Phylogenetic composition of angiosperm diversity in the cloud forests of Mexico

Biotropica

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 444-454

  Luna Vega, Isolda ^a   Magallón, Susana ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Angiosperm phylogeny; Biodiversity; G test; Mesoamerica; Neotropics; Phylogenetic level; Tropical wet forest

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; CLADISTICS; CLOUD FOREST; DIVERGENCE; NEOTROPICAL REGION; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SURVIVAL; TAXONOMY;

MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA];

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 77955034076     PISSN: 00063606     EISSN: 17447429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2009.00606.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anderson C L, Bremer K, Friis E M. Dating phylogenetically basal eudicots using rbcL sequences and multiple fossil reference points. Am. J. Bot. 2005, 92:1737-1748.
2. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1998, 85:531-553. APG.
3. An update of the angiosperm phylogeny group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APGII. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2003, 141:399-436. APG II.
4. Bremer K, Friis E M, Bremer B. Molecular phylogenetic dating of asterid flowering plants shows early Cretaceous diversification. Syst. Biol. 2004, 53:496-505.
5. Burleigh J G, Hilu K W, Soltis D E. Inferring phylogenies with incomplete data sets: A 5-gene, 567-taxon analysis of angiosperms. BMC Evol. Biol. 2009, 9:61.
6. Campos Villanueva A. 2008, La distribución filogenética de la diversidad de angiospermas del bosque tropical húmedo de México. MSc dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
7. 2007, http://www.conabio.gob.mx, CONABIO., Comisión Nacional para el Uso y Conocimiento de la Biodiversidad, México. Available at, (accessed August 2007)
8. Cronquist A. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants 1981, Columbia University Press, New York, New York
9. Dial K P, Marzluff J M. Nonrandom diversification within taxonomic assemblages. Syst. Zool. 1989, 38:26-37.
10. Diniz-Filho J A F, Rangel T F L V B, Bini L M, Hawkins B A. Macroevolutionary dynamics in environmental space and the latitudinal diversity gradient in New World birds. Proc. R. Soc. B 2007, 274:43-52.
11. Donoghue M J. A phylogenetic perspective on the distribution of plant diversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008, 105:11549-11555.
12. Drummond A J, Rambaut A. Beast: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 2007, 7:214.
13. ArcView GIS 3.2a 1999, ESRI., Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc, Redlands, California
14. Faith D P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Cons. 1992, 61:1-10.
15. Feild T S, Arens N C, A Doyle J, Dawson T E, Donoghue M J. Dark and disturbed: As new image of early angiosperm ecology. Paleobiology 2004, 30:82-107.
16. Fine P V A, Daly D C, Villa Muñoz G, Mesones I, Cameron K M. The contribution of edaphic heterogeneity to the evolution and diversity of Burseraceae trees in the western Amazon. Evolution 2005, 59:1464-1478.
17. Forest F, Grenyer R, Rouget M, Davies T J, Cowling R M, Faith D P, Balmford A, Manning J C, Proche S, Van Der Bank M, Reeves G, Hedderson T A J, Savolainen V. Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 2007, 445:757-760.
18. Goldberg E E, Roy K, Lande R, Jablonski D. Diversity, endemism, and age distributions in macroevolutionary sources and sinks. Am. Nat. 2005, 165:623-633.
19. Hawkins B A, Diniz-Filho J A F, Jaramillo C A, Soeller S A. Post-Eocene climate change, niche conservatism, and the latitudinal diversity gradient of New World birds. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:770-780.
20. Heard S B, Cox G H. The shape of phylogenetic trees of clades, faunas, and local assemblages: Exploring spatial pattern in differential diversification. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:E107-E118.
21. Helmus M, Bland T J, Williams C K, Ives A R. Phylogenetic measures of biodiversity. Am. Nat. 2007, 169:E68-E83.
22. Jansen R K, Cai Z, Raubeson L A, Daniell H, Depamphilis C W, Leebens-Mack J, MÜller K F, Guisinger-Bellian M, Haberle R C, Hansen A K, Chumley T W, Lee S, Peery R, Mcneal J R, Kuehl J V, Boore J L. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:19369-19374.
23. Janssen T, Bremer K. The age of major monocot groups inferred from 800+rbcL sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2004, 146:385-398.
24. Judd W S, Campbell C S, Kellogg E A, Stevens P F, Donoghue M J. Plant systematics-a phylogenetic approach 2002, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts
25. Lavin M, Herendeen P S, Wojciechowski M F. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates rapid diversification of lineages during the Tertiary. Syst. Biol. 2005, 54:530-549.
26. Lavin M, Schrire B P, Lewis G, Pennington R T, Delgado-Salinas A, Thulin M, Hughes C E, Beyra Matos A, Wojciechowski M. Metacommunity process rather than continental tectonic history better explains geographically structured phylogenies in legumes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 2004, 359:1509-1522.
