Targeted funding for educationally disadvantaged students: A regression discontinuity estimate of the impact on high school student achievement

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 183-204

  Henry, Gary T ^a   Fortner, C Kevin ^a   Thompson, Charles L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b EAST CAROLINA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disadvantaged students; Education funding; High schools; Regression discontinuity

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954943222     PISSN: 01623737     EISSN: 19351062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0162373710370620     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Barrow, L., & Rouse, C.E. (2005). Causality, causality, causality: The view of education inputs and outputs from economics (Working Paper 2005-15). Chicago, IL: Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=869440.
2. Boozer, M., & Rouse, C. (2001). Intraschool variation in class size: Patterns and implications. Journal of Urban Economics, 50(1), 163-189.
3. Cook, T. (2008). Waiting for life to arrive: A history of the regression-discontinuity design in psychology, statistics, and economics. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 636-654.
4. Cook, T.D., Shadish, W.R., & Wong, V.C. (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27(4), 724-750.
5. Dee, T.S., & Levine, J. (2004). The fate of new funding: Evidence from Massachusetts' education finance reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 199-215.
6. Diaz, J.J., & Handa, S. (2005). An assessment of propensity score matching as a nonexperimental impact estimator: Evidence from Mexico's PROGRESA program. Journal of Human Resources, 41(2), 319-345.
7. Glazerman, S., Levy, D.M., & Myers, D. (2003). Nonexperimental versus experimental estimates of earnings impacts. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589(1), 63-93.
8. Goldberger, A.S. (1972). Selection bias in evaluating treatment effects: some formal illustrations. Unpublished manuscript.
9. Gormley, W.T., Jr., & Gayer, T. (2005). Promoting school readiness in Oklahoma: An evaluation of Tulsa's pre-K program. Journal of Human Resources, 40(3), 533-558.
10. Gormley, W.T., Jr., Phillips, D., & Gayer, T. (2008). Preschool programs can boost school readiness. Science, 320, 1723-1724.
11. Greenwald, R., Hedges, L.V., & Laine, R.D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66, 361-396.
12. Guryan, J. (2003). Does money matter? Estimates from education finance reform in Massachusetts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
13. Hanushek, E.A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141-164.
14. Hanushek, E.A. (2003). The failure of input-based schooling policies. Economic Journal, 113(485), F64-F98.
15. Hanushek, E.A., Kain, J.F., Markman, J.M., & Rivkin, S.G. (2003). Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(5), 527-544.
16. Hanushek, E.A., Rivkin, S.G., & Taylor, L.L. (1996). Aggregation and the estimated effects of school resources. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78(4), 611-627.
17. Henry, G.T., Gordon, C.C., & Rickman, D.K. (2006). Early education policy alternatives: Comparing the quality and outcomes of Head Start and state pre-kindergarten. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 77-99.
18. Hines, J.R., & Thaler, R.H. (1995). Anomalies: The flypaper effect. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 217-226.
19. Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945-960.
20. Imbens, G.W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 615-635. doi:10.1016/j. jeconom.2007.05.001.
21. Jacob, B.A., & Lefgren, L. (2004). Remedial education and student achievement: A regression-discontinuity analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 226-244.
22. Killeen, K.M., Monk, D.H., & Plecki, M.L. (2002). School district spending on professional development: Insights available from national data (1992-1998). Journal of Education Finance, 28, 25-50.
23. Mark, M.M., & Shotland, R.L. (1987). Alternative models for the use of multiple methods. New Direc tions for Program Evaluation, 1987(35), 95-100.
24. McCrary, J. (2007). Testing for manipulation of the running variable in the regression discontinuity design. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 698-714.
25. National Research Council. (1999). Making money matter: Financing America's schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
26. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
27. Reichardt, C.S. & Henry, G.T. (in press). The regression-discontinuity design in Cooper, H. (ed.). The handbook of research methods in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28. Rosenbaum, P.R., & Rubin, D.B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-55.
29. Rubin, D.B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701.
30. Rubin, D.B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 322-331.
31. Schochet, P.Z. (2008). Technical methods report: Statistical power for regression discontinuity designs in education evaluations (NCEE 2008-4026). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/.
32. Shadish, W., Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (2001). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
33. Taylor, C.H. (2001). The relationship between student performance and school expenditures: A review of the literature and new evidence using better data. In D. H. Monk, H. J. Walberg, & M. C. Wang (Eds.), Improving educational productivity (pp. 167-184). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
34. Thompson, C.L., Brown, K., Cunningham, E., & Montrosse, B.M. (2008). Leadership, organizational characteristics and performance in North Carolina high schools. Carolina Institute for Public Policy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
35. Todd, P.E., & Wolpin, K.I. (2003). On the specification and estimation of the production function for cognitive achievement. Economic Journal, 113(485), F3-F33.
36. Trochim, W.M.K., Cappelleri, J.C., & Reichardt, C.S. (1991). Random measurement error does not bias the treatment effect estimate in the regression-discontinuity design: II. When an interaction effect is present. Evaluation Review, 15(5), 571-604.
37. van der Klaauw, W. (2002). Estimating the effect of financial aid offers on college enrollment: A regression discontinuity approach. International Economic Review, 43(4), 1249-1287.
38. van der Klaauw, W. (2008). Regression discontinuity analysis: A survey of recent developments in economics. Labour, 22(2), 219-245.
39. Wilde, E.T., & Hollister, R. (2007). How close is close enough? Evaluating propensity score matching using data from a class size reduction experiment. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26(3), 455-477.