An analysis of students' perceptions of the value and efficacy of instructors' auditory and text-based feedback modalities across multiple conceptual levels

Journal of Educational Computing Research

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 113-134

  Ice, Phil ^a   Swan, Karen ^b   Diaz, Sebastian ^c   Kupczynski, Lori ^d   Swan Dagen, Allison ^c  

^a AMERICAN PUBLIC UNIVERSITY SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD   (United States)

^c WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77954883010     PISSN: 07356331     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2190/EC.43.1.g     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
2. Bargeron, D., Grudin, A., Gupta, E., Sanocki, F., & Leetiernan, S. (2002). Asynchronous collaboration around multimedia applied to on-demand education. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(4), 117-145.
3. Bullen, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 1-32.
4. Crews, T., & Wilkinson, K. (2009, April 22). Auditory and visual assessment preferred by learners. Paper presented at the 2009 Teaching and Learning with Technology Conference. Retrieved July 22, 2009, from http://www.itap.purdue.edu/tlt/conference/presentation.cfm?propid=90
5. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7-23.
6. Greivenkamp, D., Stoll, C., & Johnston, H. (2009, April 21). Demystifying invisible processes using mediated feedback. Paper presented at the 2009 Teaching and Learning with Technology Conference. Retrieved July 25, 2009, from http://www.itap.purdue.edu/tlt/conference/presentation.cfm?propid=133
7. Gunawardena, C., & Zittle, F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computermediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-26.
8. Ice, P. (2008, April). The impact of asynchronous audio feedback on teaching, social and cognitive presence. Paper presented at the First International Conference of the Canadian Network for Innovation in Education, Banff, Alberta.
9. Ice, P., Curtis, R., Phillips, P., & Wells, J. (2007). Using asynchronous audio feedback to enhance teaching presence and student sense of community. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(2), 3-25.
10. Laffey, J., Lin, G., & Lin, Y (2006). Assessing social ability in online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 163-177.
11. Lombard, M., & Dutton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 3(2). Retrieved July 25, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html
12. Oomen-Early, J., Bold, M., Wiginton, K. L., Gallien, T. L., & Anderson, N. (2008). Using asynchronous audio communication (AAC) in the online classroom: A comparative study. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(3). Retrieved July 25, 2009, from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no3/oomen-early-0908. htm
13. Rice, R. E. (1992). Contexts of research in organizational computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
14. Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197-211.
15. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. Toronto, ON: Wiley.
16. Simonsson, M., Kupczynski, L., Ice, P., & Pankake, A. (2009, April). The impact of asynchronous audio feedback in the dissertation advising process. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
17. Stern, L. A., & Solomon, M. A. (2006). Effective faculty feedback: The road less traveled. Assessing Writing, 11(1), 22-41.
18. Swan, K. (2002). Building communities in online course: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication and Information, 2(1), 34-49.
19. Swan, K., Richardson, J. C., Ice, P., Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry, eMentor, 24(2). Retrieved July 15, 2009, from http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul-v2.php?numer=24&id=543
20. Swan-Dagen, A., Rinehart, S., Mader, C., & Ice, P. (2008). Can you hear me now? Providing feedback using audio commenting technology. Navigating the Literacy Waters: Research Praxis and Advocacy. College Reading Association Yearbook 2008, 153-166.
21. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.