The seventeen theoretical constructs of information searching and information retrieval

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 61, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1517-1534

  Jansen, Bernard J ^a   Rieh, Soo Young ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROSS-CUTTING; EVALUATION METRICS; FOUNDATIONAL ELEMENTS; INFORMATION SEARCHING;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

INFORMATION USE;

EID: 77954994540     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21358     Document Type: Article

References (169)

1. Ackoff, R.L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3-9.
2. Austin, B. (2001). Mooers' law: In and out of context. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(8), 607-609.
3. Baeza-Yates, R., Caldefon-Benavides, L., & Gonzalez, C. (2006, October). In F. Crestani, P. Ferragina, & M. Sanderon (Eds.), The intention behind web queries. In Proceedings of the Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4209, 98-109.
4. Bates, M.J. (1990). Where should the person stop and the information search interface start? Information Processing & Management, 26(5), 575-591.
5. Bates, M.J. (2005). An introduction to metatheories, theories, and models. In K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L.E.F. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 1.-24). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
6. Bawden, D. (2008). Smoother pebbles and the shoulders of giants : The developing foundations of information science. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 415-426.
7. Belkin, N., Cool, C., Stein, A., & Thiel, S. (1995). Cases, scripts, and information-seeking strategies: On the design of interactive information retrieval systems. Expert Systems With Applications, 9(3), 379-395.
8. Belkin, N., Oddy, R., & Brooks, H. (1982). ASK for information retrieval, Parts 1 & 2. Journal of Documentation, 38(2), 61-71, 145-164.
9. Belkin, N., & Vickery, A. (1985). Interaction in information systems. Wetherby, United Kingdom: British Library.
10. Belkin, NJ. (1990). The cognitive viewpoint in information science. Journal of Information Science, 16(1), 11-16.
11. Belkin, N.J. (1993). Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. In G. Knorz, J. Krause, & C. WomserHacker (Eds.), Information retrieval '93. Von der modellierung zur anwendung (pp. 55-66). Konstanz, Germany: Universitaetsverlag Konstanz.
12. Belkin, N.J., & Robertson, S.E. (1976). Information science and the phenomenon of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 27(4), 197-204.
13. Berryman, J.M. (2008). Judgements during information seeking: A naturalistic approach to understanding the assessment of enough information. Journal of Information Science, 34(2), 196-206.
14. Bierbaum, E.G. (1990). A paradigm for the '90s: In research and practice, library and information science needs a unifying principle; "Least effort" is one scholar's suggestion. American Libraries, 21, 18-19.
15. Blair, D.C., & Maron, M.E. (1985). An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document retrieval system. Communications of the ACM, 20(1), 289-299.
16. Borko, H. (1983). Information and knowledge worker productivity. Information Processing & Management, 19(4), 203-212.
17. Borlund, P. (2003). The concept of relevance in information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54( 10), 913-925.
18. Boyce, B.R., & Kraft, D.H. (1985). Principles and theories in information science. In M.E. Williams (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 20, pp. 153-178). White Plains, NY: Knowledge Industry.
19. Brookes, B.C. (1980a). The foundations of information science: Part I. Philosophical aspects. Journal of Information Science, 2(3-4), 125-133.
20. Brookes, B.C. (1980b). The foundations of information science: Part II. Quantitative aspects: Classes of things and the challenge of human individuality. Journal of Information Science, 2(5), 209-221.
21. Brookes, B.C. (1980c). The foundations of information science: Part III. Quantitative aspects: Objective maps and subjective landscapes. Journal of Information Science, 2(6), 269-275.
22. Brookes, B.C. ( 1981). The foundations of information science: Part IV. Information science: The changing paradigm. Journal of Information Science, 3(1), 3-12.
23. Brown, J.S., & Duguid, P. (2002). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
24. Bruner, J.S., & Potter, M.C. (1964). Interference in visual recognition. Science, 144(3617), 424-425.
25. Buckland, M. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(5), 351-360.
26. Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176, 101-108.
27. Byström, K., & Järvelin, K. (1995). Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, 31 (2), 191-213.
28. Callan, J.P., & Croft, W.B. (1993). In R. Korfhage, E. Rasmussen, & P. Willett (Eds.), An evaluation of query processing strategies using the tipster collection. In Proceedings of the 16th annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 347-355). New York: ACM Press.
