Evaluation of TVD high resolution schemes for unsteady viscous shocked flows

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 89-113

  Daru, Virginie ^a   Tenaud, Christian ^b  

^a DYNFLUID LABORATORY   (France)

^b UFR 919 Laboratoire d'Informatique Pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l'Ingénieur   (France)

Author keywords

Computational fluid dynamics; Reflected shock; Shock boundary layer interaction; Shock tube

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHOCK TUBES; SHOCK WAVES; UNSTEADY FLOW; VISCOUS FLOW;

DISCRETIZATION;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

BOUNDARY LAYER; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHOCK WAVE; UNSTEADY FLOW; VISCOUS FLOW;

EID: 0034258009     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7930(00)00006-2     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Jeng NY, Payne UJ. An adaptive TVD limiter. Journal of Computational Physics 1995; 118:229-41.
2. Arora M, Roe PL. A well-behaved TVD limiter for high-resolution calculations of unsteady flows. Journal of Computational Physics 1997; 132:3-11.
3. Daru V, Fernandez G, Tenaud C. On CFD to investigate bifurcated shock wave pattern. In: Houwing AFP, editor. Proceedings of the 21st International Symposium on Shock Waves, Australia. Fyshwick: Panther Publishing & Printing, 1997. p. 1091-7.
4. Roe PL, Baines MJ. Algorithms for advection and shock problems. In: Viviand H, editor. Proceedings of the Fourth GAMM Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1981. p. 281-90 Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, 5.
5. Kleine H, Lyakhov LG, Gvozdeva LG, Gronig H. Bifurcation of a reflected shock wave in a shock tube. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Shock Waves, Sendai. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1991. p. 261-6.
6. Wilson GJ, Sharma SP, Gillespie WD. Time-dependent simulation of reflected-shock/boundary layer interaction in shock tubes. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Shock Waves, Marseille. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993. p. 439-44.
7. Weber YS, Oran ES, Boris JP, Anderson JD. The numerical simulation of shock bifurcation near the end wall of a shock tube. Physics of Fluids 1995;7:2475-88.
8. Abarbanel S, Gottlieb D. Optimal time splitting for two and three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations with mixed derivatives. Journal of Computational Physics 1981;41:1-33.
9. Shu CW, Zang TA, Erlebacher G, Whitaker D, Osher S. High-order ENO schemes applied to two- and three-dimensional compressible flow. Applied Numerical Mathematics: Transactions of IMACS 1992;9:45-71.
10. Roe PL. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics 1981;43:357-72.
11. Harten A. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics 1983;49:357-93.
12. Yee HC, Harten A. Implicit TVD schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws in curvilinear coordinates. AIAA Journal 1987;25:266-74.
13. Yee, H.C., Numerical experiments with a symmetric high resolution shock-capturing scheme. NASA TM-88325, (1986).
14. Yee, H.C., On the implementation of a class of upwind schemes for system of hyperbolic conservation laws. NASA TM-86839, (1985).
15. Shu CW, Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. II, Journal of Computational Physics 1989;83:32-79.
16. Lin SY, Chin YS. Comparison of higher resolution Euler schemes for aeroacoustic computation. AIAA Journal 1995;33:237-45.