The reliability of side to side measurements of upper extremity activity levels in healthy subjects

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Acuna, Miguel ^a   Amasay, Tal ^b   Karduna, Andrew R ^c  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BARRY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; RELIABILITY; SENSOR; SIDE TO SIDE MEASUREMENT; STUDENT T TEST; ACCELERATION; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARM; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; GAIT; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; WALKING;

ACCELERATION; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARM; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; GAIT; HUMANS; MALE; MOVEMENT; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954802322     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-168     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Inertial measurements of upper limb motion. H Zhou H Hu Y Tao, Med Biol Eng Comput 2006 44 6 479 487 10.1007/s11517-006-0063-z 16937199
2. The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. KY Chen DR Bassett Jr, Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005 37 11 Suppl 490 500 10.1249/01.mss.0000185571.49104.82 16294112
3. Ambulatory monitoring of arm movement using accelerometry: an objective measure of upper-extremity rehabilitation in persons with chronic stroke. G Uswatte WL Foo H Olmstead K Lopez A Holand LB Simms, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 86 7 1498 1501 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.010 16003690
4. Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. CE Lang JM Wagner DF Edwards AW Dromerick, J Neurol Phys Ther 2007 31 2 56 63 17558358
5. Continuous monitoring of upper-limb activity in a free-living environment. A Vega-Gonzalez MH Granat, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005 86 3 541 548 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.049 15759242
6. Impact of upper limb complex regional pain syndrome type 1 on everyday life measured with a novel upper limb-activity monitor. FC Schasfoort JB Bussmann AM Zandbergen HJ Stam, Pain 2003 101 1-2 79 88 10.1016/S0304-3959(02) 00298-1 12507702
7. Assessment of workload and arm position during different work sequences: a study with portable devices on construction workers. H Sporrong L Sandsjo R Kadefors P Herberts, Appl Ergon 1999 30 6 495 503 10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00016-2 10693829
8. Arm and trunk posture during work in relation to shoulder and neck pain and trapezius activity. O Vasseljen Jr RH Westgaard, Clin Biomech 1997 12 1 22 31 10.1016/S0268-0033(97)00048-X (Pubitemid 27078957)
9. Upper-arm elevation during office work. EA Fernstrom MO Ericson, Ergonomics 1996 39 10 1221 1230 10.1080/00140139608964541 8974883
10. HARBO, a simple computer-aided observation method for recording work postures. C Wiktorin M Mortimer L Ekenvall A Kilbom EW Hjelm, Scand J Work Environ Health 1995 21 6 440 449 8824750
11. Precision of measurements of physical workload during standardised manual handling. Part II: Inclinometry of head, upper back, neck and upper arms. G Hansson I Arvidsson K Ohlsson C Nordander SE Mathiassen S Skerfving I Balogh, J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2005 16102977
12. Work related shoulder disorders: quantitative exposure-response relations with reference to arm posture. SW Svendsen JP Bonde SE Mathiassen K Stengaard-Pedersen LH Frich, Occup Environ Med 2004 61 10 844 853 10.1136/oem.2003.010637 15377771
13. Validity of fixed-interval observations for postural assessment in construction work. VL Paquet L Punnett B Buchholz, Appl Ergon 2001 32 3 215 224 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00002-3 11394462
14. Variability in mechanical exposure within and between individuals performing a highly constrained industrial work task. SE Mathiassen T Moller M Forsman, Ergonomics 2003 46 8 800 824 10.1080/0014013031000090125 12745980
15. Arm position during daily activity. B Coley BM Jolles A Farron K Aminian, Gait Posture 2008 28 4 581 587 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.04.014 18547809
16. What drives children's limb selection for reaching in hemispace? C Gabbard CR Helbig, Exp Brain Res 2004 156 3 325 332 10.1007/s00221-003-1792-y 14745465
17. The effects of skill demands and object position on the distribution of preferred hand reaches. CM Mamolo EA Roy PJ Bryden LE Rohr, Brain Cogn 2004 55 2 349 351 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.041 15177810
18. The effects of age, sex, and shoulder dominance on range of motion of the shoulder. CJ Barnes SJ Van Steyn RA Fischer, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001 10 3 242 246 10.1067/mse.2001.115270 11408905
19. The effect of handedness on electromyographic activity of human shoulder muscles during movement. LP Diederichsen J Norregaard P Dyhre-Poulsen A Winther G Tufekovic T Bandholm LR Rasmussen M Krogsgaard, J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2007 17 4 410 419 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.03.004 16839778
20. Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and nondominant arm reaching. RL Sainburg D Kalakanis, J Neurophysiol 2000 83 5 2661 2675 10805666
21. Detection of the movement of the humerus during daily activity. B Coley BM Jolles A Farron K Aminian, Med Biol Eng Comput 2009 19277750
22. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. RC Oldfield, Neuropsychologia 1971 9 1 97 113 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 5146491
23. Precision of measurements of physical workload during standardised manual handling. Part II: Inclinometry of head, upper back, neck and upper arms. GA Hansson I Arvidsson K Ohlsson C Nordander SE Mathiassen S Skerfving I Balogh, J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2006 16 2 125 136 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.06.009 16102977