29. Capurro, R., & Hjørland, B. (2003). The concept of information. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 37, pp. 343-411). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
30. Case, D.O. (2007). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press.
31. Case, D.O., & Johnson, D. (2005). Avoiding versus seeking: The relationship of information seeking to avoidance, blunting, coping, dissonance, and related concepts. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(3), 353-362.
32. Choo, C., & Turnbull, D. (2000). Information seeking on the web: An integrated model of browsing and searching. First Monday, 5(2). Retrieved April 27, 2010, from, http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue5-2/choo/index.html
33. Conole, G., & Dyke, M. (2004). What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J Research in Learning Technology 12(2), 113-124.
34. Couvering, E.V. (2004, July). New media? The political economy of internet search engines. Paper presented at the 2004 Conference of the International Association of Media & Communications Researchers, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
35. Crestani, F., & Wu, S. (2006). Testing the cluster hypothesis in distributed information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 42(5), 1137-1150.
36. Croft, W.B. (1986). Boolean queries and term dependencies in probabilistic retrieval models. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(2), 71-77.
37. Croft, W.B., & Thompson, R.H. (1987). 13: A new approach to the design of document retrieval systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(6), 389-404.
38. DePoy, E., & Gitlin, L.N. (1998). Theory in research (2nd ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
39. Dervin, B. (1976). Strategies for dealing with human information needs: Information or communication? Journal of Broadcasting, 20(3), 324-351.
40. Dervin, B. (1998). Sense-making theory and practice: An overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2(2), 36-46.
41. Easley, D., & O'hara, M. (2001). Information and the cost of capital. Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1553-1583.
42. Efthimiadis, E.N., & Robertson, S.E. (1989). Feedback and interaction in information retrieval, In C. Oppenheim (Ed.), Perspectives in information management (pp. 257-272). London: Butterworths.
43. Eliot, T.S. (1934). The rock. London: Faber & Faber.
44. Ellis, C., & Gibbs, S. (1989). Concurrency control in groupware systems. In J. Clifford, B. Lindsay, & D. Maier (Eds.), Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 399-407). New York: ACM Press.
45. Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural model for information retrieval system design. Journal of Information Science, 15(4/5), 237-247.
46. Ellis, D., & Haugan, M. (1997). Modeling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 384-403.
47. Feldman, M.S., & March, J.G. (1981). Information in organizations as signal and symbol. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), 171-186.
48. Fetterly, D. (2007). Adversarial information retrieval: The manipulation of web content. Retrieved April. 27, 2010, from http://www.reviews.com/- hottopic/hottopic-essay-06.cfm
49. Fidel, R., & Green, M. (2004). The many faces of accessibility: Engineers' perception of information sources. Information Processing & Management, 40(3), 563-581.
50. Fisher, K., & Julien, H. (2009). Information behavior. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science & technology (Vol. 43, pp. 317-358). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
51. Fogg, B.J. (2002). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco: Kaufmann.
52. Fortunato, S., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., & Vespignani, A. (2008). Topical interests and the mitigation of search engine bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103 (34), 12684-12689.
53. Frants, V.I., &,Brush, C.B. (1986). The need for information and some aspects of information retrieval systems construction. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39(2), 86-91.
54. Fuhr, N. (2008). A probability ranking principle for interactive information retrieval. Information Retrieval, 11(3), 251-265.
55. Gauch, S., Wang, G., & Gomez, M. (1996). Profusion: Intelligent fusion from multiple, distributed search engines. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 2(9), 637-649.
56. Gerhart, S.L. (2004). Do web search engines suppress controversy? First Monday, 9(1). Retrieved April 27, 2010, from, http://firstmonday.org/issues/ issue9-1/gerhart/index.html
57. Gerstberger, P.G., & Allen, T.J. (1968). Criteria used by research and development engineers in the selection of an information source. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(4), 272-279.
58. Gillard, S., & Johansen, J. (2004). Project management communication: A systems approach. Journal of Information Science, 30(1), 23-29.
59. Goldman, E. (2006). Search engine bias and the demise of search engine utopianism. In A. Spink & M. Zimmerman (Eds.), Web search: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 121-134). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
60. Hall, H. (2001). Input-friendliness: Motivating knowledge sharing across intranets. Journal of Information Science, 27(3), 139-146.
