The relationship between global and regional distribution diminishes among phylogenetically basal species

Evolution

Volumn 58, Issue 12, 2004, Pages 2622-2633

  Prinzing, Andreas ^a,c   Ozinga, Wim A ^a   Durka, Walter ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE RENNES 1   (France)

Author keywords

Extinction; Macroecology; Macroevolution; Occupancy; Phylogeny; Range size; Speciation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MACROECOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

CENTRAL EUROPE; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY; WORLD;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 11444250824     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01616.x     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 85:531-553.
2. Behrensmeyer, A. K., J. Damuth, W. DiMichele, R. Potts, H. D. Sues, and S. Wing. 1992. Terrestrial ecosystems through time. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago.
3. Benkert, D., F. Fukarek, and H. Korsch. 1998. Verbreitungsatlas der Farn- und Blütenpflanzen Ostdeutschlands. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.
4. Bennett, K. D. 1997. Evolution and ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
5. Benton, M. J. 1998. Molecular and morphological phylogenies of mammals: congruence with stratigraphic data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 9:398-407.
6. Bremer, B., and 26 others 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141:399-436.
7. Brown, J. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124:255-279.
8. _. 1995. Macroecology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
9. Brown, J. H., J. F. Gillooly, G. B. West, and V. M. Savage. 2003. The next step in macroecology: from general empirical patterns to universal ecological laws. Pp. 408-424 in T. M. Blackburn and K. J. Gaston, eds. Macroecology - concepts and consequences. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
10. Catalan, P., E. A. Kellogg, and R. G. Olmstead. 1997. Phylogeny of Poaceae subfamily Pooideae based on chloroplast ndhF gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 8:150-166.
11. Chase, M. W., and 41 others. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 80:528-580.
12. Cockburn, A. 1991. An introduction to evolutionary ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, U.K.
13. Cowley, M. J. R., C. D. Thomas, D. B. Roy, R. J. Wilson, J. L. León-Cortés, D. Guttiérrez, C. R. Bulman, R. M. Quinn, D. Moss, and K. J. Gaston. 2001. Density-dependent relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale. J. Anim. Ecol. 70:410-425.
14. Dierschke, H. 1994. Pflanzensoziologie. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
15. DiMichele, W. A. 1994. Ecological pattern in time and space. Paleobiology 20:89-92.
16. DiMichele, W. A., and R. M. Bateman. 1996. Plant paleoecology and evolutionary inference: two examples from the Paleozoic. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 90:223-247.
17. Dobzhansky, T. 1973. Nothing in biology makes sense, except in the light of evolution. Am. Biol. Teach. 35:125-129.
18. Downie, S. R., D. S. Katz-Downie, and M. F. Watson. 2000. A phylogeny of the flowering plant family Apiaceae based on chloroplast DNA rpl16 and rpoC1 intron sequences: towards a suprageneric classification of subfamily Apioideae. Am. J. Bot. 87:273-292.
19. Doyle, J. A. 1998. Phylogeny of vascular plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29:567-599.
20. Durka, W. 2002. Chromosomenzahlen, ploidiestufen und DNA-Gehalt. Pp. 57-63 in S. Klotz, I. Kühn, and W. Durka, eds. BIOLFLOR - eine datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen merkmalen zur flora von Deutschland. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn.
21. Earle, C. J. 2003. Gymnosperm database website. Available at http: //www.botanik.uni-bonn.de/conifers/index.htm.
22. Ellenberg, H. 1996. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer sieht. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
23. Farrell, B. D., and C. Mitter. 1993. Phylogenetic determinants of insect/plant community assembly. Pp. 253-266 in R. Ricklefs and D. Schluter, eds. Species diversity in ecological communities. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
24. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
25. Frank, D., and S. Klotz. 1990. Biologisch-ökologische daten zur flora der DDR. 2d ed. Wissensch. Beitr. Martin-Luther-Univ. Halle-Wittenb. 32:1-167.
26. Futuyma, D. J. 1983. Selective factors in the evolution of host choice by phytophagous insects. Pp. 227-244 in S. Ahmad, ed. Herbivorous insects: host-seeking behavior and mechanisms. Academic Press, New York.
27. Gaston, K. J. 1998. Species-range size distributions: products of speciation, extinction and transformation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353:219-230.
28. Gaston, K. J., and T. M. Blackburn. 1997. Age, area and avian diversification. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 62:239-253.
29. Gaston, K. J., T. M. Blackburn, J. J. D. Greenwood, R. D. Gregory, R. M. Quinn, and J. H. Lawton. 2000. Abundance-occupancy relationships. J. Appl. Ecol. 37:39-59.
30. Good, R. 1974. The geography of the flowering plants. Longman, London.