24. Validation of tri-axial accelerometer for the calculation of elevation angles. T Amasay K Zodrow L Kincl J Hess A Karduna, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 2009 39 5 783 789 10.1016/j.ergon.2009.03.005
25. Job enlargement and mechanical exposure variability in cyclic assembly work. T Moller SE Mathiassen H Franzon S Kihlberg, Ergonomics 2004 47 1 19 40 10.1080/0014013032000121651 14660216
26. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. PW Stratford CH Goldsmith, Phys Ther 1997 77 7 745 750 9225846
27. Foundations of Clinical Research: Application to Practice. LG Portney MP Watkins, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc 3 2009
28. Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. JM Wagner JA Rhodes C Patten, Phys Ther 2008 88 5 652 663 18326055
29. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. F Faul E Erdfelder AG Lang A Buchner, Behav Res Methods 2007 39 2 175 191 17695343
30. Intrarater reliability of CROM measurement of cervical spine active range of motion in persons with and without neck pain. JP Fletcher WD Bandy, J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2008 38 10 640 645 18827326
31. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. JM Bland DG Altman, Lancet 1986 1 8476 307 310 2868172
32. Arm swing magnitude and asymmetry during gait in the early stages of Parkinson's disease. MD Lewek R Poole J Johnson O Halawa X Huang, Gait Posture 2010 31 2 256 260 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.10.013 19945285
33. Dissociation of initial trajectory and final position errors during visuomotor adaptation following unilateral stroke. SY Schaefer KY Haaland RL Sainburg, Brain Res 2009 1298 78 91 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.063 19728993
34. Performance of the 'unaffected' upper extremity of elderly stroke patients. J Desrosiers D Bourbonnais G Bravo PM Roy M Guay, Stroke 1996 27 9 1564 1570 8784131
35. Upper motor neuron lesions: their effect on muscle performance and appearance in stroke patients with minor motor impairment. KS Sunnerhagen U Svantesson L Lonn M Krotkiewski G Grimby, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999 80 2 155 161 10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90113-2 10025489
36. The demographic and morphological features of rotator cuff disease. A comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic shoulders. K Yamaguchi K Ditsios WD Middleton CF Hildebolt LM Galatz SA Teefey, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 88 8 1699 1704 10.2106/JBJS.E.00835 16882890
37. Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. MJ Mathie AC Coster NH Lovell BG Celler, Physiol Meas 2004 25 2 1 20 10.1088/0967-3334/25/2/R01 15132305
38. Work above shoulder level and degenerative alterations of the rotator cuff tendons: a magnetic resonance imaging study. SW Svendsen J Gelineck SE Mathiassen JP Bonde LH Frich K Stengaard-Pedersen N Egund, Arthritis Rheum 2004 50 10 3314 3322 10.1002/art.20495 15476229
39. Shoulder disorders and postural stress in automobile assembly work. L Punnett LJ Fine WM Keyserling GD Herrin DB Chaffin, Scand J Work Environ Health 2000 26 4 283 291 10994793
40. Repetitive industrial work and neck and upper limb disorders in females. K Ohlsson RG Attewell B Palsson B Karlsson I Balogh B Johnsson A Ahlm S Skerfving, Am J Ind Med 1995 27 5 731 747 10.1002/ajim.4700270508 7611308
41. Efficient one-day sampling of mechanical job exposure data - a study based on upper trapezius activity in cleaners and office workers. SE Mathiassen A Burdorf AJ van der Beek GA Hansson, AIHAJ - A Journal for the Science of Occupational and Environmental Health and Safety 2003 64 2 196 211
42. Quantifying variation in physical load using exposure-vs-time data. SE Mathiassen J Winkel, Ergonomics 1991 34 12 1455 1468 10.1080/00140139108964889 1800110
43. A novel approach for evaluating level, frequency and duration of lumbar posture simultaneously during work. JP Jansen A Burdorf E Steyerberg, Scand J Work Environ Health 2001 27 6 373 380 11800324
44. Estimating dominant upper-limb segments during daily activity. B Coley BM Jolles A Farron C Pichonnaz JP Bassin K Aminian, Gait Posture 2008 27 3 368 375 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.05.005 17582769
45. Ambulatory measurement of upper limb usage and mobility-related activities during normal daily life with an upper limb-activity monitor: a feasibility study. FC Schasfoort JB Bussmann HJ Stam, Med Biol Eng Comput 2002 40 2 173 182 10.1007/BF02348122 12043798
46. A triaxial accelerometer for measuring arm movements. E Bernmark C Wiktorin, Appl Ergon 2002 33 6 541 547 10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00072-8 12507338
47. Does centripetal acceleration affect trunk flexion monitoring by means of accelerometers? D Giansanti, Physiol Meas 2006 27 10 999 1008 10.1088/0967-3334/27/10/006 16951459
48. Ambulatory measurement of shoulder and elbow kinematics through inertial and magnetic sensors. AG Cutti A Giovanardi L Rocchi A Davalli R Sacchetti, Med Biol Eng Comput 2008 46 2 169 178 10.1007/s11517-007-0296-5 18087742
49. Dynamic accuracy of inertial measurement units during simple pendulum motion. MA Brodie A Walmsley W Page, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2008 11 3 235 242 10.1080/10255840802125526 18568821
50. Estimation of upper-limb orientation based on accelerometer and gyroscope measurements. RA Hyde LP Ketteringham SA Neild RS Jones, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008 55 2 Pt 1 746 754 10.1109/TBME.2007.912647 18270013
51. Hand preference and age in the United States. AN Gilbert CJ Wysocki, Neuropsychologia 1992 30 7 601 608 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90065-T 1528408