61. Hardy, A.P. (1982). The selection of channels when seeking information: Cost/benefit vs least-effort. Information Processing & Management, 18(6), 289-293.
62. Harris, R.M., & Dewdney, P. (1994). Barriers to information: How formal help systems fail battered women. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
63. Hart, M.H. (1992). The 100: A ranking of the most influential persons in history. New York: Citadel Press.
64. Hertzum, M. (2002). The importance of trust in software engineers' assessment and choice of information sources. Information and Organization, 12(1), 1-18.
65. Hertzum, M., & Pejtersen, A.M. (2000). The information-seeking practices of engineers: Searching for documents as well as for people. Information Processing & Management, 36(5), 761-778.
66. Heylighen, F. (1999). The necessity of theoretical constructs. Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission (Vol. 3).
67. Hider, P. (2006). Search goal revision in models of information retrieval. Journal of Information Science, 32(4), 352-361.
68. Hjørland, B. (1998). Theory and meta-theory of information science: A new interpretation. Journal of Documentation, 54(5), 606-621,
69. Hjørland, B., & Albrechtsen, H. (1995). Toward a new horizon in information science: Domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 46(6), 400-425.
70. Ingwersen, P. (1992). Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham.
71. Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive perspectives of information retrieval interaction: Elements of a cognitive IR theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3-50.
72. Ingwersen, P., & Järvelin, K. (2005). The turn. Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
73. Introna, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Defining the web: The politics of search engines. IEEE Computer, 33(January), 54-62.
74. Israel, D., & Perry, J. (1990). What is information? In P. Hanson (Ed.), Information, language and cognition (pp. 1-19). Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia Press.
75. Jansen, B.J., & McNeese, M.D. (2005). Evaluating the effectiveness of and patterns of interactions with automated searching assistance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(14), 1480-1503.
76. Jansen, BJ., & Spink, A. (2005). How are we searching the world wide web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing & Management, 42(1), 248-263.
77. Jansen, BJ., Taksa, I., & Spink, A. (2008). Research and methodological foundations of transaction log analysis. In B J. Jansen, A. Spink, & I. Taksa (Eds.), Handbook of research on web log analysis (pp. 1-17). Hershey, PA: IGI.
78. Jardine, N., & van Rijsbergen, C.J. (1971). The use of hierarchic clustering in information retrieval. Information Storage and Retrieval, 7(1), 217-240.
79. Joachims, T (2002). In D. Hand, D. Keim, & R. Ng (Eds.), Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 133-142). New York: ACM Press.
80. Kari, J. (2007). Conceptualizing the personal outcomes of information. Information Research, 12(2), Paper No. 292. Retrieved April 27, 2010, from http://InformationR.net/ir/212-292/paper292.html
81. Kelly, D., & Teevan, J. (2003). Implicit feedback for inferring user preference: A bibliography. SIGIR Forum, 37(2), 18-28.
82. Klein, G., Moon, B., & Hoffman, R.F. (2006). Making sense of sensemaking 2: A macrocognitive model. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21(5), 88-92.
83. Kochen, M. (1984). Information science research: The search for the nature of information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 35(3), 194-199.
84. Koenig, M.E.D. (1987). The convergence of Moore's/Mooers' laws. Information Processing & Management, 23(6), 583-592.
85. Konow, J. (2005). Blind spots: The effects of information and stakes on fairness bias and dispersion. Social Justice Research, 18(4), 349-390.
86. Korfhage, R. (1997). Information storage and retrieval. New York: Wiley.
87. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1988). Developing a model of the library search process: Cognitive and affective aspects. Reference Quarterly, 28, 232-242.
88. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1989). The information search process of high-middlelow achieving high school seniors. School Library Media Quarterly, 17, 224-228.
89. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371.
90. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1993). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49, 339-355.
91. Lalmas, M., & Ruthven, I. (1999, May). In H. Jaakkola, H. Kangassalo, & E. Kawaguchi (Eds.), A framework for investigating the interaction in information retrieval. In Proceedings of the Ninth EuropeanJapanese Conferences on Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases (pp. 222-239). Amsterdam.: IOS Press.
92. Landry, B.C., & Rush, J.E. (1970). Toward a theory of indexing - ii. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 21 (3), 358-367.
