Leading learning through assessment for learning?

School Leadership and Management

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 285-300

  Boyle, William Francis ^a   Charles, Marie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b PEARSON   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment; educational change; learning; pedagogy; school improvement

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954989485     PISSN: 13632434     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2010.485184     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Alexander, R. 2005. Culture, dialogue and learning: Notes on an emerging pedagogy. Paper presented at International Association for Cognitive Education and Psychology Conference, July, in Durham, UK.
2. Allal, L., and M. Lopez. 2005. Formative assessment of learning: A review of publications in French. Paris: OECD.
3. Assessment Reform Group. 2002. Assessment for learning: 10 principles. London: Author.
4. Assessment Reform Group. 2007. The role of teachers in the assessment of learning. London: Author.
5. Audibert, S. 1980. En d'autres mots . . . l'evaluation des apprentissages. Mesure et Evaluation en Education 3: 59-64.
6. Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1988. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. London: Kings College.
7. Boyle, B. 2008. Holistic assessment: A model without status in the assessment hierarchy in England. Paper delivered at an International Colloquium on holistic assessment, May 4-7, in Kuching, Malaysia.
8. Boyle, B., and J. Bragg. 2006. A curriculum without foundation. British Educational Research Journal 32, no. 4: 569-82.
9. Brown, M., M. Askew, D. Baker, H. Denvor, and A. Millett. 1998. Is the National Numeracy Strategy research based? British Journal of Educational Studies 46, no. 4: 362-85.
10. Christie, T., and B. Boyle. 1990. A guide to Teacher Assessment Packs A, B & C. London: Heinemann.
11. Crooks, T.J. 1988. The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research 58, no. 4: 438-81.
12. Dadds, M. 2001. The politics of pedagogy. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 7, no. 1: 43-58.
13. Dearing, R. 1994. The National Curriculum and its assessment. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
14. Department for Education and Employment. 1998. The implementation of the National Numeracy Strategy: The final report of the numeracy task force. London: DfEE.
15. Department of Education and Science. 1988a. Education Reform Act. London: HMSO.
16. Department of Education and Science. 1988b. Task Group on Assessment and Testing - National Curriculum: A report. London: Department of Education and Skills.
17. Department for Education and Skills. 2003. Excellence and enjoyment; A strategy for primary schools. London: DfES.
18. Fresch, M.J. 2007. Teachers' concerns about spelling instruction: A national survey. Reading Psychology 28, no. 4: 301-30.
19. Graziano, K.J. 2008. Walk the talk: Connecting critical pedagogy and practice in teacher education. Teaching Education 19, no. 2: 153-63.
20. Hall, K., J. Collins, S. Benjamin, M. Nind, and K. Sheehy. 2004. SATurated models of pupildom: Assessment and inclusion/exclusion. British Educational Research Journal 30, no. 6: 801-17.
21. Hall, K., and A. Harding. 2002. Level descriptions and teacher assessment in England: Towards a community of practice. Educational Research 44, no. 1: 1-15.
22. Harlen, W., and M. James. 1997. Assessment and learning: Differences and relationships between formative and summative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 4, no. 3: 365-79.
23. Klenowski, V. 1995. Student self-evaluation processes in student-centred teaching and learning contexts of Australia and England. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 2, no. 2: 145-63.
24. Myhill, D. 2006. Talk, talk, talk: Teaching and learning in whole class discourse. Research Papers in Education 21, no. 1: 19-41.
25. Patrick, F., C. Forde, and A. McPhee. 2003. Challenging the 'New Professionalism': From managerialism to pedagogy? Journal of In-service Education 29, no. 2: 237-53.
26. Perrenoud, P. 1991. Towards a pragmatic approach to formative evaluation. In Assessment of pupils' achievement: Motivation and school success, ed. P. Weston, 79-101. Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.
27. Perrenoud, P. 1998. From a formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 5, no. 1: 85-102.
28. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). n.d. Assessing primary progress. assessment@qca.org.uk.
29. Ramprasad, A. 1983. On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science 28, no. 1: 4-13.
30. Reeves, D., B. Boyle, and T. Christie. 2001. The relationship between teacher assessments and pupil attainments in standard tests/tasks at Key Stage 2, 1996-98. British Educational Research Journal 27, no. 2: 141-60.
31. Sadler, D.R. 1989. Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
32. Sadler, D.R. 1998. Formative assessment: Revising the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 5, no. 1: 77-84.
33. Scriven, M. 1967. The methodology of evaluation. American Education Research Association Monograph Series on Evaluation 1: 39-83.
34. Simon, B. 1981. Why no pedagogy in England? In Education in the eighties: The central issues, ed. B. Simon and W. Taylor, 124-45. London: Batsford.
35. Vygotsky. L.S. 1986. Thought and language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Wiliam, D., C. Lee, C. Harrison, and P. Black. 2004. Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 11, no. 1: 49-65.