
19. McGlone, J. J. and Morrow, J. L. 1988. Reduction of pig agonistic behavior by androstenone. J. Anim. Sci. 66: 880-884.
20. McGlone, J. J., and Anderson, D. L. 2002. Synthetic maternal pheromone stimulates feeding behavior and weight gain in weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 3179-3183.
21. McKerell, A. D. Jr., Bashford, D., Bellott, R. L., Dunbrack, R. L. JR., Evanseck, J. D., Field, M. J., Fischer, S., Gao, J., Guo, H., Ha, S., Joseph-McCarthy, D., Kuchnir, L., Kuczera, K., Lau, F. T. K., Mattos, C., Michnick, S., Ngo, T., Nguyen, D. T., Prodhom, B., Reiher, W. E. III, Roux, B., Schlenkrich, M., Smith, J.-C., Stote, R., Straub, J., Watanabe, M., Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera, J., Yin, D., and Karplus, M. 1998. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modelling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 102: 3586.
22. Nagnan-Le Meillour, P., Lagant, P., Cornard, J.-P., Brimau, F., Le Danvic, C., Vergoten, G., and Michalski, J.-C. 2009a. Phenylalanine 35 and tyrosine 82 are involved in the uptake and release of ligand by porcine odorant-binding protein. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1794: 1142-1150.
23. Nagnan-Le Meillour, P., Le Danvic, C., Brimau, F., Chemineau, P., and Michalski, J.-C. 2009b. Phosphorylation of native porcine olfactory binding proteins. J. Chem. Ecol. 35: 752-760.
24. Narhi, L. O., Arakawa, T., Aoki, K. H., Elmore, R., Rohde, M. F., Boone, T., and Strickland, T. W. 1991. The effect of carbohydrate on the structure and stability of erythropoietin. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 23022-23026.
25. Nath, D., Maiti, A., and Majumder, G. C. 2008. Cell surface phosphorylation by a novel ecto-protein kinase: a key regulator of cellular functions in spermatozoa. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1778: 153-165.
26. Paolini, S., Tanfani, F., Fini, C., Bertoli, E., and Pelosi, P. 1999. Porcine odorant-binding protein: structural stability and ligand affinities measured by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1431: 179-188.
27. Parisi, M., Mazzini, A., Tibor Sorbi, R., Ramoni, R., Grolli, S., and Favilla, R. 2005. Role of the disulfide bridge in folding, stability and function of porcine odorant binding protein: Spectroscopic equilibrium studies on C63A/C155A double mutant. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1750: 30-39.
28. Pelosi, P. 1996. Perireceptor events in olfaction. J. Neurobiol. 30: 3-19.
29. Pelosi, P. 2001. The role of perireceptor events in vertebrate olfaction. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58: 503-509.
30. Pelosi, P., Baldaccini, N. E., and Pisanelli, A. M. 1982. Identification of a specific olfactory receptor for 2-isobutyl-3 methoxypyrazine. Biochem. J. 201: 245-248.
31. Spinelli, S., Ramoni, R., Grolli, S., Bonicel, J., Cambillau, C., and Tegoni, M. 1998. The structure of the monomeric porcine odorant binding protein sheds light on the domain swapping mechanism. Biochemistry 37: 7913-7918.
32. Tcatchoff, L., Nespoulous, C., Pernollet, J.-C., and Briand, L. 2006. A single lysyl residue defines the binding specificity of human odorant-binding protein for aldehydes. FEBS Lett. 580: 2102-2108.
33. Tirindelli, R., Dibattista, M., Pifferi, S., and Menini, A. 2009. From pheromones to behavior. Physiol. Rev. 89: 921-956.
34. Vidic, J., Grosclaude, J., Monnerie, R., Persuy, M. A., Badonnel, K., Baly, C., Caillol, M., Briant, L., Salesse, R., and Pajot-Augy, E. 2008. On a chip demonstration of a functional role for odorant binding protein in the preservation of olfactory receptor activity at high odorant concentration. Lab. Chip 8: 678-688.
35. Vincent, F., Spinelli, S., Ramoni, R., Grolli, S., Pelosi, P., Cambillau, C., and Tegoni, M. 2000. Complexes of odorant binding protein with odorant molecules belonging to different chemical classes. J. Mol. Biol. 300: 127-139.
36. Wei, Y., Brandazza, A., and Pelosi, P. 2008. Binding of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to mutants of odorant-binding protein: a first step towards biosensors for environmental monitoring. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1784: 666-671.