93. Lin, S.-J. (2002, August). Design space of personalized indexing: Enhancing successive web searching for transmuting information problems (pp. 1092-1100). In Proceedings of the Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1092-1100). Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems.
94. Lynch, M.F. (1977). Variety generation-A reinterpretation of Shannon's mathematical theory of communication, and its implications for information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28(1), 19-25.
95. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
96. Marchionini, G. (1992). Interfaces for end-user information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(2), 156.
97. Marchionini, G. (1995). Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
98. Marin, J., & Poulter, A. (2004). Dissemination of competitive intelligence. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 165-180.
99. Maron, M.E., & Kuhns, J.L. (1960). On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval. Journal of the ACM, 7(3), 216-244.
100. McDonald, D.W., & Ackerman, M.S. (1998). Just talk to me: A field study ofexpertise location. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 315-324). New York: ACM Press.
101. Meadow, C.T., & Yuan, W. (1997). Measuring the impact of information: Defining the concepts. Information Processing & Management, 33(6), 697-714.
102. Meadows, A.J. (1990). Theory in information science. Journal of Information Science, 16(1), 59-63.
103. Merton, R.K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894-904.
104. Milewski, A.E. (2007). Global and task effects in information-seeking among software engineers. Empirical Software Engineer, 12(2), 311-326.
105. Mizzaro, S. (1997). Relevance: The whole history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(9), 810-832.
106. Mooers, C.N. (1960). Mooers' law; or why some retrieval systems are used and others are not. American Documentation, 11(3), ii.
107. Mooers, C.N. (1996). Mooers' law; or why some retrieval systems are used and others are not. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 23(1), 22-23. (Reprinted from American Documentation, 11(3), ii).
108. Oard, D., & Kim, J. (2001) Modeling information content using observable behavior. In TB. Hahn (Ed.), Proceedings of the 64th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (pp. 38-45). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
109. Oppenheim, C., Stenson, J., & Wilson, R.M.S. (2003). Studies on information as an asset: I. Definitions. Journal of Information Science, 29(3), 159-166.
110. Oskamp, S. (1965). Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29(1), 261-265.
111. Pemberton, J.M. (1989). Telecommunication: Technology and devices. Records Management Quarterly, 23, 46-48.
112. Peterson, R.A., Balasubramanian, S., & Bronnenberg, B.J. (1997). Exploring the implications of the internet for consumer marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 329-346.
113. Pettigrew, K.E., & McKechnie, L. (2001). The use of theory in information science research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(1), 62-73.
114. Pirolli, P. (2007). Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with information. Oxford, United Kingdom.: Oxford University Press.
115. Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Vintage.
116. Repo, A.J. (1989). The value of information: Approaches in economics, accounting, and management science. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 40(2), 68-85.
117. Robertson, S. (1977). Theories and models in information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 33, 126-148.
118. Robertson, S. (2000). On theoretical argument in information retrieval. ACM SIGIR Forum, 34(1), 1-10.
119. Robertson, S.E. (2004). Understanding inverse document frequency: On theoretical arguments for idf. Journal of Documentation, 60(5), 503-520.
120. Rocchio, J.J. (1971). Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In G. Salton (Ed.), The smart retrieval system (pp. 313-323). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
121. Rosenberg, V. ( 1974). The scientific premises of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 25(4), 263-269.
122. Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180.
123. Russell, D.M., Stefik, MJ., Pirolli, P., & Card, S.K. (1993). In B. Arnold, G.v.d. Veer, & T. White (Eds.), The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proceedings of the INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 Conferences on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 269-276). New York: ACM Press.
124. Ruthven, I. (2008). Interactive information retrieval. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology (Vol. 42, pp. 43-92). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
125. Ryker, R., Nath, R., & Henson, J. (1997). Determinants of computer user expectations and their relationships with user satisfaction: An empirical study. Information Processing & Management, 33(2), 529-537.
126. Salton, G. (1987). Historical note: The past thirty years in information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38(5), 375-380.
127. Salton, G., & McGill, M.J. (1983). Introduction to modern information retrieval. New York: McGraw-Hill.
128. Sanderson, M. ( 1994) Word sense disambiguation and information retrieval. In W.B. Croft & C.J. van Rijsbergen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 142-151). New York: ACM Press.