27. Luna I, Almeida L, Villers L, Lorenzo L. Reconocimiento florístico y consideraciones fitogeográficas del bosque mesófilo de montaña de Teocelo, Veracruz. Bol. Soc. Bot. México 1988, 48:35-63.
28. Luna I, Velázquez A, Velázquez E. México. Bosques nublados del Neotropico 2001, 183-229. Kappelle M, Brown A D, (Eds.), pp, INBIO, UICN, Costa Rica
29. Mabberley D J. The plant-book. A portable dictionary of the vascular plants 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
30. Magallón S, Castillo A. Angiosperm diversification through time. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96:349-365.
31. Moore M J, Bell C D, Soltis P S, Soltis D E. Using plastid genome-scale data to resolve enigmatic relationships among basal angiosperms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:19363-19368.
32. Myers N, Mittermeier R A, Mittermeier C G, Da Fonseca G A B, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
33. Pennington R T, Richardson J E, Lavin M. Insights into the historical construction of species-rich biomes from dated plant phylogenies, neutral ecological theory and phylogenetic community structure. New Phytol. 2006, 172:605-616.
34. Prinzing A, Ozinga W A, Durka W. The relationship between global and regional distribution diminishes among phylogenetically basal species. Evolution 2004, 58:2622-2633.
35. Qiu Y L, Lee J, Bernasconi-Quadroni F, Soltis D E, Soltis P S, Zanis M, Zimmer E A, Chen Z, Savolainen V, Chase M W. The earliest angiosperms: Evidence from mitochondrial, plastid, and nuclear genomes. Nature 1999, 402:404-407.
36. Renner S S. Plant dispersal across the tropical Atlantic by wind and sea currents. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2004, 165:S23-S33.
37. Renner S S, Clausing G, Meyer K. Historical biogeography of Melastomataceae: The roles of Tertiary migration and long-distance dispersal. Am. J. Bot. 2001, 88:1290-1300.
38. Richardson J E, Pennington R T, Pennington T D, Hollingsworth P M. Rapid diversification of a species-rich genus of Neotropical rain forest trees. Science 2001, 293:2242-2245.
39. Ronquist F. 1996, ftp://ftp.uu.seftp://ftp.systbot.uu.se, DIVA version 1.1. Computer program and manual available by anonymous FTP from Uppsala University, or
40. Rzedowski J. Vegetación de México 1978, Limusa, México
41. Rzedowski J. Diversidad y orígenes de la flora fanerogámica de México. Acta Bot. Mex. 1991, 14:3-21.
42. Rzedowski J. Análisis preliminar de la flora vascular de los bosques mesófilos de montaña de México. Acta Bot. Mex. 1996, 35:25-44.
43. Sanderson M J. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: A penalized likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2002, 19:101-109.
44. Sokal R R, Rohlf F J. Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research 1994, Freeman, New York, New York
45. Soltis D E, Soltis P S, Endress P K, Chase M W. Phylogeny and evolution of angiosperms 2005, Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts
46. Soltis P S, Soltis D E, Chase M W. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 1999, 402:402-404.
47. Stevens P F. 2009, http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/, Angiosperm phylogeny website. Available at, (accessed February 2009)
48. Vamosi S M, Heard S B, Vamosi J C, Webb C O. Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18:572-592.
49. Velázquez A, Toledo V, Luna I. Cap. 15. Mexican temperate vegetation. North American terrestrial vegetation 2000, 573-592. Barbour M G, Billings W D, (Eds.), pp, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
50. Wang H, Moore M J, Soltis P S, Bell C D, Brockington S F, Alexandre R, Davis C C, Latvis M, Manchester S R, Soltis D E. Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:3853-3858.
51. Webb C O. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: An example for rain forest trees. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:145-155.
52. Webb C O, Ackerly D D, Mcpeek M A, Donoghue M J. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2002, 33:475-505.
53. Wiens J J. Global patterns of diversification and species richness in amphibians. Am. Nat. 2007, 170:S86-S106.
54. Wiens J J, Donoghue M J. Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:639-644.
55. Wiens J J, Graham C H, Moen D S, Smith S A, Reeder T W. Evolutionary and ecological causes of the latitudinal diversity gradient in hylid frogs: Treefrog trees unearth the roots of high tropical diversity. Am. Nat. 2006, 168:579-596.
56. WikstrÖm N, Savolainen V, Chase M W. Evolution of the angiosperms: Calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 2001, 268:2211-2220.
57. Williams D A. Improved likelihood ratio test for complete contingency tables. Biometrika 1976, 63:33-37.
58. Wolfe J A. Some aspects of plant geography of the Northern Hemisphere during the late Cretaceous and Tertiary. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 1975, 62:261-279.