On the construction, comparison, and local characteristic decomposition for high-order central WENO schemes

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 183, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 187-209

  Qiu, Jianxian ^a   Shu, Chi Wang ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Central scheme; High order accuracy; Local characteristic decomposition; WENO scheme

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL SCHEME; CENTRAL WEIGHTED ESSENTIALLY NON-OSCILLATORY SCHEMES; ESSENTIALLY NON-OSCILLATORY SCHEMES; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER ORDER ACCURACY; HIGHER-ORDER; LOCAL CHARACTERISTIC DECOMPOSITION; LOCAL CHARACTERISTICS; WEIGHTED ESSENTIALLY NONOSCILLATORY; WEIGHTED ESSENTIALLY NONOSCILLATORY SCHEME;

RUNGE KUTTA METHODS;

EID: 0037146401     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2002.7191     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. P. Arminjon and M.-C. Viallon, Généralisation du schéma de Nessyahu-Tadmor pour une Équation hyperbolique à deux dimensions d'espace, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 320, 85 (1995).
2. P. Arminjon, M.-C. Viallon, and A. Madrane, A finite volume extension of the Lax-Friedrichs and Nessyahu-Tadmor schemes for conservation laws on unstructured grids, Int. J. Comp. Fluid Dynam. 9, 1 (1997).
3. D. S. Balsara and C.-W. Shu, Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy, J. Comput. Phys. 160, 405 (2000).
4. F. Bianco, G. Puppo, and G. Russo, High-order central schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21, 294 (1999).
5. A. Harten, B. Engquist, S. Osher, and S. Chakravathy, Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III, J. Comput. Phys. 71, 231 (1987).
6. C. Hu and C.-W. Shu, Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes on triangular meshes, J. Comput. Phys. 150, 97 (1999).
7. G.-S. Jiang and C.-W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202 (1996).
8. G.-S. Jiang and E. Tadmor, Non-oscillatory central schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19, 1892 (1998).
9. G.-S. Jiang, D. Levy, C.-T. Lin, S. Osher, and E. Tadmor, High-resolution non-oscillatory central schemes with non-staggered grids for hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35, 2147 (1998).
10. A. Kurganov and D. Levy, A third-order semidiscrete central scheme for conservation laws and convection-diffusion equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 22, 1461 (2000).
11. A. Kurganov, S. Noelle, and G. Petrova, Semi-discrete central-upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton-Jacobi equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 23, 707 (2001).
12. A. Kurganov and G. Petrova, Central schemes and contact discontinuities, Math. Model. Numer Anal. 34, 1259 (2000).
13. A. Kurganov and G. Petrova, A third order semi-discrete genuinely multidimensional central scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws and related problems, Numer. Math. 88, 683 (2001).
14. A. Kurganov and E. Tadmor, New high-resolution central schemes for nonlinear conservation laws and convection-diffusion equations, J. Comput. Phys. 160, 214 (2000).
15. D. Levy, G. Puppo, and G. Russo, Central WENO schemes for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 33, 547 (1999).
16. D. Levy, G. Puppo, and G. Russo, Compact central WENO schemes for multidimensional conservation laws, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 22, 656 (2000).
17. D. Levy, G. Puppo, and G. Russo, On the behavior of the total variation in CWENO methods for conservation laws, Appl. Numer. Math. 33, 407 (2000).
18. D. Levy, G. Puppo, and G. Russo, A third order central WENO scheme for 2D conservation laws, Appl. Numer. Math. 33, 415 (2000).
19. X. D. Liu and S. Osher, Convex ENO high order multi-dimensional schemes without field by field decomposition or staggered grids, J. Comput. Phys. 142, 304 (1998).
20. X. D. Liu and S. Osher, Nonoscillatory high order accurate self-similar maximum principle satisfying shock capturing schemes I, SIAM. J. Numer. Anal. 33, 760 (1996).
21. X. D. Liu and E. Tadmor, Third order nonoscillatory central scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws, Numer. Math. 79, 397 (1998).
22. X. D. Liu, S. Osher, and T. Chan, Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 115, 200 (1994).
23. H. Nessyahu and E. Tadmor, Non-oscillatory central differencing for hyperbolic conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 87, 408 (1990).
24. R. Sanders and A. Weiser, High resolution staggered mesh approach for nonlinear hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, J. Comput. Phys. 101, 314 (1992).
25. J. Shi, C. Hu, and C.-W. Shu, A technique of treating negative weights in WENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 175, 108 (2002).
26. C.-W. Shu, Numerical experiments on the accuracy of ENO and modified ENO schemes, J. Sci. Comput. 5, 127 (1990).
27. C.-W. Shu, Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, in Advanced Numerical Approximation of Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, edited by B. Cockburn, C. Johnson, C.-W. Shu, and E. Tadmor, Lect. Notes in Math. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, 1998), Vol. 1697, p. 325.
28. C.-W. Shu and S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 77, 439 (1988).
29. C.-W. Shu and S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock capturing schemes, II, J. Comput. Phys. 83, 32 (1989).
30. M. Zennaro, Natural continuous extensions of Runge-Kutta methods, Math. Comput. 46, 119 (1986).