31. Grabherr, G., G. Koch, H. Kirchmeir, and K. Reiter. 1995. Hemerobie österreichischer Waldökosysteme - vorstellung eines forschungsvorhabens im rahmen des österreichischen beitrages zum MAB-Programm der UNESCO. Zeitschr. Ökol. Natursch. 4:105-110.
32. Graham, S. W., and R. G. Olmstead. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 87:1712-1730.
33. Gregory, R. D., and T. M. Blackburn. 1998. Macroecological patterns in British breeding birds: covariation of species' geographical range size at different spatial scales. Ecography 21:527-534.
34. Grime, J. P., J. G. Hodgson, and R. Hunt. 1988. Comparative plant ecology: a functional approach to common British species. Unwin Hyman, London.
35. Gurevitch, J., and L. V. Hedges. 1999. Statistical issues in ecological meta-analyses. Ecology 80:1142-1149.
36. Harte, J., T. Blackburn, and A. Ostling. 2001. Self-similarity and the relationship between abundance and range size. Am. Nat. 157:374-386.
37. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
38. Haynes, R. R., D. H. Les, and L. B. Holm-Nielsen. 1998. Potamogetonaceae. Pp. 408-415 in Kubitzki, K., ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. IV. Flowering plants. Monocotyledones. Alismatanae and Commelinanae (except Gramineae). Springer, Berlin.
39. Hengeveld, R. 1990. Dynamic biogeography. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
40. Hodgson, J. G. 1986. Commonness and rarity in plants with special reference to the Sheffield flora. Part III. Taxonomic and evolutionary aspects. Biol. Conserv. 36:275-296.
41. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
42. Jablonski, D. 1994. Extinctions in the fossil record. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 344:11-17.
43. Jablonski, D., and J. W. Valentine. 1990. From regional to total geographic ranges: testing the relationship in Recent bivalves. Paleobiology 16:126-142.
44. Jablonski, D., K. Roy, and J. W. Valentine. 2003. Evolutionary macroecology and the fossil record. Pp 368-390 in T. M. Blackburn and K. J. Gaston, eds. Macroecology - concepts and consequences. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
45. Jansson, R., and M. Dynesius. 2002. The fate of clades in a world of recurrent climatic change - Milankovitch oscillations and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:741-778.
46. Johnson, C. N. 1998. Species extinctions and the relationship between distribution and abundance. Nature 394:272-274.
47. Kemp, T. S. 1999. Fossils and evolution. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
48. Klotz, S. 1984. Phytoökoloische beiträge zur charakterisierung und gliederung urbaner ökosysteme, dargestellt am beispiel der städte Halle und Halle-Neustadt. Ph.D. thesis, University of Halle, Germany.
49. Kubitzki, K. 1998. Systematics and evolution. Pp. 23-34 in K. Kubitzki. ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. III. Flowering plants. Monocotyledones. Lilianae (except Orchidaceae). Springer, Berlin.
50. Kühn, I., and S. Klotz. 2002. Angaben zu den arealen. Pp. 227-240 in S. Klotz, I. Kühn, and W. Durka, eds. BIOLFLOR - eine datenbank mit biologisch-ökologischen merkmalen zur flora von Deutschland. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn.
51. Kunick, W. 1974. Veränderung von flora und vegetation einer Grosstadt, dargestellt am beispiel von Berlin, (West). Ph.D. thesis, Free University of Berlin, Germany.
52. Lang, G. 1994. Quartäre vegetationsgeschichte Europas. Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany.
53. Latham, R. E. and R. E. Ricklefs. 1993. Global patterns of tree species richness in moist forests - energy-diversity theory does not account for variation in species richness. Oikos 67:325-333.
54. Lawton, J. H. 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84: 177-192.
55. Levin, D. A. 2000. The origin, expansion, and demise of plant species. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
56. Löve, A., and D. Löve. 1949. The geobotanical significance of polyploidy. I. Polyploidy and latitude. Port. Acta Biol. Ser. A, Special Vol. R. B. Goldschmidt: 273-352.
57. MacNally, R. C. 1995. Ecological versatility and community ecology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
58. Magallon, S., and M. J. Sanderson. 2001. Absolute diversification rates in angiosperm clades. Evolution 55:1762-1780.
59. Meusel, H., and E. J. Jäger. 1992. Vergleichende chorologie der zentraleuropäischen flora. Band III (Text). Fischer, Jena, Germany.
60. Morgan, D. R., D. E. Soltis, and K. R. Robertson. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Am. J. Bot. 81:890-903.
61. Murray, B. R., and C. R. Dickman. 2000. Relationships between body size and geographical range size among Australian mammals: Has human impact distorted macroecological patterns? Ecography 23:92-100.
62. Nee, S., A. F. Read, J. J. D. Greenwood, and P. H. Harvey. 1991. The relationship between abundance and body size in British birds. Nature 351:312-313.
63. Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. H. Kutner. 1985. Applied linear statistical models. 2d ed. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
64. Norell, M. A. 1995. Phylogeny and stratigraphy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:36-37.
65. Olmstead, R. G., and P. A. Reeves. 1995. Evidence for the polyphyly of the Scrophulariaceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 82:176-193.
