What drives children's limb selection for reaching in hemispace?

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 156, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 325-332

  Gabbard, Carl ^a   Helbig, Casi Rabb ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Children; Handedness; Reaching

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BODY MOVEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ARM; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CHILD; COGNITION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOVEMENT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL FIELDS; VOLITION;

EID: 2942718585     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1792-y     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Annett M (1985) Left, right, hand and brain: the right shift theory. Erlbaum, London
2. Annett M (1995) The right shift theory of a genetic balanced polymorphism for cerebral dominance and cognitive processing. Curr Psychol Cogn 14:427-480
3. Carello C, Grosofsky A, Reichel FD, Soloan HY, Turvey MT (1989) Visually perceiving what is reachable. Ecol Psychol 1:27-54
4. Carey D, Otto-de Haart EG (2001) Hemispatial differences in visually guided aiming are neither hemispatial nor visual. Neuropsychologia 39:885-894
5. Carey D, Hargreaves EL, Goodale MA (1996) Reaching to ipsilateral or contralateral targets: within-hemisphere visuomotor processing cannot explain hemispatial differences in motor control. Exp Brain Res 112:496-504
6. Carnahan H (1998) Manual asymmetries in response to rapid target movement. Brain Cogn 37:23-353
7. Coren S (1993) The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: norms for young adults. Bull Psychonom Soc 31:1-3
8. Day BL, Lyon IN (2000) Voluntary modification of automatic arm movements evoked by motion of a visual target. Exp Brain Res 130:159-168
9. Decety J (1996) The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 77:45-52
10. Gabbard C, Iteya M, Rabb C (1997) A lateralized comparison of handedness and object proximity. Can J Exp Psychol 51:176-180
11. Gabbard C, Rabb C, Gentry V (1998) Attentional stimuli and programming hand selection: a developmental perspective. Int J Neurosci 96:205-215
12. Gabbard C, Rabb C, Gentry V (2001) Lateralized effects on reaching by children. Dev Neuropsychol 19:41-52
13. Gerardin E, Sirigu A, Lehericy S, Poline JB, Gaymard B, Marsault C, Agid Y, Le B (2000) Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements. Cereb Cortex 10:1093-1104
14. Geschwind DH, Miller BL, CeCarli C, Carmelli D (2002) Heritability of lobar brain volumes in twins supports genetic models of cerebral laterality and handedness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3176-3181
15. Hammond G (2002) Correlates of human handedness in primary motor cortex: a review and hypothesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:285-292
16. Harris KJ, Carlson DF (1993) Hand preference for visually-guided reaching in human infants and adults. In: Ward JP, Hopkins WD (eds) Primary laterality: current behavioral evidence of primate asymmetries. Springer, New York, pp 267-283
17. Hellige JB, Kee DW (1990) Asymmetric manual interference as an indicator of lateralized brain function. In: Hammond GR (ed) Cerebral control of speech and limb movements. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 635-660
18. Hommel B (1993) Inverting the Simon effect by intention: determinants of direction and extent of effects of irrelevant spatial information. Psychol Res/Psychol Forsch 55:270-279
19. Jeannerod M (1995) Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia 33:1419-1432
20. Johnson S (2000) Thinking ahead: the case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension. Cognition 74:33-70
21. Johnson S, Corballis P, Gazzaniga M (2001) Within grasp but out of reach: evidence for a double dissociation between imagined hand and arm movements in the left cerebral hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 39:36-50
22. Lotze M, Montoya P, Erb M, Hulsmann E, Flor H, Klose U, Birbaumer N, Grodd W (1999) Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 11:491-501
23. Mark LS, Nemeth K, Gardner D, Dainoff MJ, Paasche J, Duffy M, Grandt K (1997) Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1365-1379
24. Maruff P, Wilson PH, De Fazio J, Cerritelli B, Hedt A, Currie J (1999) Asymmetries between dominant and non-dominant hands in real and imagined motor task performance. Neuropsychologia 37:379-384
25. McCartney G, Hepper P (1999) Development of lateralized behaviour in the human fetus from 12 to 27 weeks' gestation. Dev Med Child Neurol 41:83-86
26. McManus CI, Sik G, Cole DR, Mellon AF, Wong J, Kloss MJ (1988) The development of handedness in children. Br J Dev Psychol 6:257-273
27. Michel GF, Sheu C, Brumley MR (2002) Evidence of a right shirt factor affecting infant hand-use preferences from 7 to 11 months of age as revealed by latent class analysis. Dev Psychobiol 40:1-13
28. Mieschke OE, Elliott D, Helsen WF, Carson RG, Coull JA (2001) Manual asymmetries in the preparation and control of goal-oriented movements. Brain Cogn 45:129-140
29. Nair DG, Purcott KL, Fuchs A, Steinburg F, Kelso JAS (2003) Cortical and cerebellar activity of the human brain during imagined and executed unimanual and bimanual action sequences: a functional MRI study. Cogn Brain Res 15:250-560
30. Newell KM (1986) Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA (eds) Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Nijhoff, Boston, pp 341-360
31. Papaxanthis C, Pozzo T, Skoura X, Schiepati M (2002) Does order and timing in performance of imagined and actual movements affect the motor imagery process? The duration of walking and writing task. Behav Brain Res 134:209-215
32. Parsons LM, Fox PT (1998) The neural basis of implicit movements used in recognising hand shape. Cogn Neuropsychol 15:583-615
33. Perris E, Clifton R (1988) Reaching in the dark toward sound as a measure of auditory localization in infants. Infant Behav Dev 11:473-492
34. Peters M (1995) Handedness and its relation to other indices of cerebral lateralization. In: Davidson RJ, Hugdahl K (eds) Brain asymmetry. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 183-214
35. Porro CA, Cettolo V, Francescato MP, Baraldi P (2000) Ipsilateral involvement of primary motor cortex during motor imagery. Eur J Neurosci 12:3059-3063
36. Robin DJ, Berthier NE, Clifton RK (1996) Infants' predictive reaching for moving objects in the dark. Dev Psychol 32:824-835
37. Romero DH, Lacourse MG, Lawrence KE, Schandler S, Cohen MJ (2000) Event-related potentials as a function of movement parameter variations during motor imagery and isometric action. Behav Brain Res 117:83-96
38. Rosenbaum DA (1991) Human motor control. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 218-222
39. Simon JR (1969) Reactions towards the source of stimulation. J Exp Psychol 81:74-176
40. Stins JF, Michaels CF (1997) Stimulus-target compatibility for reaching movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:756-767
41. Stins JF, Kadar EE, Costall A (2001) A kinematic analysis of hand selection in a reaching. Laterality 6:347-367
42. Van Strien V (2000) Origins of human handedness. In: Mandal M, Bulman-Fleming B, Tiwari G (eds) Side bias: a neuropsychological perspective. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 41-62
43. Velay J, Benoit-Dubrocard S (1999) Hemispheric asymmetry and interhemispheric transfer in reaching programming. Neuropsychologia 37:895-903
44. Verfaellie M, Heilman K (1990) Hemispheric asymmetries in attentional control: implications for hand preference in sensorimotor tasks. Brain Cogn 14:70-80
45. Verfaellie M, Bowers D, Heilman KM (1988) Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Neuropsychologia 28:435-444