The effect of dynamic vessel motion on haemodynamic parameters in the right coronary artery: A combined MR and CFD study

British Journal of Radiology

Volumn 82, Issue SPEC. ISSUE 1, 2009, Pages

  Torii, R ^a   Keegan, J ^b   Wood, N B ^a   Dowsey, A W ^a   Hughes, A D ^c   Yang, G Z ^a   Firmin, D N ^b   McG Thom, S A ^c   Xu, X Y ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL BROMPTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD RHEOLOGY; CORONARY BLOOD VESSEL; HEMODYNAMICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MOTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PULSATILE FLOW;

ADULT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CORONARY VESSELS; HEMODYNAMICS; HEMORHEOLOGY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MOTION; PULSATILE FLOW; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 77954921888     PISSN: 00071285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/62450556     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Atheroma arterial wall shear: observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proc R Soc London, B (Biological Science) 1971;177:109-59.
2. Friedman MH, Deters OJ, Bargeron CB, Hutchins GM, Mark FF. Shear dependent thickening of the human arterial intima. Atherosclerosis 1986;60:161-71.
3. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999;282:2035-42.
4. Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJH, Schuurbiers JCH, Van der Wal AC, Van der Steen AFW, et al. The role of shear stress in the generation of rupture-prone vulnerable plaques. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005;2:401-7.
5. Slager CJ, Wentzel JJ, Gijsen FJH, Thury A, van der Wal AC, Schaar JA, et al. The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2005;2:456-64.
6. Jackson MJ, Wood NB, Zhao SZ, Augst A, Wolfe JH, Gedroyc WMW, et al. Low wall shear stress predicts subsequent development of wall hypertrophy in lower limb bypass grafts. Artery Res 2009;3:32-38.
7. Ding Z, Zhu H, Friedman MH. Coronary artery dynamics in vivo. Ann Biomed Eng 2002;30:419-29.
8. Zeng D, Ding Z, Friedman MH, Ethier CR. Effects of cardiac motion on right coronary artery hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:420-29.
9. Zeng D, Boutsianis E, Ammann M, Boomsma K, Wildermuth S, Poulikakos D. A study on the compliance of a right coronary artery and its impact on wall shear stress. Transactions of the ASME. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:041014.
10. Torii R, Wood NB, Hadjiloizou N, Dowsey AW, Wright AR, Hughes AD, et al. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a patient-specific right coronary artery with physiological velocity and pressure waveforms. Commun Numer Methods Eng 2009;25:565-80.
11. DiMario C, de Feyter PJ, Slager CJ, de Jaeger P, Roelandt JR, Serruys PW. Intracoronary blood flow velocity and transstenotic pressure gradient using sensor-tip pressure and Doppler guidewires: a new technology for the assessment of stenosis severity in the catheterisation laboratory. Cathet Cardiovasc Diag 1993;28:311-19.
12. Sakuma H, Ichikawa Y, Chino S, Hirano T, Makino K, Takeda K. Detection of coronary artery stenosis with wholeheart coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:1951-2.
13. Jahnke C, Paetsch I, Nehrke K, Schnackenburg B, Gabker R, Flecke E, et al. Rapid and complete coronary artery tree visualization with magnetic resonance imaging: feasibility and diagnostic performance. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2313-19.
14. Keegan J, Gatehouse PD, Mohiaddin RH, Yang GZ, Firmin DN. Comparison of spiral and FLASH phase velocity mapping, with and without breath-holding, for the assessment of left and right coronary artery blood flow velocity. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;19:40-9.
15. Keegan J, Gatehouse PD, Yang GZ, Firmin DN. Spiral phase velocity mapping of left and right coronary artery blood flow: correction for through-plane motion using selective fat-only excitation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:953-60.
16. Meyer CH, Hu BS, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Fast spiral coronary artery imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:202-13.
17. Jackson JI, Meyer CH, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Selection of a convolution function for Fourier inversion using gridding. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1991;10:473-8.
18. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Series B 1977;39:1-38.
19. Catmull E, Rom R. A class of local interpolating splines. In: Barnhill R, Reisenfeld R, editors. Computer aided geometric design. New York Academic Press; 1974.
20. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D. Snakes: Active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1988;1:321-31.
21. Xu C, Prince JL. Snakes, shapes and gradient vector flow. IEEE Trans Image Process 1998;7:359-69.
22. Schaar AJ, de Korte CL, Mastik F, van Damme LCA, Krams R, Serruys PW, et al. Three-dimensional palpography of human coronary arteries. Herz 2005;30:125-33.
23. Womersley JR. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J Physiol 1955;127:553-63
24. Santamarina A, Weydahl E, Siegel JM, Moore JE. Computational analysis of flow in a curved tube model of the coronary arteries: effects of time-varying curvature. Ann Biomed Eng 1998;26:944-54.
25. Torii R, Keegan J, Wood NB, Dowsey AW, Hughes AD, Yang GZ, et al. MR image-based geometric and haemodynamic investigation of the right coronary artery with dynamic vessel motion. Magn Reson Med 2009.
26. Zhu H, Friedman MH. Relationship between the dynamic geometry and wall thickness of a human coronary artery. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:2260-5.
27. Hort W, Lichti H, Kalbfleisch H, Kohler F, Frenzel H, Milzner-Schwarz U. The size of human coronary arteries depending on the physiological and pathological growth of the heart the age, the size of the supplying areas and the degree of coronary sclerosis. A postmortem study. Virchows Arch 1982;397:37-59.
28. Ge J, Erbel R, Gerber T, Görge G, Koch L, Haude M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound imaging of angiographically normal coronary arteries: a prospective study in vivo. Heart 1994;71:572-8.
29. Kleinstreuer C, Hyun S, Buchanan JRJ, Longest PW, Archie JPJ, Truskey GA. Hemodynamic parameters and early intimal thickening in branching blood vessels. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 2001;29:1-64.
30. Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation, Positive correlation between plaque location and low and oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 1985;5: 293-302.
31. Stone PH, Coskun AU, Kinlay S, Popma JJ, Sonka M, Wahle A, et al. Regions of low endothelial shear stress ar the sites where coronary plaque progresses and vascular remodeling occurs in humans: an in vivo serial study. Eur Heart J 2007;28:705-10.
32. Tardy Y, Resnick N, Nagel T, Gimbrone Jr MA, Dewey Jr. CF. Shear stress gradients remodel endothelial monolayers in vitro via a cell proliferation-migration-loss cycle. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:3102-6.
33. Augst AD, Ariff B, Thom SA, Xu XY, Hughes AD. Analysis of complex flow and the relationship between blood pressure, wall shear stress, and intima-media thickness in the human carotid artery. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007;293:1031-7.