66. Olmstead, R. G., C. W. dePamphilis, A. D. Wolfe, N. D. Young, W. J. Elisons, and P. A. Reeves. 2001. Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae. Am. J. Bot. 88:348-361.
67. Oxelman, B., M. Backlund, and B. Bremer. 1999. Relationships of the Buddlejaceae s.l. investigated using parsimony jackknife and branch support analysis of chloroplast ndhF and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 24:164-182.
68. Pagel, M. 1997. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scripta 26:331-348.
69. Pärtel, M. 2002. Local plant diversity patterns and evolutionary history at the regional scale. Ecology 83:2361-2366.
70. Prinzing, A., W. Durka, S. Klotz, and R. Brandi. 2001. The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:2383-2389.
71. _. 2002. Which species become aliens? Evol. Ecol. Res. 4: 385-405.
72. Pryer, K. M., A. R. Smith, and J. E. Skog. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships of extant ferns based on evidence from morphology and rbcL sequences. Am. Fern J. 85:205-282.
73. Pyšek, P., K. Prach, and P. Šmilauer. 1995. Relating invasion success to plant traits: an analysis of the Czech alien flora. Pp. 39-60 in P. Pyšek, K. Prach, M. Rejmánek, and M. Wade, eds. Plant invasion - general aspects and special problems. Academic Publishing, Amsterdam.
74. Reichard, S. H., and C. W. Hamilton. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv. Biol. 11:193-203.
75. Richardson, D. M., N. Allsopp, C. M. D'Antonio, S. J. Milton, and M. Rejmánek. 2000. Plant invasions - the role of mutualism. Biol. Rev. 75:65-93.
76. Ricklefs, R. E. 2003. Global diversification rates of passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:2285-2291.
77. Ricklefs, R. E., and E. Bermingham. 2002. The concept of the taxon cycle in biogeography. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 11:353-361.
78. Ricklefs, R. E., and S. S. Renner. 1994. Species richness within families of flowering plants. Evolution 48:1619-1636.
79. Rosenthal, R. 1984. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
80. Savolainen, V., M. F. Fay, D. C. Albach, A. Backlund, M. van der Bank, K. M. Cameron, S. A. Johnson, M. D. Lledo, J. C. Pintaud, M. Powell, M. C. Sheahan, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, P. Weston, W. M. Whitten, K. J. Wurdack, and M. W. Chase. 2000. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bull. 55:257-309.
81. Schubert, R., K. Werner, and H. Meusel. 1990. Exkursionsflora von Deutschland. Vol. 2. Volk und Wissen. Verlag, Berlin.
82. Schubert, R., W. Hilbig, and S. Klotz. 2001. Bestimmungsbuch der pflanzengesellschaften Deutschlands. Spektrum-Verlag, Heidelberg.
83. Schuster, R. M. 1976. Plate tectonics and its bearing on the geographical distribution of Angiosperms. Pp. 48-138 in C. B. Beck, ed. Origin and early evolution of angiosperms. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
84. Sims, H. J., and K. J. McConway. 2003. Nonstochastic variation of species-level diversification rates within angiosperms. Evolution 57:460-479.
85. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981 Biometry, 2d. ed. Freeman, New York.
86. Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution, pattern and process. Freeman, New York.
87. Statsoft Inc. 1999. STATISTICA for Windows. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK.
88. Stebbins, G. L. 1985. Polyploidy, hybridization, and the invasion of new habitats. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:824-832.
89. Stebbins, G. L., and J. C. Dawe. 1987. Polyploidy and distribution in the European flora: a reappraisal. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 108: 343-354.
90. Stevens, P. F. 2001. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Ver. 5, May 2004: Available via http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/.
91. Taylor, C. M., and N. J. Gotelli. 1994. The macroecology of Cyprinella - correlates of phylogeny, body-size, and geographic range. Am. Nat. 144:549-569.
92. Thompson, K., K. J. Gaston, and S. R. Band. 1999. Range size, dispersal and niche breadth in the herbaceous flora of central England. J. Ecol. 87:150-155.
93. Valentine, J. W. 1967. The influence of climatic fluctuations on species diversity within the tethyan provincial system. Pp. 153-166 in C. G. Adams and D. V. Ager, eds. Aspects of tethyan biogeography. Systematics Association, London.
94. Vermeij, G. J. 1978. Adaptation and biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
95. _. 1987. Evolution and escalation. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
96. Walter, H. 1990. Vegetation und Klimazonen. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
97. Webb, C. O., D. D. Ackerly, M. A. McPeek, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33:475-505.
98. Webb, T. J., and K. J. Gaston. 2003. On the heritability of geographic range sizes. Am. Nat. 161:553-566.
99. Willis, J. C. 1922. Age and area: a study in geographical distribution and origin of species. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
100. Wisskirchen, R., and H. Haeupler. 1998. Standardliste der Farnund Blütenpflanzen Deutschlands. Ulmer, Stuttgart.
101. Wolfe, A. D., and C. W. dePamphilis. 1998. The effect of relaxed functional constraints on the photosynthetic gene rbcL in photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic parasitic plants. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1243-1258.