Numerical study of shock propagation and attenuation in narrow tubes including friction and heat losses

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1711-1721

  Ngomo, D ^a   Chaudhuri, A ^a   Chinnayya, A ^a   Hadjadj, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

Author keywords

Friction; Heat losses; Shock propagation; WENO schemes

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSIVE REGIME; DISCRETIZATIONS; DISSIPATIVE PROCESS; ESSENTIALLY NON-OSCILLATORY; HEAT EXCHANGE; ISOTHERMAL REGIME; LENGTH SCALE; NARROW TUBES; NUMERICAL SIMULATION; NUMERICAL STUDIES; NUMERICAL TESTS; ONE-DIMENSIONAL APPROACH; SCALING PARAMETER; SHOCK PROPAGATION; SHOCK SPEED; TIME EVOLUTIONS; TUBE DIAMETERS; WENO SCHEMES;

ASYMPTOTIC ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FRICTION; HEAT LOSSES; REYNOLDS NUMBER; TRIBOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC WAVE PROPAGATION;

EID: 77955050172     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2010.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson J.D. Modern compressible flow, with historical perspective 1982, McGraw-Hill.
2. Badcock K.J. A numerical simulation of boundary layer effects in a shock tube. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 1992, 14:1151-1171.
3. Batten P., Leschziner M., Goldberg U.C. Average-state Jacobians and implicit methods for compressible viscous and turbulent flows. J Comput Phys 1997, 137:38-78.
4. Borges R., Carmona M., Costa B., Don W.S. An improved weighted essentially non-oscillatory scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws. J Comput Phys 2009, 227:3191-3211.
5. Bouchut F., Ounaissa H., Perthame B. Upwinding of the source term at interfaces for Euler equations with high friction. Comput Math Appl 2007, 53:361-375.
6. Brouillette M. Shock waves at microscales. Shock Waves 2003, 13:3-12.
7. Chigullappalli S, Venkattraman A, Alexeenko AA. Modeling of viscous shock tube using ES-BGK model kinetic equations. AIAA paper 2009-1317.
8. Daru V., Tenaud C. Numerical simulation of the viscous shock tube problem by using a high resolution monotonicity-preserving scheme. Comput Fluids 2009, 38:664-676.
9. Daru V., Tenaud C. Evaluation of TVD high resolution schemes for unsteady viscous shocked flows. Comput Fluids 2001, 30:89-113.
10. Duff R.E. Shock-tube performance at low initial pressure. Phys Fluids 1959, 2:207-216.
11. Ferziger J.H., Kaper H.G. Mathematical theory of transport processes in gases 1972, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
12. Harten A., Lax P.D., van Leer B. On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J 1983, 25:35-61.
13. Henrick A.K., Aslam T.D., Powers J.M. Mapped weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes: achieving optimal order near critical points. J Comput Phys 2005, 207:542-567.
14. Iancu F., Muller N. Efficiency of shock wave compression in a microchannel. Microfluid Nanofluid 2006, 2:50-63.
15. Jiang G.S., Shu C.-W. Efficient implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes. J Comput Phys 1996, 126:202-228.
16. Johnsen E., Colonius T. Implementation of WENO schemes in compressible multicomponent flow problems. J Comput Phys 2006, 219:715-732.
17. Miniati F., Colella P. A modified higher order Godunov's scheme for stiff source conservative hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys 2007, 224:519-538.
18. Mirshekari G., Brouillette M. One-dimensional model for microscale shock tube flow. Shock Waves 2009, 19:25-38.
19. Ockendon H., Ockendon J.R., Falle S. The Fanno model for turbulent compressible flow. J Fluid Mech 2001, 445:187-206.
20. Novikovs A., Ockendon H., Ockendon J.R. Numerical solutions of the unsteady Fanno model for compressible pipe flow. J Fluid Mech 2007, 579:493-507.
21. Qiu J., Shu C.-W. On the construction, comparison, and local characteristic decomposition for high-order central WENO schemes. J Comput Phys 2002, 183:187-209.
22. Shen Y., Yang G., Gao Z. High-resolution finite compact difference schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J Comput Phys 2006, 216:114-137.
23. Shu C.-W. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes. J Comput Phys 1989, 83:32-78.
24. Shu C-W. Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. NASA/CR-97-206253 ICASE report no. 97-65; 1997.
25. Shu C.-W., Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J Comput Phys 1988, 77:439-471.
26. Strang G. On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM J Numer Anal 1968, (3):506-517.
27. Sun M, Ogawa T, Takayama K. Shock propagation in narrow channels. ISSW23l, Fort Worth (TX); 2001.
28. Toro E.F., Spruce M., Speares W. Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver. Shock Waves 1994, 4:25-34.
29. Yamaleev N.K., Carpenter M.H. A systematic methodology for constructing high-order energy stable WENO schemes. J Comput Phys 2009, 228:4248-4272.
30. Zeitoun D., Burtschell Y. Navier-Stokes computations in micro shock tubes. Shock Waves 2006, 15:241-246.