129. Saracevic, T (1975). Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26(6), 321-343.
130. Saracevic, T. (1997a, November). In C Schwartz & M. Rorvig (Eds.), Extension and application of the stratified model of information retrieval interaction. In Proceedings of the 60th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science (Vol. 34, pp. 313-327). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
131. Saracevic, T. (1997b). Users lost: Reflections on the past, future, and limits of information science. SIGIR Forum, 31(2), 16-27.
132. Saracevic, T (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 1051-1063.
133. Saracevic, T. (2007a). Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science: Part ii. Nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(3), 1915-1933.
134. Saracevic, T (2007b). Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science: Part iii. Behavior and effects of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(3), 2126-2144.
135. Sawyer, S., & Huang, H. (2007). Conceptualizing information, technology, and people: Comparing information science and information systems literatures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(10), 1436-1447.
136. Schamber, L., Eisenberg, M.B., & Nilan, M.S. (1990). A re-examination of relevance: Toward a dynamic, situational definition. Information Processing & Management, 26(6), 755-776.
137. Schmidt, J.B., & Spreng, R.A. (1996). A proposed model of external consumer information search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(3), 246-256.
138. Schrader, A.M. (1986). The domain of information science: Problems in conceptualization and in consensus-building. Information Services & Use, 6, 169-205.
139. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(July/October), 379-423, 623-656.
140. Shen, X., Tin, B., & Zhai, C. (2005). Context-sensitive information retrieval using implicit feedback. In R. Baeza-Yates & N. Ziviani (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th annual. International ACM. SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 43-50). New York: ACM Press.
141. Simon, H. (1981). The sciences of the artificial (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
142. Spärck Jones, K. (1972). A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 28(1), 11-21.
143. Spink, A. (2004). Multitasking information behavior and information task switching: An exploratory study. Journal of Documentation, 60(3), 336-345.
144. Spink, A., Wilson, T., Ellis, D., & Ford, F. (1998, April). Modeling users' successive searches in digital environments. D-Lib Magazine.
145. Stephens, D.W. (1989). Variance and the value of information. The American Naturalist, 134(1), 128-140.
146. Summit, R.K. (1993). The year 2000: Dreams and nightmares. Searcher, 1, 16-17.
147. Talja, S. (2005). The domain analytic approach to scholars' information practices. In K. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & L. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior: A researcher's guide (pp. 123-127). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
148. Taylor, R.S. (1968). Question negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries, 29, 178-194.
149. Tenner, E. (1996). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: Vintage Books.
150. Teskey, F.N. (1989). User models and world models for data, information, and knowledge. Information Processing & Management, 25(1), 7-14.
151. Thow-Yick, L. (1994). The basic entity model: A fundamental theoretical model of information and information processing. Information Processing & Management, 30(5), 647-661.
152. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
153. Vakkari, P. (1998). Growth of theories on information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 34(3/4), 361-382.
154. Vakkari, P. (1999). Tisk complexity, problem structure, and information actions: Integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 35, 819-837.
155. Vakkari, P. (2001). A theory of the task-based information retrieval process. Journal of Documentation, 57(1), 44-60.
156. van Rijsbergen, C.J. (1970). A clustering algorithm. Computer Journal, 13(1), 113-115.
157. van Rijsbergen, C.J. (1979). Information retrieval (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths.
158. van Rijsbergen, C.J. (1986). A new theoretical framework for information retrieval ACM SIGIR Forum, 21(1-2), 23-29.
159. van Rijsbergen, C.J. (2004). The geometry of information retrieval. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
160. Wagner, E.D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 6-29.
161. Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: An inquiry into cognitive authority. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
162. Wilson, K.G. (2001). Some notes on theoretical constructs: Types and validation from a contextual behavioral perspective. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1(2), 205-215.
163. Wilson, T.D. (1999). Models in information behaviour research. Journal of Documentation, 55(3), 249-270.
164. Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55.
165. Wilson, T.D. (2008). The information user: Past, present and future. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 457-464.
166. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Addison-Wesley.
167. Xie, I. (2008). Interactive information retrieval in digital environments. Hershey, PA: IGI.
168. Xie, I., & Cool, C. (2009). Understanding help-seeking within the context of searching digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 477-494.
169. Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.